The Enablers and Barriers to Accessing Women's Health and Wellbeing Services for Women Aged 40-65 Years: A Qualitative Study.

Kiersten Simmons, Jenny Hyde, Damla Harmanci, Collins Iwuji, Stephen Bremner, Carrie Llewellyn
{"title":"The Enablers and Barriers to Accessing Women's Health and Wellbeing Services for Women Aged 40-65 Years: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Kiersten Simmons, Jenny Hyde, Damla Harmanci, Collins Iwuji, Stephen Bremner, Carrie Llewellyn","doi":"10.1177/2752535X251358919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Midlife women, aged 40-65 years, are an under-researched population with poor and inequitable access to Women's Health and Wellbeing Services (WHWS). This study, which was supported by a Patient and Public Involvement group, explored the enablers and barriers to WHWS, with a focus on sexual health and wellbeing services, cervical and breast screening, menopause care, contraception, and incontinence services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured focus groups and interviews were conducted with sixty self-identifying women and gender non-binary participants aged 40-65 years living in the South-East of England. Recruitment was focused in underserved geographic areas and in underserved groups. Framework Analysis, also using the Socioecological Model, through an intersectionality lens, was used to analyse the enablers and barriers to WHWS. A feminist pragmatist approach was employed to interlink the findings into suggestions to improve access. The study was reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three main themes emerged: the lack of prioritisation of midlife women; the widespread deficits in knowledge of the needs of midlife women; and the impact of stigma on access to care, particularly sexual health and genitourinary syndrome of menopause services. The intersectional disadvantage of belonging to underserved groups for example due to ethnicity, income, and disability, overlapped across the themes. Participants advocated for integrated, holistic, community-based, women-only services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research, education, and policy investment is required to address the complex, and often highly sensitive nature of many health and wellbeing issues that face midlife women. These challenges are compounded by belonging to an underserved group.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X251358919"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X251358919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Midlife women, aged 40-65 years, are an under-researched population with poor and inequitable access to Women's Health and Wellbeing Services (WHWS). This study, which was supported by a Patient and Public Involvement group, explored the enablers and barriers to WHWS, with a focus on sexual health and wellbeing services, cervical and breast screening, menopause care, contraception, and incontinence services.

Methods: Semi-structured focus groups and interviews were conducted with sixty self-identifying women and gender non-binary participants aged 40-65 years living in the South-East of England. Recruitment was focused in underserved geographic areas and in underserved groups. Framework Analysis, also using the Socioecological Model, through an intersectionality lens, was used to analyse the enablers and barriers to WHWS. A feminist pragmatist approach was employed to interlink the findings into suggestions to improve access. The study was reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).

Results: Three main themes emerged: the lack of prioritisation of midlife women; the widespread deficits in knowledge of the needs of midlife women; and the impact of stigma on access to care, particularly sexual health and genitourinary syndrome of menopause services. The intersectional disadvantage of belonging to underserved groups for example due to ethnicity, income, and disability, overlapped across the themes. Participants advocated for integrated, holistic, community-based, women-only services.

Conclusion: Further research, education, and policy investment is required to address the complex, and often highly sensitive nature of many health and wellbeing issues that face midlife women. These challenges are compounded by belonging to an underserved group.

40-65岁妇女获得妇女保健和福利服务的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
引言:40-65岁的中年妇女是一个研究不足的人群,她们获得妇女健康和福利服务(WHWS)的机会很差,而且不公平。这项研究得到了患者和公众参与小组的支持,探讨了WHWS的推动因素和障碍,重点是性健康和福利服务、宫颈和乳房筛查、更年期护理、避孕和失禁服务。方法:对居住在英格兰东南部的60名年龄在40-65岁、自我认同的女性和性别非二元的参与者进行了半结构化的焦点小组和访谈。招聘的重点是服务不足的地区和服务不足的群体。框架分析,也使用社会生态模型,通过交叉性镜头,用于分析WHWS的促成因素和障碍。采用女权主义实用主义的方法,将调查结果与改善获取的建议联系起来。该研究是根据报告定性研究的综合标准(COREQ)进行报告的。结果:出现了三个主要主题:缺乏对中年妇女的优先考虑;普遍缺乏对中年妇女需求的了解;以及污名化对获得护理的影响,特别是性健康和更年期泌尿生殖系统综合症服务。由于种族、收入和残疾等原因而属于服务不足群体的交叉劣势在各个主题之间重叠。与会者主张提供综合、全面、以社区为基础的妇女专属服务。结论:需要进一步的研究、教育和政策投资,以解决中年妇女面临的许多复杂且往往高度敏感的健康和福祉问题。由于属于服务不足的群体,这些挑战更加复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信