Determining patient motivators to receiving the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in the community pharmacy setting

Sarah Stetzer, Cherokee Layson-Wolf, Hyunuk Seung, Eric Kim, Vicki Bulkin, Deanna Tran
{"title":"Determining patient motivators to receiving the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in the community pharmacy setting","authors":"Sarah Stetzer,&nbsp;Cherokee Layson-Wolf,&nbsp;Hyunuk Seung,&nbsp;Eric Kim,&nbsp;Vicki Bulkin,&nbsp;Deanna Tran","doi":"10.1016/j.japhpi.2025.100036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A single respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine dose is indicated for all adults 75 years of age and older and adults 60 to 74 years of age if they are at an increased risk of severe RSV disease. It is important for community pharmacists to understand which marketing methods are the key motivators for patients to receive the RSV vaccine given that they are among the most accessible health care professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The primary objective is to determine which marketing methods are the main factors that affect patients’ decisions to receive the RSV vaccine. The secondary objective is to determine which marketing methods influence certain demographics of patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An anonymous, 8-item survey was administered to individuals and data collection occurred from December 2023 to March 2024. The survey collected information about participants’ comorbidities, how participants heard about the RSV vaccine, what marketing tactics were most influential in their decision to receive the RSV vaccine, and other nonmarketing factors that may have motivated participants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-eight surveys were collected and analyzed. More than half of the participants did not report any comorbid conditions (52.1%). The most frequently reported comorbid conditions were diabetes (25%) and chronic lung disease (18.8%). Television, commercials or news (62.5%), and primary care providers (54.2%) were selected as the 2 most frequently reported ways participants had heard about the RSV vaccine. Of all the available marketing methods provided, participants chose primary care providers (41.7%) as having the most influence on their decision to get the RSV vaccine.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings give insight into which marketing methods are more likely to influence patients to receive the RSV vaccine. Primary care providers were found to be the primary motivators for participants to receive the RSV vaccine. This study reinforces the importance of community pharmacists’ partnerships with providers to help increase access to information and receipt of RSV vaccination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100737,"journal":{"name":"JAPhA Practice Innovations","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100036"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAPhA Practice Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949969025000119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A single respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine dose is indicated for all adults 75 years of age and older and adults 60 to 74 years of age if they are at an increased risk of severe RSV disease. It is important for community pharmacists to understand which marketing methods are the key motivators for patients to receive the RSV vaccine given that they are among the most accessible health care professionals.

Objectives

The primary objective is to determine which marketing methods are the main factors that affect patients’ decisions to receive the RSV vaccine. The secondary objective is to determine which marketing methods influence certain demographics of patients.

Methods

An anonymous, 8-item survey was administered to individuals and data collection occurred from December 2023 to March 2024. The survey collected information about participants’ comorbidities, how participants heard about the RSV vaccine, what marketing tactics were most influential in their decision to receive the RSV vaccine, and other nonmarketing factors that may have motivated participants.

Results

Forty-eight surveys were collected and analyzed. More than half of the participants did not report any comorbid conditions (52.1%). The most frequently reported comorbid conditions were diabetes (25%) and chronic lung disease (18.8%). Television, commercials or news (62.5%), and primary care providers (54.2%) were selected as the 2 most frequently reported ways participants had heard about the RSV vaccine. Of all the available marketing methods provided, participants chose primary care providers (41.7%) as having the most influence on their decision to get the RSV vaccine.

Conclusion

These findings give insight into which marketing methods are more likely to influence patients to receive the RSV vaccine. Primary care providers were found to be the primary motivators for participants to receive the RSV vaccine. This study reinforces the importance of community pharmacists’ partnerships with providers to help increase access to information and receipt of RSV vaccination.
确定患者在社区药房接受呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗的动机
单呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)疫苗剂量适用于所有75岁及以上的成年人,以及60至74岁的成年人,如果他们有严重RSV疾病的风险增加。鉴于社区药剂师是最容易接触到的卫生保健专业人员,了解哪种营销方法是促使患者接种RSV疫苗的关键因素是很重要的。目的主要目的是确定哪些营销方法是影响患者决定是否接种RSV疫苗的主要因素。次要目标是确定哪种营销方法会影响某些患者的人口统计数据。方法于2023年12月至2024年3月对个人进行8项匿名调查。调查收集了参与者的合并症、参与者如何听说RSV疫苗、哪种营销策略对他们决定接种RSV疫苗最有影响,以及其他可能激励参与者的非营销因素等信息。结果共收集和分析48份调查问卷。超过一半的参与者没有报告任何合并症(52.1%)。最常见的合并症是糖尿病(25%)和慢性肺病(18.8%)。电视、广告或新闻(62.5%)和初级保健提供者(54.2%)被选为参与者听到RSV疫苗的两种最常报告的方式。在提供的所有可用的营销方法中,参与者选择初级保健提供者(41.7%)对他们是否接种RSV疫苗的决定影响最大。结论这些发现有助于了解哪种营销方式更有可能影响患者接受RSV疫苗。发现初级保健提供者是参与者接受RSV疫苗的主要动机。这项研究强调了社区药剂师与提供者合作的重要性,以帮助增加获得信息和接受RSV疫苗接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信