Should autonomous vehicles be subsidized to reduce parking fees? A productivity perspective

IF 14.5 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Yao Li , Ziyue Yang , Tao Wang , Shuxian Xu , Jiancheng Long
{"title":"Should autonomous vehicles be subsidized to reduce parking fees? A productivity perspective","authors":"Yao Li ,&nbsp;Ziyue Yang ,&nbsp;Tao Wang ,&nbsp;Shuxian Xu ,&nbsp;Jiancheng Long","doi":"10.1016/j.commtr.2025.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Governments often advocate for and implement policies to promote the development of new technologies, such as electric vehicles. Are these policies promoting new mobility modes applicable to autonomous vehicles (AVs)? In this study, we develop an economic model to capture residents' behaviors, including mode choice, location choice, and parking choice. Two parking choices (parking downtown or at home) for AV users are considered. We construct utility maximization models under a user equilibrium state to capture government planning and residents' choices. By deriving the first-order conditions of the model, we analyze the influence of AVs on urban characteristics. We emphasize how the parking subsidy affects AV users’ behavior, thereby influencing urban productivity. The results indicate that parking subsidies for AVs undermine urban productivity, whereas cash-out policies, such as providing subsidies for public transit, can effectively enhance urban productivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100292,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Transportation Research","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100196"},"PeriodicalIF":14.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424725000368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Governments often advocate for and implement policies to promote the development of new technologies, such as electric vehicles. Are these policies promoting new mobility modes applicable to autonomous vehicles (AVs)? In this study, we develop an economic model to capture residents' behaviors, including mode choice, location choice, and parking choice. Two parking choices (parking downtown or at home) for AV users are considered. We construct utility maximization models under a user equilibrium state to capture government planning and residents' choices. By deriving the first-order conditions of the model, we analyze the influence of AVs on urban characteristics. We emphasize how the parking subsidy affects AV users’ behavior, thereby influencing urban productivity. The results indicate that parking subsidies for AVs undermine urban productivity, whereas cash-out policies, such as providing subsidies for public transit, can effectively enhance urban productivity.
自动驾驶汽车应该得到补贴以降低停车费吗?生产力视角
政府经常倡导和实施促进新技术发展的政策,如电动汽车。这些促进新出行模式的政策是否适用于自动驾驶汽车?在本研究中,我们建立了一个经济模型来捕捉居民的行为,包括模式选择、位置选择和停车选择。为自动驾驶汽车用户提供两种停车选择(市中心或家中)。我们构建了用户均衡状态下的效用最大化模型来捕捉政府规划和居民选择。通过推导模型的一阶条件,分析了自动驾驶汽车对城市特征的影响。我们强调停车补贴如何影响自动驾驶汽车用户的行为,从而影响城市生产力。研究结果表明,自动驾驶汽车停车补贴对城市生产力造成了损害,而公共交通补贴等套现政策则能有效提高城市生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信