Risk Factors for Cytomegalovirus Reactivation and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes in Immunocompetent Seropositive Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study.

Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.36519/idcm.2025.480
Hacer Ceylan Çimendağ, Arzu Sayıner, Ali Necati Gökmen, Vildan Avkan-Oğuz
{"title":"Risk Factors for Cytomegalovirus Reactivation and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes in Immunocompetent Seropositive Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Hacer Ceylan Çimendağ, Arzu Sayıner, Ali Necati Gökmen, Vildan Avkan-Oğuz","doi":"10.36519/idcm.2025.480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Monitoring cytomegalovirus (CMV) plasma DNAemia is not used in routine clinical practice for immunocompetent patients. However, immunocompetent patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) may develop transient immunosuppression due to severe illness and its treatment, potentially leading to CMV reactivation. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of CMV reactivation in non-immunocompromised patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients admitted to the Internal Medicine and Anesthesia ICUs were included. CMV-seropositive patients who met inclusion criteria were monitored daily. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed on days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 to determine CMV plasma DNAemia. Patients' data was recorded and analyzed by dividing them into reactivation and non-reactivation groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CMV reactivation occurred in 26 of 146 patients (17.8%), with a mean onset of 10 ± 4.72 days after ICU admission (range: 3-21 days). The reactivation rates in different ICU populations were found to be 31.5% in patients with septic shock, 25% in those with COVID-19, 23.8% in those with sepsis, 18.4% in mechanically ventilated patients, and 11.4% following trauma or surgery. In multivariate analysis, sepsis at ICU admission (odds ratio [OR] 2.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.017-8.157), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score at ICU admission (OR 1.062, 95% CI: 1.003-1.126), and duration of illness before admission (OR 1.048, 95% CI: 1.001-1.097) were independently associated with CMV reactivation. The incidence of fungemia after ICU admission was significantly higher in the group with CMV reactivation. Mortality rates, ICU duration, and hospital stay were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent with previous studies, our findings suggested that the presence of infection, especially sepsis, during ICU admission is the most significant risk factor for CMV reactivation. The identification of sepsis and high APACHE II score as independent risk factors supported the association between severe sepsis-related illness and CMV reactivation. In patients with risk factors, CMV reactivation may serve as a marker of disease severity and the level of immunosuppression.</p>","PeriodicalId":519881,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology","volume":"7 2","pages":"174-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/idcm.2025.480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Monitoring cytomegalovirus (CMV) plasma DNAemia is not used in routine clinical practice for immunocompetent patients. However, immunocompetent patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) may develop transient immunosuppression due to severe illness and its treatment, potentially leading to CMV reactivation. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of CMV reactivation in non-immunocompromised patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Materials and methods: Patients admitted to the Internal Medicine and Anesthesia ICUs were included. CMV-seropositive patients who met inclusion criteria were monitored daily. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed on days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 to determine CMV plasma DNAemia. Patients' data was recorded and analyzed by dividing them into reactivation and non-reactivation groups.

Results: CMV reactivation occurred in 26 of 146 patients (17.8%), with a mean onset of 10 ± 4.72 days after ICU admission (range: 3-21 days). The reactivation rates in different ICU populations were found to be 31.5% in patients with septic shock, 25% in those with COVID-19, 23.8% in those with sepsis, 18.4% in mechanically ventilated patients, and 11.4% following trauma or surgery. In multivariate analysis, sepsis at ICU admission (odds ratio [OR] 2.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.017-8.157), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score at ICU admission (OR 1.062, 95% CI: 1.003-1.126), and duration of illness before admission (OR 1.048, 95% CI: 1.001-1.097) were independently associated with CMV reactivation. The incidence of fungemia after ICU admission was significantly higher in the group with CMV reactivation. Mortality rates, ICU duration, and hospital stay were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion: Consistent with previous studies, our findings suggested that the presence of infection, especially sepsis, during ICU admission is the most significant risk factor for CMV reactivation. The identification of sepsis and high APACHE II score as independent risk factors supported the association between severe sepsis-related illness and CMV reactivation. In patients with risk factors, CMV reactivation may serve as a marker of disease severity and the level of immunosuppression.

重症监护病房免疫能力血清阳性患者巨细胞病毒再激活的危险因素及其对临床结果的影响:一项单中心前瞻性观察研究
目的:检测巨细胞病毒(CMV)血浆脱氧核糖核酸(dna)血症在免疫功能正常的患者中不常用。然而,重症监护病房(ICU)的免疫功能正常的患者可能由于严重的疾病及其治疗而出现短暂的免疫抑制,可能导致巨细胞病毒再激活。本研究旨在调查重症监护病房(ICU)非免疫功能低下患者巨细胞病毒再激活的发生率、危险因素和临床结果。材料和方法:纳入内科和麻醉icu收治的患者。符合纳入标准的cmv血清阳性患者每日监测。在第0、3、7、14、21和28天采用实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测CMV血浆dna血症。将患者数据分为再激活组和非再激活组进行记录和分析。结果:146例患者中有26例(17.8%)发生巨细胞病毒再激活,平均发病时间为ICU入院后10±4.72天(范围:3-21天)。不同ICU人群中感染性休克患者的再激活率为31.5%,新冠肺炎患者为25%,脓毒症患者为23.8%,机械通气患者为18.4%,创伤或手术后患者为11.4%。在多因素分析中,ICU入院时脓毒症(优势比[OR] 2.88, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.017-8.157)、ICU入院时急性生理和慢性健康评估II (APACHE II)评分(OR 1.062, 95% CI: 1.003-1.126)和入院前疾病持续时间(OR 1.048, 95% CI: 1.001-1.097)与CMV再激活独立相关。CMV再激活组ICU入院后真菌血症发生率明显增高。两组之间的死亡率、ICU持续时间和住院时间具有可比性。结论:与以往的研究一致,我们的研究结果表明,ICU入院期间感染,特别是败血症的存在是CMV再激活的最重要危险因素。脓毒症和高APACHE II评分作为独立危险因素的鉴定支持了严重脓毒症相关疾病与巨细胞病毒再激活之间的关联。在有危险因素的患者中,巨细胞病毒再激活可以作为疾病严重程度和免疫抑制水平的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信