Total joint arthroplasty versus trapeziectomy for trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis: 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.6
Elske E D J Bonhof-Jansen, Tjeerd R de Jong, Sander M Brink, Ramon P de Wildt, Paul M N Werker
{"title":"Total joint arthroplasty versus trapeziectomy for trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis: 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Elske E D J Bonhof-Jansen, Tjeerd R de Jong, Sander M Brink, Ramon P de Wildt, Paul M N Werker","doi":"10.1177/17531934251357456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study presents 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with the Maïa prosthesis and trapeziectomy for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Sixty-two women aged 40 and older scheduled for surgery were randomized. The primary outcome was daily hand function using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ). Secondary outcomes included MHOQ subscales, range of motion, strength, satisfaction, complications and survival. Follow-up data were available for 28 TJA and 26 trapeziectomy patients. At 5-years, TJA did not show superior patient reported outcomes on the MHOQ compared with trapeziectomy. Grip and tip pinch strength differences were not statistically significant or clinically relevant. However, key pinch strength, satisfaction and willingness to undergo the same treatment again favoured TJA. There was no statistically significant difference in revision rates between the groups. Five-year survival was 73% for trapeziectomy and 93% for TJA.<b>Level of evidence:</b> I.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"17531934251357456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251357456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with the Maïa prosthesis and trapeziectomy for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Sixty-two women aged 40 and older scheduled for surgery were randomized. The primary outcome was daily hand function using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ). Secondary outcomes included MHOQ subscales, range of motion, strength, satisfaction, complications and survival. Follow-up data were available for 28 TJA and 26 trapeziectomy patients. At 5-years, TJA did not show superior patient reported outcomes on the MHOQ compared with trapeziectomy. Grip and tip pinch strength differences were not statistically significant or clinically relevant. However, key pinch strength, satisfaction and willingness to undergo the same treatment again favoured TJA. There was no statistically significant difference in revision rates between the groups. Five-year survival was 73% for trapeziectomy and 93% for TJA.Level of evidence: I.

全关节置换术与梯形切除术治疗梯形腕关节关节炎:一项随机对照试验的5年随访。
本研究报告了一项为期5年的随机对照试验结果,比较了全关节置换术(TJA)与Maïa假体和梯形骨切除术治疗斜跖骨性关节炎的疗效。62名年龄在40岁及以上的女性计划进行手术。主要观察指标为每日手部功能,采用密歇根手部结果问卷(MHOQ)。次要结局包括MHOQ量表、活动范围、力量、满意度、并发症和生存率。28例TJA患者和26例梯形切除术患者的随访数据。在5年时,与梯形切除术相比,TJA并没有显示出更好的患者报告的MHOQ结果。握力和指尖握力差异无统计学意义或临床相关性。然而,关键捏紧强度,满意度和接受相同治疗的意愿再次有利于TJA。两组复习率无统计学差异。梯形切除术的5年生存率为73%,TJA的5年生存率为93%。证据等级:1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信