Min Xiao, Tian Dou, Jia Ji, Caihua Zhu, Yuan Yuan, Hongmin Zhou, Fangqiong Li, Guang Li, Shuang Li
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Polaprezinc Granules Oral Administration in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions","authors":"Min Xiao, Tian Dou, Jia Ji, Caihua Zhu, Yuan Yuan, Hongmin Zhou, Fangqiong Li, Guang Li, Shuang Li","doi":"10.1111/cts.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study aimed to demonstrate bioequivalence between generic and original polaprezinc granules by comparing pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. This PK investigation was conducted with two independent, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, cross-over studies. Healthy Chinese fasting (<i>N</i> = 24, 75 mg) or fed (<i>N</i> = 24, 300 mg) subjects randomly received a single oral dose of the test or reference polaprezinc granules at each period. Blood samples were collected pre- and post-dose for up to 12 h. Blood zinc was determined using a validated ICP-MS method. Primary PK endpoints were calculated using non-compartmental methods, including peak concentration (<i>C</i><sub>max</sub>) and the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC<sub>0–t</sub>, AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>). The geometric mean ratios (GMR) in primary PK endpoints between the test and reference products with 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed. In the fasting study, <i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub> and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> were 1.30 ± 0.30 μg/mL, 4.06 ± 1.13 h·μg/mL, and 4.43 ± 1.04 h·μg/mL following 75 mg test product. In the fed study, <i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub> and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> were 0.91 ± 0.26 μg/mL, 3.26 ± 1.06 h·μg/mL, and 3.37 ± 1.07 h·μg/mL following 300 mg test product. The reference product had comparable PK profiles. All 90% CIs of GMRs in <i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub> and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> between the two products were within 80.0%–125.0%. Both study products were well-tolerated with no serious adverse events. The generic and original polaprezinc granules were bioequivalent by pharmacokinetic comparisons in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. The two polaprezinc formulations were well-tolerated with no new safety signals.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> CTR20210011</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70278","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study aimed to demonstrate bioequivalence between generic and original polaprezinc granules by comparing pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. This PK investigation was conducted with two independent, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, cross-over studies. Healthy Chinese fasting (N = 24, 75 mg) or fed (N = 24, 300 mg) subjects randomly received a single oral dose of the test or reference polaprezinc granules at each period. Blood samples were collected pre- and post-dose for up to 12 h. Blood zinc was determined using a validated ICP-MS method. Primary PK endpoints were calculated using non-compartmental methods, including peak concentration (Cmax) and the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0–t, AUC0–∞). The geometric mean ratios (GMR) in primary PK endpoints between the test and reference products with 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed. In the fasting study, Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were 1.30 ± 0.30 μg/mL, 4.06 ± 1.13 h·μg/mL, and 4.43 ± 1.04 h·μg/mL following 75 mg test product. In the fed study, Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were 0.91 ± 0.26 μg/mL, 3.26 ± 1.06 h·μg/mL, and 3.37 ± 1.07 h·μg/mL following 300 mg test product. The reference product had comparable PK profiles. All 90% CIs of GMRs in Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ between the two products were within 80.0%–125.0%. Both study products were well-tolerated with no serious adverse events. The generic and original polaprezinc granules were bioequivalent by pharmacokinetic comparisons in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. The two polaprezinc formulations were well-tolerated with no new safety signals.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.