Simulated Biomechanical Analysis of Optimal Knee Alignment for Treating Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-11 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251344944
Takaaki Hiranaka, Adam Garry Redgrift, Yizhao Li, Larissa Michele Madia, Ryan Willing, Alan Getgood
{"title":"Simulated Biomechanical Analysis of Optimal Knee Alignment for Treating Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears.","authors":"Takaaki Hiranaka, Adam Garry Redgrift, Yizhao Li, Larissa Michele Madia, Ryan Willing, Alan Getgood","doi":"10.1177/23259671251344944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) is used to correct varus alignment; however, the optimal knee alignment during MOWHTO for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the optimal biomechanical knee alignment for MMPRT treatment during MOWHTO.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric legs from human donors (mean age, 61.3 years [range, 33-75 years]). A joint motion simulator assessed the weightbearing line (WBL) from 30% to 70% (0%: medial border; 100%: lateral border), simulating MOWHTO. Tibiofemoral peak contact pressure (PCP) and mean contact pressure (MCP) were measured using a pressure sensor under a 700-N load. MMPRTs were created via a femoral posterior approach and repaired with suture anchors. Measurements were taken in the intact, MMPRT, and repair conditions at alignments of 30% to 70% WBL, with neutral alignment defined as 50% WBL. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance with the Tukey post hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the medial compartment, PCP was increased by 43% in the MMPRT condition compared with the intact condition at neutral alignment (<i>P</i> = .012). MCP was also significantly increased by 57% in the MMPRT condition compared with the intact condition (<i>P</i> = .006). At varus alignment, PCP and MCP increased in all conditions, with the largest statistically significant differences observed at 30% WBL (<i>P</i> = .002 and <i>P</i> < .001, respectively). PCP and MCP at neutral alignment in the intact condition were comparable with those at 60% to 65% WBL in the MMPRT condition and at 50% to 55% WBL in the repair condition. In the lateral compartment, PCP and MCP increased at valgus alignment, with no significant differences among conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MCP at neutral alignment in the intact condition was similar to that at 60% to 65% WBL in the MMPRT condition and at 50% to 55% WBL in the repair condition, indicating optimal biomechanical alignment targets for MOWHTO in patients with MMPRTs. 50-55% WBL corresponds to slight valgus alignment. Neutral alignment was not considered ideal in this context.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These findings provide biomechanical evidence to guide optimal knee alignment during MOWHTO for MMPRTs, potentially improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 7","pages":"23259671251344944"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251344944","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) is used to correct varus alignment; however, the optimal knee alignment during MOWHTO for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) remains unclear.

Purpose: To determine the optimal biomechanical knee alignment for MMPRT treatment during MOWHTO.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: This study used 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric legs from human donors (mean age, 61.3 years [range, 33-75 years]). A joint motion simulator assessed the weightbearing line (WBL) from 30% to 70% (0%: medial border; 100%: lateral border), simulating MOWHTO. Tibiofemoral peak contact pressure (PCP) and mean contact pressure (MCP) were measured using a pressure sensor under a 700-N load. MMPRTs were created via a femoral posterior approach and repaired with suture anchors. Measurements were taken in the intact, MMPRT, and repair conditions at alignments of 30% to 70% WBL, with neutral alignment defined as 50% WBL. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance with the Tukey post hoc test.

Results: In the medial compartment, PCP was increased by 43% in the MMPRT condition compared with the intact condition at neutral alignment (P = .012). MCP was also significantly increased by 57% in the MMPRT condition compared with the intact condition (P = .006). At varus alignment, PCP and MCP increased in all conditions, with the largest statistically significant differences observed at 30% WBL (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively). PCP and MCP at neutral alignment in the intact condition were comparable with those at 60% to 65% WBL in the MMPRT condition and at 50% to 55% WBL in the repair condition. In the lateral compartment, PCP and MCP increased at valgus alignment, with no significant differences among conditions.

Conclusion: MCP at neutral alignment in the intact condition was similar to that at 60% to 65% WBL in the MMPRT condition and at 50% to 55% WBL in the repair condition, indicating optimal biomechanical alignment targets for MOWHTO in patients with MMPRTs. 50-55% WBL corresponds to slight valgus alignment. Neutral alignment was not considered ideal in this context.

Clinical relevance: These findings provide biomechanical evidence to guide optimal knee alignment during MOWHTO for MMPRTs, potentially improving patient outcomes.

最佳膝关节对齐治疗内侧半月板后根撕裂的模拟生物力学分析。
背景:内侧开楔形胫骨高位截骨术(MOWHTO)用于矫正内翻对准;然而,在内侧半月板后根撕裂(MMPRTs)的MOWHTO中,最佳的膝关节对齐方式仍不清楚。目的:确定MOWHTO期间MMPRT治疗的最佳生物力学膝关节对齐方式。研究设计:实验室对照研究。方法:本研究使用10例人类供体新鲜冷冻尸体腿(平均年龄61.3岁[范围33-75岁])。关节运动模拟器评估负重线(WBL)从30%到70%(0%:内侧边界;100%:侧边),模拟MOWHTO。在700-N负荷下,使用压力传感器测量胫骨股骨峰值接触压力(PCP)和平均接触压力(MCP)。MMPRTs通过股骨后路入路制作,并用缝合锚钉修复。测量在30% - 70% WBL的完整、MMPRT和修复条件下进行,中性对齐定义为50% WBL。统计分析采用单向方差分析和Tukey事后检验。结果:内侧室PCP在MMPRT条件下比中性对齐时完整条件下增加43% (P = 0.012)。与完整组相比,MMPRT组MCP也显著增加了57% (P = 0.006)。内翻矫正时,PCP和MCP在所有情况下均升高,其中30% WBL时差异最大(P = 0.002和P < 0.001)。完整条件下中性对准的PCP和MCP与MMPRT条件下60%至65% WBL和修复条件下50%至55% WBL的PCP和MCP相当。在侧室,外翻对准时PCP和MCP增加,不同条件间无显著差异。结论:完整条件下中性对齐时的MCP与MMPRT条件下60% ~ 65% WBL和修复条件下50% ~ 55% WBL时的MCP相似,表明MMPRT患者MOWHTO的最佳生物力学对齐目标。50-55% WBL对应轻微外翻对准。在这种情况下,中立对齐被认为是不理想的。临床相关性:这些发现提供了生物力学证据来指导MMPRTs在MOWHTO期间最佳的膝关节对齐,潜在地改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信