Unpacking WHO and CDC Bottle Bioassay Methods: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Protocol Analysis Revealing Key Outcome Predictors.

Gates Open Research Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/gatesopenres.15433.2
Giorgio Praulins, Annabel Murphy-Fegan, Jack Gillespie, Frank Mechan, Katherine Gleave, Rosemary Lees
{"title":"Unpacking WHO and CDC Bottle Bioassay Methods: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Protocol Analysis Revealing Key Outcome Predictors.","authors":"Giorgio Praulins, Annabel Murphy-Fegan, Jack Gillespie, Frank Mechan, Katherine Gleave, Rosemary Lees","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.15433.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resistance monitoring is a key element in controlling vector-borne diseases. The World Health Organization (WHO) and Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have each developed bottle bioassay methods for determining insecticide susceptibility in mosquito vectors which are used globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to identify variations in bottle bioassay methodologies and assess the potential impact on the data that is generated. Our approach involved a systematic examination of existing literature and protocols from WHO and CDC, with a focus on the specifics of reported methodologies, variation between versions, and reported outcomes. Building on this, we experimentally evaluated the impact of several variables on bioassay results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our literature review exposed a significant inconsistency in the how bioassay methods are reported, hindering reliable interpretation of data and the ability to compare results between studies. The experimental research provided further insight by specifically identifying two key factors that influence the outcomes of bioassays: mosquito dry weight and relative humidity (RH). This finding not only advances our comprehension of these assays but also underscores the importance of establishing precisely defined methodologies for resistance monitoring. The study also demonstrates the importance of controlling bioassay variables, noting the significant influence of wing length, as an indicator of mosquito size, on mortality rates in standardized bioassays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generating data with improved protocol consistency and precision will not only deepen our understanding of resistance patterns but also better inform vector control measures. We call for continued research and collaboration to refine and build consensus on bioassay techniques, to help bolster the global effort against vector-borne diseases like malaria.</p>","PeriodicalId":12593,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":"8 ","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11335745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.15433.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Resistance monitoring is a key element in controlling vector-borne diseases. The World Health Organization (WHO) and Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have each developed bottle bioassay methods for determining insecticide susceptibility in mosquito vectors which are used globally.

Methods: This study aimed to identify variations in bottle bioassay methodologies and assess the potential impact on the data that is generated. Our approach involved a systematic examination of existing literature and protocols from WHO and CDC, with a focus on the specifics of reported methodologies, variation between versions, and reported outcomes. Building on this, we experimentally evaluated the impact of several variables on bioassay results.

Results: Our literature review exposed a significant inconsistency in the how bioassay methods are reported, hindering reliable interpretation of data and the ability to compare results between studies. The experimental research provided further insight by specifically identifying two key factors that influence the outcomes of bioassays: mosquito dry weight and relative humidity (RH). This finding not only advances our comprehension of these assays but also underscores the importance of establishing precisely defined methodologies for resistance monitoring. The study also demonstrates the importance of controlling bioassay variables, noting the significant influence of wing length, as an indicator of mosquito size, on mortality rates in standardized bioassays.

Conclusions: Generating data with improved protocol consistency and precision will not only deepen our understanding of resistance patterns but also better inform vector control measures. We call for continued research and collaboration to refine and build consensus on bioassay techniques, to help bolster the global effort against vector-borne diseases like malaria.

打开包装WHO和CDC瓶生物测定方法:全面的文献回顾和方案分析揭示关键结果预测因子。
背景:耐药性监测是控制媒介传播疾病的关键因素。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)和疾病控制和预防中心(疾病控制和预防中心)各自开发了瓶子生物测定方法,用于确定全球使用的蚊子媒介的杀虫剂敏感性。方法:本研究旨在确定瓶子生物测定方法的变化,并评估对产生的数据的潜在影响。我们的方法包括对世卫组织和疾病预防控制中心的现有文献和方案进行系统检查,重点关注报告方法的细节、版本之间的差异和报告的结果。在此基础上,我们通过实验评估了几个变量对生物测定结果的影响。结果:我们的文献综述揭示了生物测定方法报告的显著不一致,阻碍了数据的可靠解释和比较研究结果的能力。实验研究通过明确确定影响生物测定结果的两个关键因素:蚊子干重和相对湿度(RH),提供了进一步的见解。这一发现不仅提高了我们对这些检测方法的理解,而且强调了建立精确定义的耐药性监测方法的重要性。该研究还证明了控制生物测定变量的重要性,指出在标准化生物测定中,作为蚊子大小指标的翼长对死亡率有重大影响。结论:提高方案一致性和准确性的数据生成不仅可以加深我们对耐药性模式的理解,还可以更好地为病媒控制措施提供信息。我们呼吁继续开展研究与合作,完善生物测定技术并建立共识,以帮助加强全球防治疟疾等病媒传播疾病的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gates Open Research
Gates Open Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信