Capturing Emergency Contraceptive Pill Use: Critical Reflections on Measurement and Reporting

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Joe Strong, Ernestina Coast, Jamaica Corker, Michelle Weinberger
{"title":"Capturing Emergency Contraceptive Pill Use: Critical Reflections on Measurement and Reporting","authors":"Joe Strong, Ernestina Coast, Jamaica Corker, Michelle Weinberger","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emergency contraceptive pills (ECP) are an essential and unique postcoital method of preventing pregnancy. Trends in supply data show that sales of ECP are increasing at faster rates globally than many other contraceptives. Yet nationally representative survey data suggest that ECP use has remained relatively static overtime, suggesting significant measure and reporting issues. Accurate measurement of ECP use is critical for informing policies and programs that provide people the choice and freedom to exercise their reproductive rights. There is an urgent need for a revision of ECP measurement to better capture the realities of people's contraceptive needs and desires. In this commentary, we outline the key reasons why surveys may be underreporting and misreporting ECP. We focus on issues around current method‐specific measurements, definition issues around “use” and problems with survey questions and prompt phraseology. We illustrate the importance of recognizing other postcoital methods and strategies that people use when trying to prevent a pregnancy, and the implications this has for ECP measurement. As ECP use evolves, we offer recommendations for survey revisions and further research that can ensure that ECP measurement is robust and able to provide accurate reporting in the future.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergency contraceptive pills (ECP) are an essential and unique postcoital method of preventing pregnancy. Trends in supply data show that sales of ECP are increasing at faster rates globally than many other contraceptives. Yet nationally representative survey data suggest that ECP use has remained relatively static overtime, suggesting significant measure and reporting issues. Accurate measurement of ECP use is critical for informing policies and programs that provide people the choice and freedom to exercise their reproductive rights. There is an urgent need for a revision of ECP measurement to better capture the realities of people's contraceptive needs and desires. In this commentary, we outline the key reasons why surveys may be underreporting and misreporting ECP. We focus on issues around current method‐specific measurements, definition issues around “use” and problems with survey questions and prompt phraseology. We illustrate the importance of recognizing other postcoital methods and strategies that people use when trying to prevent a pregnancy, and the implications this has for ECP measurement. As ECP use evolves, we offer recommendations for survey revisions and further research that can ensure that ECP measurement is robust and able to provide accurate reporting in the future.
捕获紧急避孕药的使用:对测量和报告的关键反思
紧急避孕药(ECP)是一种重要而独特的产后避孕方法。供应数据的趋势表明,全球范围内ECP的销售增长速度比许多其他避孕药具都要快。然而,具有全国代表性的调查数据表明,ECP的使用一直保持相对稳定,这表明存在重大的测量和报告问题。准确测量ECP的使用情况对于为人们提供行使生殖权利的选择和自由的政策和方案至关重要。迫切需要修订ECP测量,以便更好地捕捉人们避孕需求和愿望的现实情况。在这篇评论中,我们概述了调查可能少报和误报ECP的关键原因。我们将重点关注当前特定测量方法的问题,围绕“使用”的定义问题以及调查问题和提示短语的问题。我们说明了认识到人们在试图防止怀孕时使用的其他性交后方法和策略的重要性,以及这对ECP测量的影响。随着ECP使用的发展,我们为调查修订和进一步研究提供建议,以确保ECP测量的可靠性,并能够在未来提供准确的报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信