Workload and Staffing Study of Hospital Cancer Registries.

Q4 Medicine
Journal of registry management Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Susan A Chapman, Laurie Hailer, Jacqueline Miller
{"title":"Workload and Staffing Study of Hospital Cancer Registries.","authors":"Susan A Chapman, Laurie Hailer, Jacqueline Miller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the workload and staffing study of hospital cancer registries conducted in 2024 was to update previous studies of workload and staffing guidelines. The population studied was composed of hospital cancer registries. Potential respondents for this study were hospital registry leads identified in the National Cancer Registrars Association (NCRA) membership database and their cancer registry staff. An online survey was sent to lead registrars along with directions for forwarding a separate cancer registrar survey to their staff. Postsurvey interviews were conducted with 11 experts in the field to review findings and discuss the future of the cancer registry workforce. There were 237 responses to the registry lead survey (RLS) and 290 responses to the cancer registrar survey (CRS). Results indicated a 22% increase in the mean budgeted full-time equivalents (FTEs) from 2019 in 2022; yet filled FTEs decreased slightly from 2019 to 2022. Registry leads reported that nearly half of their staff need additional training in data analysis and were very concerned about recruiting qualified staff, providing adequate compensation, and funding additional positions. Caseload continued to be the main predictor of staffing needs, as in the previous study. In staffing models, we found that for single-institution registries, for every 1,000 cases, staffing should increase by 1.8 to 2.1 FTEs. For multi-institution registries, staffing should increase by 1.6 to 1.9 FTEs for every 1,000 cases. Postsurvey interviewees were concerned about industry-wide vacancies and worker burnout. They mentioned contributing factors such as low wages, lack of recognition, isolated work, the lack of credentialed registrars, and pending retirements. They stressed that technological innovations and automation will not eliminate the registrar's role but will change it. These changes in registrar work may create more specialization in the role such as in data analytics and acting on real-time data and reporting. These changes may also create new career paths that would attract future students and workers to the cancer registry profession. Findings from this study may be useful for hospital registries to benchmark their own workload and staffing and to cancer registry organization leaders in planning for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":39246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of registry management","volume":"52 1","pages":"16-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of registry management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the workload and staffing study of hospital cancer registries conducted in 2024 was to update previous studies of workload and staffing guidelines. The population studied was composed of hospital cancer registries. Potential respondents for this study were hospital registry leads identified in the National Cancer Registrars Association (NCRA) membership database and their cancer registry staff. An online survey was sent to lead registrars along with directions for forwarding a separate cancer registrar survey to their staff. Postsurvey interviews were conducted with 11 experts in the field to review findings and discuss the future of the cancer registry workforce. There were 237 responses to the registry lead survey (RLS) and 290 responses to the cancer registrar survey (CRS). Results indicated a 22% increase in the mean budgeted full-time equivalents (FTEs) from 2019 in 2022; yet filled FTEs decreased slightly from 2019 to 2022. Registry leads reported that nearly half of their staff need additional training in data analysis and were very concerned about recruiting qualified staff, providing adequate compensation, and funding additional positions. Caseload continued to be the main predictor of staffing needs, as in the previous study. In staffing models, we found that for single-institution registries, for every 1,000 cases, staffing should increase by 1.8 to 2.1 FTEs. For multi-institution registries, staffing should increase by 1.6 to 1.9 FTEs for every 1,000 cases. Postsurvey interviewees were concerned about industry-wide vacancies and worker burnout. They mentioned contributing factors such as low wages, lack of recognition, isolated work, the lack of credentialed registrars, and pending retirements. They stressed that technological innovations and automation will not eliminate the registrar's role but will change it. These changes in registrar work may create more specialization in the role such as in data analytics and acting on real-time data and reporting. These changes may also create new career paths that would attract future students and workers to the cancer registry profession. Findings from this study may be useful for hospital registries to benchmark their own workload and staffing and to cancer registry organization leaders in planning for the future.

医院癌症登记处的工作量及人手编制研究。
在2024年进行的医院癌症登记处工作量和人员配置研究的目的是更新以前关于工作量和人员配置指南的研究。研究人群由医院癌症登记处组成。本研究的潜在调查对象是在国家癌症登记协会(NCRA)会员数据库中确定的医院登记领导及其癌症登记工作人员。一份在线调查被发送给了主要的注册商,同时还附上了将一份单独的癌症注册商调查转发给其员工的指示。调查后与11位该领域的专家进行了访谈,以回顾调查结果并讨论癌症登记处工作人员的未来。登记领导调查(RLS)有237份回复,癌症登记调查(CRS)有290份回复。结果显示,2022年预算的平均全职当量(fte)比2019年增加22%;但从2019年到2022年,全职员工人数略有下降。登记处负责人报告说,近一半的工作人员需要额外的数据分析培训,并且非常关心招聘合格的工作人员,提供足够的补偿,并资助额外的职位。与以前的研究一样,工作量仍然是工作人员需求的主要预测指标。在人手模式方面,我们发现就单一院校的资料库而言,每1,000宗个案,人手应增加1.8至2.1名全职教员。在多机构注册处,每1,000宗个案应增加1.6至1.9名全职教员。调查后的受访者担心整个行业的职位空缺和员工倦怠。他们提到了诸如低工资、缺乏认可、孤立的工作、缺乏合格的登记员以及即将退休等因素。他们强调,技术革新和自动化不会消除书记官长的作用,但会改变它。注册商工作的这些变化可能会使角色更加专业化,例如数据分析和对实时数据和报告的处理。这些变化也可能创造新的职业道路,吸引未来的学生和工作人员从事癌症登记专业。本研究的发现可能有助于医院注册机构对自己的工作量和人员配备进行基准测试,也可能有助于癌症注册机构的领导者规划未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of registry management
Journal of registry management Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信