Efficacy of GLP-1 agonists vs. other weight management medications in obese and overweight patients

Arielle Davidson, Christina Inteso, Nolan Rossman, Toni Larson, Kathryn Dudzinski
{"title":"Efficacy of GLP-1 agonists vs. other weight management medications in obese and overweight patients","authors":"Arielle Davidson,&nbsp;Christina Inteso,&nbsp;Nolan Rossman,&nbsp;Toni Larson,&nbsp;Kathryn Dudzinski","doi":"10.1016/j.japhpi.2025.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists are efficacious for weight management; however, there are barriers that prevent access. Although studies have shown the efficacy of individual treatments, there is a lack of evidence that compares different classes of weight management medications with each other.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the efficacy of GLP-1 agonists with other classes of weight management medications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective chart review included patients prescribed a weight management medication by a primary care pharmacist at Corewell Health between June 1, 2022, and June 1, 2023. Patients were assigned to (1) the GLP-1 agonist group or (2) the non-GLP-1 agonist group. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who reached ≥ 5% weight loss at the end of the treatment course. The secondary outcomes include the percentage of patients who reached ≥ 10% weight loss and ≥ 15% weight loss at the end of the treatment course and average change in body mass index (BMI) at the end of the treatment course.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A higher number of patients in the GLP-1 agonist group achieved the primary end point of ≥ 5% weight loss compared with the non-GLP-1 agonist group (29 patients [50.9%] vs. 17 patients [30.9%], <em>P</em> = 0.0318). A logistic model was done, which showed that, when accounting for medication duration, the number of patients in the GLP-1 agonist group who reached the primary end point was not statistically significant compared with the non-GLP-1 agonist group with a <em>P</em> value of 0.0772. There was not a statistically significant difference in the number of patients who achieved ≥ 10% and ≥ 15% weight loss between groups, whereas BMI change was statistically significantly greater in the GLP-1 agonist group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A higher percentage of patients in the GLP-1 agonist group reached ≥ 5% weight loss as compared to patients in the non-GLP-1 agonist group, without regard to medication duration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100737,"journal":{"name":"JAPhA Practice Innovations","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAPhA Practice Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949969025000211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists are efficacious for weight management; however, there are barriers that prevent access. Although studies have shown the efficacy of individual treatments, there is a lack of evidence that compares different classes of weight management medications with each other.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of GLP-1 agonists with other classes of weight management medications.

Methods

This retrospective chart review included patients prescribed a weight management medication by a primary care pharmacist at Corewell Health between June 1, 2022, and June 1, 2023. Patients were assigned to (1) the GLP-1 agonist group or (2) the non-GLP-1 agonist group. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who reached ≥ 5% weight loss at the end of the treatment course. The secondary outcomes include the percentage of patients who reached ≥ 10% weight loss and ≥ 15% weight loss at the end of the treatment course and average change in body mass index (BMI) at the end of the treatment course.

Results

A higher number of patients in the GLP-1 agonist group achieved the primary end point of ≥ 5% weight loss compared with the non-GLP-1 agonist group (29 patients [50.9%] vs. 17 patients [30.9%], P = 0.0318). A logistic model was done, which showed that, when accounting for medication duration, the number of patients in the GLP-1 agonist group who reached the primary end point was not statistically significant compared with the non-GLP-1 agonist group with a P value of 0.0772. There was not a statistically significant difference in the number of patients who achieved ≥ 10% and ≥ 15% weight loss between groups, whereas BMI change was statistically significantly greater in the GLP-1 agonist group.

Conclusion

A higher percentage of patients in the GLP-1 agonist group reached ≥ 5% weight loss as compared to patients in the non-GLP-1 agonist group, without regard to medication duration.
GLP-1激动剂与其他体重管理药物在肥胖和超重患者中的疗效
胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)激动剂对体重管理有效;然而,有一些障碍阻碍人们进入。虽然研究表明了个体治疗的有效性,但缺乏证据来比较不同类别的体重管理药物。目的比较GLP-1激动剂与其他体重控制药物的疗效。方法本回顾性图表回顾包括2022年6月1日至2023年6月1日期间Corewell Health初级保健药剂师开具体重管理药物的患者。患者被分配到(1)GLP-1激动剂组或(2)非GLP-1激动剂组。主要结局是在疗程结束时体重减轻≥5%的患者百分比。次要结局包括治疗结束时体重减轻≥10%和≥15%的患者百分比以及治疗结束时体重指数(BMI)的平均变化。结果与非GLP-1激动剂组相比,GLP-1激动剂组达到体重减轻≥5%的主要终点的患者人数较多(29例[50.9%]对17例[30.9%],P = 0.0318)。logistic模型显示,考虑用药时间,GLP-1激动剂组达到主要终点的患者人数与非GLP-1激动剂组相比,P值为0.0772,无统计学意义。两组之间体重减轻≥10%和≥15%的患者数量无统计学差异,而GLP-1激动剂组的BMI变化有统计学意义。结论与服药时间无关,GLP-1激动剂组患者体重减轻≥5%的比例高于非GLP-1激动剂组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信