{"title":"Mitigating arterial compliance to diminish migraine risk: A hypothesis","authors":"Yaheng Zhao , Xiaoyan Qin , Guoli Zhao , Zeguo Feng , Shaohua You","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2025.111715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Migraine is a disabling neurovascular disorder that primarily affects young people and women, despite their generally high arterial compliance. We hypothesize that a reduction in arterial compliance may lower the risk of migraine. This counter – intuitive view is supported by the observation that young people and women, who typically have better vascular compliance, have the highest prevalence of migraine, while diseases associated with reduced compliance, such as diabetes, show a lower incidence of migraine. Using Mendelian randomization with genetic variants related to pulse pressure as a proxy for arterial compliance, our study found that a higher pulse pressure (indicating lower compliance) was associated with a reduced risk of migraine. This is consistent with the mechanisms of current migraine treatments, such as triptans, CGRP inhibitors, and warfarin, which reduce arterial compliance, and vasodilators like nitroglycerin, which can trigger migraines by increasing compliance. If confirmed, this hypothesis could transform our understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine and inspire new treatment strategies targeting arterial compliance. Future research should further explore this relationship through clinical and experimental studies to elucidate the potential mechanisms and applications for migraine prevention and treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 111715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987725001549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Migraine is a disabling neurovascular disorder that primarily affects young people and women, despite their generally high arterial compliance. We hypothesize that a reduction in arterial compliance may lower the risk of migraine. This counter – intuitive view is supported by the observation that young people and women, who typically have better vascular compliance, have the highest prevalence of migraine, while diseases associated with reduced compliance, such as diabetes, show a lower incidence of migraine. Using Mendelian randomization with genetic variants related to pulse pressure as a proxy for arterial compliance, our study found that a higher pulse pressure (indicating lower compliance) was associated with a reduced risk of migraine. This is consistent with the mechanisms of current migraine treatments, such as triptans, CGRP inhibitors, and warfarin, which reduce arterial compliance, and vasodilators like nitroglycerin, which can trigger migraines by increasing compliance. If confirmed, this hypothesis could transform our understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine and inspire new treatment strategies targeting arterial compliance. Future research should further explore this relationship through clinical and experimental studies to elucidate the potential mechanisms and applications for migraine prevention and treatment.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.