Comparative characterisation of different types of Gafchromic films for radiotherapy use.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Tarafder Shameem, Nick Bennie, Martin Butson, David Thwaites
{"title":"Comparative characterisation of different types of Gafchromic films for radiotherapy use.","authors":"Tarafder Shameem, Nick Bennie, Martin Butson, David Thwaites","doi":"10.1007/s13246-025-01596-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different types of Gafchromic films, for radiotherapy use, are recommended for different dose ranges. Ashland Specialty Ingredients has aimed to continuously develop its products to improve their practical application. Thus, EBT3 was replaced by EBT4, intended to provide better signal to noise ratio (SNR); while MD-V3 was introduced for use at higher dose ranges, in addition to EBT-XD. At present there are limited studies on MD-V3. This study aimed to investigate some relevant characteristics of EBT4 and MD-V3, compared with those of EBT3 and EBT-XD. The parameters investigated were dose response, optical density change with post-irradiation time, orientation effect, signal to noise ratio, polarisation, and lateral response artefact (LRA). EBT4 is similar to EBT3 however it provides better SNR and larger response change with post-irradiation time. EBT-XD and MD-V3 are recommended by the suppliers for high dose range, although the sensitivity curves show that EBT3 and EBT4 could also be used for relatively high dose ranges. All films have orientation effects, with EBT3 the worst. An important characteristic of MD-V3 is that the LRA remains similar, irrespective of delivered dose. These comparative characteristics are intended to be informative for clinical practice involving Gafchromic film use in high dose therapy applications. Recommendations from this study are to use EBT4 for dosimetry in lower-dose applications, provided that both calibration and clinical timings post-irradiation are kept similar, while MD-V3 is the preferred film for high-dose procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01596-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different types of Gafchromic films, for radiotherapy use, are recommended for different dose ranges. Ashland Specialty Ingredients has aimed to continuously develop its products to improve their practical application. Thus, EBT3 was replaced by EBT4, intended to provide better signal to noise ratio (SNR); while MD-V3 was introduced for use at higher dose ranges, in addition to EBT-XD. At present there are limited studies on MD-V3. This study aimed to investigate some relevant characteristics of EBT4 and MD-V3, compared with those of EBT3 and EBT-XD. The parameters investigated were dose response, optical density change with post-irradiation time, orientation effect, signal to noise ratio, polarisation, and lateral response artefact (LRA). EBT4 is similar to EBT3 however it provides better SNR and larger response change with post-irradiation time. EBT-XD and MD-V3 are recommended by the suppliers for high dose range, although the sensitivity curves show that EBT3 and EBT4 could also be used for relatively high dose ranges. All films have orientation effects, with EBT3 the worst. An important characteristic of MD-V3 is that the LRA remains similar, irrespective of delivered dose. These comparative characteristics are intended to be informative for clinical practice involving Gafchromic film use in high dose therapy applications. Recommendations from this study are to use EBT4 for dosimetry in lower-dose applications, provided that both calibration and clinical timings post-irradiation are kept similar, while MD-V3 is the preferred film for high-dose procedures.

不同类型放射治疗用钆致变色膜的比较特性。
不同类型的钆致变色膜,用于放射治疗,建议在不同的剂量范围。亚什兰特种配料旨在不断开发其产品,以提高其实际应用。因此,EBT3被EBT4取代,旨在提供更好的信噪比(SNR);而除了EBT-XD之外,MD-V3被引入用于更高剂量范围。目前对MD-V3的研究有限。本研究旨在探讨EBT4和MD-V3的相关特征,并与EBT3和EBT-XD进行比较。研究的参数包括剂量响应、光密度随辐照后时间的变化、取向效应、信噪比、极化和侧响应伪影(LRA)。EBT4与EBT3相似,但具有更好的信噪比和更大的辐照后响应变化。虽然灵敏度曲线显示EBT3和EBT4也可以用于相对高的剂量范围,但供应商推荐EBT-XD和MD-V3用于高剂量范围。所有薄膜都有定向效应,以EBT3薄膜效果最差。MD-V3的一个重要特征是,无论给药剂量如何,LRA保持相似。这些比较特征旨在为临床实践提供信息,包括在高剂量治疗中使用钆致变色膜。本研究建议在低剂量应用中使用EBT4进行剂量测定,前提是辐照后的校准时间和临床时间保持相似,而MD-V3是高剂量应用的首选膜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信