Achieving Optimal Treatment Targets and Minimal Disease Activity with Upadacitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Integrated Analysis of Phase 3 Studies (Measure Up 1 and 2).
Jonathan I Silverberg, Melinda Gooderham, Norito Katoh, Valeria Aoki, Andrew E Pink, Yousef Binamer, Brad Glick, Petra Staubach, Brian Calimlim, Chao Li, Ayman Grada, Alvaro Moreira, Wan-Ju Lee, Andreas Wollenberg
{"title":"Achieving Optimal Treatment Targets and Minimal Disease Activity with Upadacitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Integrated Analysis of Phase 3 Studies (Measure Up 1 and 2).","authors":"Jonathan I Silverberg, Melinda Gooderham, Norito Katoh, Valeria Aoki, Andrew E Pink, Yousef Binamer, Brad Glick, Petra Staubach, Brian Calimlim, Chao Li, Ayman Grada, Alvaro Moreira, Wan-Ju Lee, Andreas Wollenberg","doi":"10.1007/s13555-025-01485-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Aiming High in Eczema/Atopic Dermatitis (AHEAD) guidelines recommend achieving minimal disease activity (MDA) in atopic dermatitis (AD), defined as simultaneous achievement of optimal treatment targets for at least one clinician- and one patient-reported outcome (ClinRO + PRO). We assessed the effect of upadacitinib on achieving optimal ClinROs, optimal PROs, and MDA in Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293) and Measure Up 2 (NCT3607422) studies for patients with moderate to severe AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive upadacitinib (15 mg or 30 mg) or placebo. Achievement of ≥ 1 optimal target in ClinROs, ≥ 1 optimal target in PROs, and MDA (≥ 1 optimal ClinROs and ≥ 1 optimal PROs) were reported at weeks 16 (upadacitinib vs placebo) and 52 (upadacitinib only). MDAs in selected combinations were also assessed at weeks 16 and 52. A total of 1683 and 1124 patients were included in the week 16 and 52 analysis, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 16, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib (15 mg: 42.5%, 30 mg: 55.9%) compared with placebo (6.4%) achieved MDA. At week 52, 57.4% and 69.9% of patients receiving 15 mg and 30 mg of upadacitinib achieved MDA, respectively. Specifically, patients receiving upadacitinib attained higher rates of ≥ 90% reduction from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 90) + Worst Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) 0/1 at week 16 (15 mg: 25.3%, 30 mg: 39.4% vs placebo: 1.8%) and maintained at week 52 (15 mg: 38.1%, 30 mg: 46.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with upadacitinib achieved both ClinRO and PRO optimal treatment targets as well as MDA and may optimize overall disease management in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11186,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-025-01485-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The Aiming High in Eczema/Atopic Dermatitis (AHEAD) guidelines recommend achieving minimal disease activity (MDA) in atopic dermatitis (AD), defined as simultaneous achievement of optimal treatment targets for at least one clinician- and one patient-reported outcome (ClinRO + PRO). We assessed the effect of upadacitinib on achieving optimal ClinROs, optimal PROs, and MDA in Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293) and Measure Up 2 (NCT3607422) studies for patients with moderate to severe AD.
Methods: Patients were randomized to receive upadacitinib (15 mg or 30 mg) or placebo. Achievement of ≥ 1 optimal target in ClinROs, ≥ 1 optimal target in PROs, and MDA (≥ 1 optimal ClinROs and ≥ 1 optimal PROs) were reported at weeks 16 (upadacitinib vs placebo) and 52 (upadacitinib only). MDAs in selected combinations were also assessed at weeks 16 and 52. A total of 1683 and 1124 patients were included in the week 16 and 52 analysis, respectively.
Results: At week 16, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib (15 mg: 42.5%, 30 mg: 55.9%) compared with placebo (6.4%) achieved MDA. At week 52, 57.4% and 69.9% of patients receiving 15 mg and 30 mg of upadacitinib achieved MDA, respectively. Specifically, patients receiving upadacitinib attained higher rates of ≥ 90% reduction from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 90) + Worst Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) 0/1 at week 16 (15 mg: 25.3%, 30 mg: 39.4% vs placebo: 1.8%) and maintained at week 52 (15 mg: 38.1%, 30 mg: 46.9%).
Conclusion: Treatment with upadacitinib achieved both ClinRO and PRO optimal treatment targets as well as MDA and may optimize overall disease management in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
期刊介绍:
Dermatology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance). The journal is dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of dermatological therapies. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health and epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
Areas of focus include, but are not limited to all clinical aspects of dermatology, such as skin pharmacology; skin development and aging; prevention, diagnosis, and management of skin disorders and melanomas; research into dermal structures and pathology; and all areas of aesthetic dermatology, including skin maintenance, dermatological surgery, and lasers.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/case series, trial protocols, and short communications. Dermatology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an International and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. The journal appeals to a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world.