Martin Schwarz, Aleš Vícha, Katarína Kuťková, Lenka Krsková, Šárka Bendová, Jana Zarzycka, Petra Hedvičáková, Milan Macek, Markéta Vlčková
{"title":"Utility of Genetic Testing of Various Tissues in Localized Mosaic Neurofibromatosis.","authors":"Martin Schwarz, Aleš Vícha, Katarína Kuťková, Lenka Krsková, Šárka Bendová, Jana Zarzycka, Petra Hedvičáková, Milan Macek, Markéta Vlčková","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neurofibromatosis type 1 is one of the more common rare disorders, and its atypical/segmental or mosaic forms are underdiagnosed. Thus far, only a few dozen cases of localized mosaic neurofibromatosis have undergone combined germline and somatic genetic testing for the NF1 gene.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 65-year-old female patient was referred to our center for multiple neurofibromas on her right shoulder, with a clinical diagnosis of localized mosaic neurofibromatosis. One of the neurofibromas was surgically removed. Massively parallel sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification were utilized to identify the germline and somatic variants in the NF1 gene.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The heterozygous pathogenic NF1 gene variant c.7549C>T and multiple heterozygous intragenic NF1 gene deletions were detected in the DNA taken from the shoulder neurofibroma, but not in the DNA from blood leukocytes or buccal smear.</p><p><strong>Study limitations: </strong>The healthy skin around neurofibromas was not analyzed due to limited available material.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Germline and somatic genetic testing in localized forms of neurofibromatosis are advisable since this facilitates proper genetic counseling regarding risks to offspring, who could inherit a germline pathogenic variant. Another important point to consider is cancer surveillance, which is often underutilized in mosaic forms of neurofibromatosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94367,"journal":{"name":"Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC","volume":"32 4","pages":"205-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Neurofibromatosis type 1 is one of the more common rare disorders, and its atypical/segmental or mosaic forms are underdiagnosed. Thus far, only a few dozen cases of localized mosaic neurofibromatosis have undergone combined germline and somatic genetic testing for the NF1 gene.
Methods: A 65-year-old female patient was referred to our center for multiple neurofibromas on her right shoulder, with a clinical diagnosis of localized mosaic neurofibromatosis. One of the neurofibromas was surgically removed. Massively parallel sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification were utilized to identify the germline and somatic variants in the NF1 gene.
Results: The heterozygous pathogenic NF1 gene variant c.7549C>T and multiple heterozygous intragenic NF1 gene deletions were detected in the DNA taken from the shoulder neurofibroma, but not in the DNA from blood leukocytes or buccal smear.
Study limitations: The healthy skin around neurofibromas was not analyzed due to limited available material.
Conclusion: Germline and somatic genetic testing in localized forms of neurofibromatosis are advisable since this facilitates proper genetic counseling regarding risks to offspring, who could inherit a germline pathogenic variant. Another important point to consider is cancer surveillance, which is often underutilized in mosaic forms of neurofibromatosis.