{"title":"Four Decades of Symbolic Knowledge Extraction from Sub-Symbolic Predictors. A Survey","authors":"Federico Sabbatini","doi":"10.1145/3749097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Issues deriving from the opaque behaviour of prediction-effective, yet non-interpretable, machine learning predictors are being studied and analysed since many decades. One of the main research branches consists of adopting anyway the unintelligible models, thanks to their predictive performance, but queueing to the learning workflow a dedicated technique aimed at post-hoc extracting human-interpretable symbolic knowledge. Following this research line, a growing number of very different knowledge-extraction procedures have been designed over the last four decades, making it difficult for end-users and researches to orient themselves towards the selection of the most suitable one. Accordingly, this survey aims at providing a guide to perform an aware selection of the knowledge-extraction techniques that most probably fit a given task.","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":28.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3749097","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Issues deriving from the opaque behaviour of prediction-effective, yet non-interpretable, machine learning predictors are being studied and analysed since many decades. One of the main research branches consists of adopting anyway the unintelligible models, thanks to their predictive performance, but queueing to the learning workflow a dedicated technique aimed at post-hoc extracting human-interpretable symbolic knowledge. Following this research line, a growing number of very different knowledge-extraction procedures have been designed over the last four decades, making it difficult for end-users and researches to orient themselves towards the selection of the most suitable one. Accordingly, this survey aims at providing a guide to perform an aware selection of the knowledge-extraction techniques that most probably fit a given task.
期刊介绍:
ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods.
ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.