A Delphi Consensus on Recommendations for Improving Research Processes and Infrastructure to Address Health Disparities

Amira Mohamed MD , A. Adegunsoye MD, FACP, FCCP , M. Armstrong-Hough MPH, PhD , N. Ferguson-Myrthil PharmD, BCCCP , I. Hassan MD , F.B. Mayr MD, MPH , T.S. Valley MD , D.R. Winkfield PhD, RN, FNP-BC , C.B. Walsh MD , J.T. Chen MD
{"title":"A Delphi Consensus on Recommendations for Improving Research Processes and Infrastructure to Address Health Disparities","authors":"Amira Mohamed MD ,&nbsp;A. Adegunsoye MD, FACP, FCCP ,&nbsp;M. Armstrong-Hough MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;N. Ferguson-Myrthil PharmD, BCCCP ,&nbsp;I. Hassan MD ,&nbsp;F.B. Mayr MD, MPH ,&nbsp;T.S. Valley MD ,&nbsp;D.R. Winkfield PhD, RN, FNP-BC ,&nbsp;C.B. Walsh MD ,&nbsp;J.T. Chen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Racial and ethnic disparities in critical care medicine remain poorly understood, making them difficult to address. This initiative developed a thought leader consensus with recommendations for critical care research to document, assess, and understand potential disparities.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What key areas should future critical care research focus on to better identify and address disparities related to race, ethnicity, and language?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>A modified Delphi-based method was used to form a consensus about addressing racial disparities through future critical care research. Nine thought leaders discussed aspects related to 4 topics: collection of race, ethnicity, and language variables; establishing recruitment plans for researchers from racial and ethnic minority groups; designating minority serving institutions; and health disparity education and community engagement. Consensus was reached when ≥ 80% of members agreed (answered with yes or with 4 to 5 points on a Likert scale).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thought leaders arrived at a consensus agreement (100%) that improved data quality, achieved by more robust recruitment of research participants from racial and ethnic minority groups and standardization of race and ethnicity data, is crucial as the initial step of uncovering health disparities. They agreed that collection of language preferences should be part of all research studies to expose potential biases and disparities in non-English speakers (100% agreement). Engagement of racial and ethnic minority communities was agreed to be essential to obtain involvement of research participants from such minoritized groups (100%).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This consensus revealed the notable data deficiency impacting health disparities within critical care research especially when compared with other settings, highlighting the crucial need for comprehensive focus on this domain. Standardization of race, ethnicity, and language data collection, with the goal of increasing the number of research participants from racial and ethnic minority groups, is vital for understanding health disparities in critical care research and its potential causes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788425000334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Racial and ethnic disparities in critical care medicine remain poorly understood, making them difficult to address. This initiative developed a thought leader consensus with recommendations for critical care research to document, assess, and understand potential disparities.

Research Question

What key areas should future critical care research focus on to better identify and address disparities related to race, ethnicity, and language?

Study Design and Methods

A modified Delphi-based method was used to form a consensus about addressing racial disparities through future critical care research. Nine thought leaders discussed aspects related to 4 topics: collection of race, ethnicity, and language variables; establishing recruitment plans for researchers from racial and ethnic minority groups; designating minority serving institutions; and health disparity education and community engagement. Consensus was reached when ≥ 80% of members agreed (answered with yes or with 4 to 5 points on a Likert scale).

Results

Thought leaders arrived at a consensus agreement (100%) that improved data quality, achieved by more robust recruitment of research participants from racial and ethnic minority groups and standardization of race and ethnicity data, is crucial as the initial step of uncovering health disparities. They agreed that collection of language preferences should be part of all research studies to expose potential biases and disparities in non-English speakers (100% agreement). Engagement of racial and ethnic minority communities was agreed to be essential to obtain involvement of research participants from such minoritized groups (100%).

Interpretation

This consensus revealed the notable data deficiency impacting health disparities within critical care research especially when compared with other settings, highlighting the crucial need for comprehensive focus on this domain. Standardization of race, ethnicity, and language data collection, with the goal of increasing the number of research participants from racial and ethnic minority groups, is vital for understanding health disparities in critical care research and its potential causes.
德尔菲共识建议改善研究过程和基础设施,以解决健康差距
背景:在重症监护医学中,种族和种族差异仍然知之甚少,使其难以解决。这一倡议形成了一个思想领袖共识,为重症监护研究提供了建议,以记录、评估和理解潜在的差异。研究问题:未来的重症监护研究应该关注哪些关键领域,以更好地识别和解决与种族、民族和语言相关的差异?研究设计与方法采用改进的德尔菲方法,对未来危重病研究中解决种族差异问题形成共识。九位思想领袖讨论了与四个主题相关的方面:种族、民族和语言变量的收集;制定招收少数民族研究人员的计划;指定少数族裔服务机构;健康差距教育和社区参与。当≥80%的成员同意(回答为“是”或李克特量表上的4到5分)时,达成共识。结果思想领袖达成了一项共识(100%),即通过更有力地招募来自种族和少数民族群体的研究参与者以及种族和民族数据的标准化来提高数据质量,作为揭示健康差异的第一步至关重要。他们一致认为,收集语言偏好应该是所有研究的一部分,以揭示非英语使用者的潜在偏见和差异(100%同意)。与会者同意,少数种族和族裔社区的参与对于获得这些少数群体的研究参与者的参与至关重要(100%)。这一共识揭示了影响重症监护研究中健康差异的显著数据不足,特别是与其他环境相比,突出了对这一领域全面关注的迫切需要。种族、民族和语言数据收集的标准化,目标是增加来自种族和少数民族群体的研究参与者的数量,对于了解重症监护研究中的健康差异及其潜在原因至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信