Probiotic properties of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum KS2020 with GABA producing ability

IF 3.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Min-Jeong Kwon, Yun-Ho Park, Joo-Hyeong Kim, Jeong-Min Lee, Syng-Ook Lee, Sam-Pin Lee
{"title":"Probiotic properties of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum KS2020 with GABA producing ability","authors":"Min-Jeong Kwon,&nbsp;Yun-Ho Park,&nbsp;Joo-Hyeong Kim,&nbsp;Jeong-Min Lee,&nbsp;Syng-Ook Lee,&nbsp;Sam-Pin Lee","doi":"10.1007/s10068-025-01920-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The probiotic properties and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-producing ability of <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> KS2020, isolated from dongchimi, were evaluated. <i>Lb. plantarum</i> KS2020 exhibited no resistance to antibiotics such as ampicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, or chloramphenicol. It was also negative for hemolytic activity, cytotoxicity, and bile salt hydrolase activity, while producing negligible amounts of D-lactate, confirming its safety as a probiotic strain. The strain demonstrated strong tolerance to acid, gastric juice, and bile salts, thereby meeting the criteria for probiotics. In terms of GABA production, lactose was found to be the most effective sugar indicating 1.63% GABA production. However, GABA conversion did not occur in the absence of sugar or xylitol the strain could not utilize, highlighting the importance of carbon sources for GABA production. Therefore, <i>Lb. plantarum</i> KS2020 is confirmed as a safe probiotic with GABA-producing potential, suggesting its potential for developing novel probiotic-based functional foods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":566,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Biotechnology","volume":"34 12","pages":"2843 - 2853"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10068-025-01920-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The probiotic properties and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-producing ability of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum KS2020, isolated from dongchimi, were evaluated. Lb. plantarum KS2020 exhibited no resistance to antibiotics such as ampicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, or chloramphenicol. It was also negative for hemolytic activity, cytotoxicity, and bile salt hydrolase activity, while producing negligible amounts of D-lactate, confirming its safety as a probiotic strain. The strain demonstrated strong tolerance to acid, gastric juice, and bile salts, thereby meeting the criteria for probiotics. In terms of GABA production, lactose was found to be the most effective sugar indicating 1.63% GABA production. However, GABA conversion did not occur in the absence of sugar or xylitol the strain could not utilize, highlighting the importance of carbon sources for GABA production. Therefore, Lb. plantarum KS2020 is confirmed as a safe probiotic with GABA-producing potential, suggesting its potential for developing novel probiotic-based functional foods.

Abstract Image

具有产GABA能力的植物乳杆菌KS2020的益生菌特性
对东赤米植物乳杆菌KS2020的益生菌特性和产γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)能力进行了评价。Lb. plantarum KS2020对氨苄西林、红霉素、克林霉素、四环素或氯霉素等抗生素无耐药性。它的溶血活性、细胞毒性和胆盐水解酶活性也呈阴性,同时产生的d -乳酸可以忽略不计,这证实了它作为益生菌菌株的安全性。该菌株对酸、胃液和胆盐具有较强的耐受性,符合益生菌的标准。在产生GABA方面,发现乳糖是最有效的糖,产生1.63%的GABA。然而,在没有糖或木糖醇的情况下,GABA的转化不会发生,这突出了碳源对GABA生产的重要性。因此,植物Lb. plantarum KS2020被确认为具有gaba生产潜力的安全益生菌,表明其具有开发新型益生菌功能食品的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Science and Biotechnology
Food Science and Biotechnology FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The FSB journal covers food chemistry and analysis for compositional and physiological activity changes, food hygiene and toxicology, food microbiology and biotechnology, and food engineering involved in during and after food processing through physical, chemical, and biological ways. Consumer perception and sensory evaluation on processed foods are accepted only when they are relevant to the laboratory research work. As a general rule, manuscripts dealing with analysis and efficacy of extracts from natural resources prior to the processing or without any related food processing may not be considered within the scope of the journal. The FSB journal does not deal with only local interest and a lack of significant scientific merit. The main scope of our journal is seeking for human health and wellness through constructive works and new findings in food science and biotechnology field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信