\Dosimetry audits in high dose rate brachytherapy: A survey on the current scenario in Europe

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Laura Oliver-Cañamás , Javier Vijande , Cristian Candela-Juan , Jose Perez-Calatayud
{"title":"\\Dosimetry audits in high dose rate brachytherapy: A survey on the current scenario in Europe","authors":"Laura Oliver-Cañamás ,&nbsp;Javier Vijande ,&nbsp;Cristian Candela-Juan ,&nbsp;Jose Perez-Calatayud","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This work aims to study the current scenario of dosimetry audits in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) in Europe to evaluate whether there is a need to implement more services of this type and to define the characteristics that they should meet according to users.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A survey consisting of 30 multiple choice questions was designed and distributed among European centers. The estimated time to answer was less than 15 min. 74 HDR BT centers participated, having <sup>192</sup>Ir, <sup>60</sup>Co and/or electronic sources. Information about users’ opinions and experience with dosimetry audits in this field, center resources and quality assurance (QA) procedures was gathered.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For 61 % of users, dosimetry audits in HDR BT should be recommended, but not mandatory, whereas 35 % suggested that they are necessary and should be compulsory. Only for 4 % of participants these audits are not necessary. In contrast, 86 % of users found that the current number of these services is inadequate and that more national and/or international services are needed. Most participants operate according to QA recommendations of published guidelines, with exceptions, such as the use of the Reference Air Kerma Rate provided by the manufacturer instead of the one measured by the home medical physicist.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The number of HDR BT dosimetry audits available to users is inadequate and there is a need to implement more national and/or international services of this type. Some technical aspects that an audit of this type should fulfill are outlined in this work.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 105047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725001577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This work aims to study the current scenario of dosimetry audits in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) in Europe to evaluate whether there is a need to implement more services of this type and to define the characteristics that they should meet according to users.

Material and methods

A survey consisting of 30 multiple choice questions was designed and distributed among European centers. The estimated time to answer was less than 15 min. 74 HDR BT centers participated, having 192Ir, 60Co and/or electronic sources. Information about users’ opinions and experience with dosimetry audits in this field, center resources and quality assurance (QA) procedures was gathered.

Results

For 61 % of users, dosimetry audits in HDR BT should be recommended, but not mandatory, whereas 35 % suggested that they are necessary and should be compulsory. Only for 4 % of participants these audits are not necessary. In contrast, 86 % of users found that the current number of these services is inadequate and that more national and/or international services are needed. Most participants operate according to QA recommendations of published guidelines, with exceptions, such as the use of the Reference Air Kerma Rate provided by the manufacturer instead of the one measured by the home medical physicist.

Conclusion

The number of HDR BT dosimetry audits available to users is inadequate and there is a need to implement more national and/or international services of this type. Some technical aspects that an audit of this type should fulfill are outlined in this work.
高剂量率近距离放射治疗的剂量学审计:欧洲目前情况的调查
本工作旨在研究欧洲高剂量率(HDR)近距离放射治疗(BT)剂量学审计的现状,以评估是否需要实施更多这类服务,并根据用户定义它们应满足的特征。材料和方法设计了一项由30个选择题组成的调查,并在欧洲各中心分发。估计回答时间少于15分钟。74个HDR BT中心参与,有192Ir, 60Co和/或电子来源。收集了用户对该领域剂量学审核的意见和经验、中心资源和质量保证(QA)程序的信息。结果61%的用户建议对HDR BT进行剂量学审核,但不是强制性的,而35%的用户认为有必要,应该是强制性的。只有4%的参与者不需要这些审核。相比之下,86%的用户认为目前这些服务的数量不足,需要更多的国内和(或)国际服务。大多数参与者根据已发布的指导方针的QA建议操作,但有例外,例如使用制造商提供的参考空气克尔玛率,而不是由家庭医学物理学家测量的值。结论使用者可获得的HDR BT剂量学审计数量不足,有必要实施更多这类国家和/或国际服务。本文概述了此类审计应完成的一些技术方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信