Effectiveness and Safety of Intramyocardial Needle Ablation for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia and Premature Ventricular Complexes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kartik Gupta, Muhammad Ahmad Qureshi, Bharat Rawlley, Vardhmaan Jain, Atul Verma, Konstantinos C Siontis, Abhishekh Deskhmukh, Arfaat Khan, Mohamad Raad
{"title":"Effectiveness and Safety of Intramyocardial Needle Ablation for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia and Premature Ventricular Complexes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Kartik Gupta, Muhammad Ahmad Qureshi, Bharat Rawlley, Vardhmaan Jain, Atul Verma, Konstantinos C Siontis, Abhishekh Deskhmukh, Arfaat Khan, Mohamad Raad","doi":"10.1111/jce.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intramyocardial needle ablation is a novel technique for treating refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular complexes (PVC). However, studies defining the effectiveness and safety of this procedure are limited. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of needle ablation for VT and PVC refractory to standard ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, Ovid (includes Medline), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to December 31, 2024. Human studies on needle ablation for recurrent VT and PVC were included. Primary outcome was immediate effectiveness (no immediate post-procedural inducible VT or PVC). Secondary outcomes were long-term effectiveness (no clinical VT or PVC at 6 months) and safety (composite measure of peri- and post-procedural complications).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of five studies including 180 patients (140 VT; 40 PVC) were analyzed. Mean ages ranged from 54 to 66 years. Among 129 patients with VT, immediate effectiveness was 75% (95% CI, 54-92; I<sup>2</sup> 80%), and cumulative freedom from clinical VT dropped to 43% at 6 months (95% CI, 35-52; I<sup>2</sup> 0%). Among 40 patients with PVC, immediate effectiveness was 82% (95% CI, 67-94; I<sup>2</sup> 0%), and long-term effectiveness was 76% (95% CI, 61-90; I<sup>2</sup> 0%). Safety outcomes were reported in 19% of patients (95% CI, 13-27; I<sup>2</sup> 0%) and 10% of patients (95% CI 1, 23; I<sup>2</sup> 0%) in the VT and PVC arm, respectively. Death related to ablation was report in 7 patients (5.0%) only in the VT studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intramyocardial needle ablation is an emerging alternative approach for refractory VT and PVC ablation, showing cautious but promising results and safety profiles. Prospective studies and an international registry could provide valuable insights needed for optimal patient selection and protocol refinement.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intramyocardial needle ablation is a novel technique for treating refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular complexes (PVC). However, studies defining the effectiveness and safety of this procedure are limited. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of needle ablation for VT and PVC refractory to standard ablation.

Methods: Embase, Ovid (includes Medline), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to December 31, 2024. Human studies on needle ablation for recurrent VT and PVC were included. Primary outcome was immediate effectiveness (no immediate post-procedural inducible VT or PVC). Secondary outcomes were long-term effectiveness (no clinical VT or PVC at 6 months) and safety (composite measure of peri- and post-procedural complications).

Results: A total of five studies including 180 patients (140 VT; 40 PVC) were analyzed. Mean ages ranged from 54 to 66 years. Among 129 patients with VT, immediate effectiveness was 75% (95% CI, 54-92; I2 80%), and cumulative freedom from clinical VT dropped to 43% at 6 months (95% CI, 35-52; I2 0%). Among 40 patients with PVC, immediate effectiveness was 82% (95% CI, 67-94; I2 0%), and long-term effectiveness was 76% (95% CI, 61-90; I2 0%). Safety outcomes were reported in 19% of patients (95% CI, 13-27; I2 0%) and 10% of patients (95% CI 1, 23; I2 0%) in the VT and PVC arm, respectively. Death related to ablation was report in 7 patients (5.0%) only in the VT studies.

Conclusion: Intramyocardial needle ablation is an emerging alternative approach for refractory VT and PVC ablation, showing cautious but promising results and safety profiles. Prospective studies and an international registry could provide valuable insights needed for optimal patient selection and protocol refinement.

心内针消融治疗难治性室性心动过速和室性早搏复合物的有效性和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
心内针消融是一种治疗难治性室性心动过速(VT)和室性早衰(PVC)的新技术。然而,关于这种方法的有效性和安全性的研究是有限的。本荟萃分析旨在评价针刺消融治疗标准消融难治的室性心动过速和聚氯乙烯的安全性和有效性。方法:检索Embase、Ovid(包括Medline)和ClinicalTrials.gov从成立到2024年12月31日。包括针消融治疗复发性室性心动过速和聚氯乙烯的人体研究。主要结果是立即有效(没有立即的术后诱导性VT或PVC)。次要结果是长期有效性(6个月时无临床VT或PVC)和安全性(手术前后并发症的综合测量)。结果:共5项研究,包括180例患者(140 VT;40个PVC)进行分析。平均年龄54 - 66岁。在129例VT患者中,即刻疗效为75% (95% CI, 54-92;I2为80%),6个月时临床VT的累积自由度降至43% (95% CI, 35-52;I2 0%)。在40例PVC患者中,即刻疗效为82% (95% CI, 67-94;I2 0%),长期疗效为76% (95% CI, 61-90;I2 0%)。19%的患者报告了安全结果(95% CI, 13-27;I2 0%)和10%的患者(95% CI 1,23;VT臂和PVC臂分别为i2%。仅在VT研究中报告了7例(5.0%)与消融相关的死亡。结论:心内针消融是一种新兴的难治性室性心动过速和PVC消融的替代方法,显示出谨慎但有希望的结果和安全性。前瞻性研究和国际注册可以为最佳患者选择和方案改进提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信