Reut Ron , Paula Feder-Bubis , Kierstin Trocha , Moriah Ellen
{"title":"A new integrated conceptual framework of health insurance literacy: Results of a critical interpretive synthesis","authors":"Reut Ron , Paula Feder-Bubis , Kierstin Trocha , Moriah Ellen","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Health insurance literacy (HIL) is the knowledge, ability, and confidence to find and understand health insurance information, and choose, purchase and use an insurance plan. Despite the increasing volume of research on HIL, the approaches to this field remain fragmented.</div><div>This review paper aims to develop a conceptual framework delineating the attributes, personal contexts, and environmental influences, which either influence or are influenced by an individual's HIL level.</div><div>We have adopted a critical interpretive synthesis approach with purposive sampling and inductive analysis, integrating all existing models from the literature, with additional findings. The CIS methodology emphasizes iterative data synthesis to generate theory from diverse sources, ceasing data extraction upon achieving theoretical saturation. This reflects the stage at which further data collection no longer yields new conceptual insights.</div><div>Four databases were systematically screened in September 2020 and July 2023, yielding 6096 articles. Following a review of titles and abstracts, 388 papers were deemed relevant, and 76 were included in the final synthesis. The resulting framework consists of eight categories, 17 subcategories, and 129 codes, with HIL level as its core. Other components include individual predictors, external influences, skills and abilities, perceptions and beliefs, preferences, decision-making processes, and outcomes.</div><div>This framework provides a comprehensive tool for guiding interventions and research aimed at improving HIL. It allows researchers and policymakers to address the diverse and interconnected factors influencing HIL and to develop targeted, evidence-based strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Health insurance literacy (HIL) is the knowledge, ability, and confidence to find and understand health insurance information, and choose, purchase and use an insurance plan. Despite the increasing volume of research on HIL, the approaches to this field remain fragmented.
This review paper aims to develop a conceptual framework delineating the attributes, personal contexts, and environmental influences, which either influence or are influenced by an individual's HIL level.
We have adopted a critical interpretive synthesis approach with purposive sampling and inductive analysis, integrating all existing models from the literature, with additional findings. The CIS methodology emphasizes iterative data synthesis to generate theory from diverse sources, ceasing data extraction upon achieving theoretical saturation. This reflects the stage at which further data collection no longer yields new conceptual insights.
Four databases were systematically screened in September 2020 and July 2023, yielding 6096 articles. Following a review of titles and abstracts, 388 papers were deemed relevant, and 76 were included in the final synthesis. The resulting framework consists of eight categories, 17 subcategories, and 129 codes, with HIL level as its core. Other components include individual predictors, external influences, skills and abilities, perceptions and beliefs, preferences, decision-making processes, and outcomes.
This framework provides a comprehensive tool for guiding interventions and research aimed at improving HIL. It allows researchers and policymakers to address the diverse and interconnected factors influencing HIL and to develop targeted, evidence-based strategies.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.