Evaluating the Impact of a Modified AVADE Program on Health Care Workers' Confidence in Managing Patient Agitation [Formula: see text].

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Jessica Cappucci, Lisa Gouldthorpe
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of a Modified AVADE Program on Health Care Workers' Confidence in Managing Patient Agitation [Formula: see text].","authors":"Jessica Cappucci, Lisa Gouldthorpe","doi":"10.1177/10783903251351986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background In the United States, it is estimated that 75% of healthcare workers report encountering workplace violence. Assaults on healthcare workers are associated with increased turnover rates, job dissatisfaction, trauma, and an inability to complete job tasks.AimsThe purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the effectiveness of an education program to increase healthcare workers' knowledge and confidence in managing agitation and violence.MethodsThe project used a single group, pre- and post-test design to evaluate an educational intervention, a modified Awareness, Vigilance, Avoidance, Defense, and Escape/Environment (AVADE) program, using the Confidence in Coping with Patient Aggression Instrument (CCPAI), a 30-day post-intervention follow-up, and a post-violent incident follow-up. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired <i>t</i>-tests, and qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis of an open-response question on the post-violence and 30-day follow-up surveys.ResultsThackery's CCPAI was completed by 130 participants, across 20 different departments, and 13 job titles. The modified AVADE program was found to increase confidence among healthcare workers when coping with patient aggression.ConclusionAn educational intervention emphasizing de-escalation techniques, situational awareness, self-defense, appropriate restraint use, legal considerations, and case studies increased healthcare workers' confidence in managing patient aggression. According to a 30-day follow-up survey, staff members applied at least one of the strategies taught during the course to handle violent incidents within a month of completing the training.</p>","PeriodicalId":17229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","volume":" ","pages":"10783903251351986"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903251351986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In the United States, it is estimated that 75% of healthcare workers report encountering workplace violence. Assaults on healthcare workers are associated with increased turnover rates, job dissatisfaction, trauma, and an inability to complete job tasks.AimsThe purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the effectiveness of an education program to increase healthcare workers' knowledge and confidence in managing agitation and violence.MethodsThe project used a single group, pre- and post-test design to evaluate an educational intervention, a modified Awareness, Vigilance, Avoidance, Defense, and Escape/Environment (AVADE) program, using the Confidence in Coping with Patient Aggression Instrument (CCPAI), a 30-day post-intervention follow-up, and a post-violent incident follow-up. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests, and qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis of an open-response question on the post-violence and 30-day follow-up surveys.ResultsThackery's CCPAI was completed by 130 participants, across 20 different departments, and 13 job titles. The modified AVADE program was found to increase confidence among healthcare workers when coping with patient aggression.ConclusionAn educational intervention emphasizing de-escalation techniques, situational awareness, self-defense, appropriate restraint use, legal considerations, and case studies increased healthcare workers' confidence in managing patient aggression. According to a 30-day follow-up survey, staff members applied at least one of the strategies taught during the course to handle violent incidents within a month of completing the training.

评估修改后的AVADE程序对医护人员管理患者躁动的信心的影响[公式:见文本]。
在美国,据估计有75%的医护人员报告遭遇过工作场所暴力。对卫生保健工作者的攻击与离职率增加、工作不满、创伤和无法完成工作任务有关。这一质量改进项目的目的是评估一项教育方案的有效性,该方案旨在提高保健工作者在管理激动和暴力方面的知识和信心。方法本研究采用单组、前后测试设计,对教育干预、改进的意识、警惕、回避、防御和逃避/环境(AVADE)计划、应对患者攻击的信心量表(CCPAI)、干预后30天随访和暴力事件后随访进行评估。定量数据采用描述性统计和配对t检验进行分析,定性数据采用暴力后开放性问题和30天随访调查的内容分析进行分析。结果萨克雷的CCPAI由130名参与者完成,他们来自20个不同的部门和13个职位。修改后的AVADE程序被发现增加了医护人员在应对患者攻击时的信心。结论强调降级技术、情境意识、自卫、适当约束使用、法律考虑和案例研究的教育干预提高了医护人员管理患者攻击行为的信心。根据一项为期30天的后续调查,工作人员在完成培训后的一个月内至少应用了课程中教授的一种策略来处理暴力事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal publishing up-to-date information to promote psychiatric nursing, improve mental health care for culturally diverse individuals, families, groups, and communities, as well as shape health care policy for the delivery of mental health services. JAPNA publishes both clinical and research articles relevant to psychiatric nursing. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信