Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Polaprezinc Granules Oral Administration in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Min Xiao, Tian Dou, Jia Ji, Caihua Zhu, Yuan Yuan, Hongmin Zhou, Fangqiong Li, Guang Li, Shuang Li
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Polaprezinc Granules Oral Administration in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions","authors":"Min Xiao,&nbsp;Tian Dou,&nbsp;Jia Ji,&nbsp;Caihua Zhu,&nbsp;Yuan Yuan,&nbsp;Hongmin Zhou,&nbsp;Fangqiong Li,&nbsp;Guang Li,&nbsp;Shuang Li","doi":"10.1111/cts.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study aimed to demonstrate bioequivalence between generic and original polaprezinc granules by comparing pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. This PK investigation was conducted with two independent, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, cross-over studies. Healthy Chinese fasting (<i>N</i> = 24, 75 mg) or fed (<i>N</i> = 24, 300 mg) subjects randomly received a single oral dose of the test or reference polaprezinc granules at each period. Blood samples were collected pre- and post-dose for up to 12 h. Blood zinc was determined using a validated ICP-MS method. Primary PK endpoints were calculated using non-compartmental methods, including peak concentration (<i>C</i><sub>max</sub>) and the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC<sub>0–t</sub>, AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>). The geometric mean ratios (GMR) in primary PK endpoints between the test and reference products with 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed. In the fasting study, <i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub> and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> were 1.30 ± 0.30 μg/mL, 4.06 ± 1.13 h·μg/mL, and 4.43 ± 1.04 h·μg/mL following 75 mg test product. In the fed study, <i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub> and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> were 0.91 ± 0.26 μg/mL, 3.26 ± 1.06 h·μg/mL, and 3.37 ± 1.07 h·μg/mL following 300 mg test product. The reference product had comparable PK profiles. All 90% CIs of GMRs in <i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub> and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> between the two products were within 80.0%–125.0%. Both study products were well-tolerated with no serious adverse events. The generic and original polaprezinc granules were bioequivalent by pharmacokinetic comparisons in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. The two polaprezinc formulations were well-tolerated with no new safety signals.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> CTR20210011</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70278","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to demonstrate bioequivalence between generic and original polaprezinc granules by comparing pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. This PK investigation was conducted with two independent, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, cross-over studies. Healthy Chinese fasting (N = 24, 75 mg) or fed (N = 24, 300 mg) subjects randomly received a single oral dose of the test or reference polaprezinc granules at each period. Blood samples were collected pre- and post-dose for up to 12 h. Blood zinc was determined using a validated ICP-MS method. Primary PK endpoints were calculated using non-compartmental methods, including peak concentration (Cmax) and the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0–t, AUC0–∞). The geometric mean ratios (GMR) in primary PK endpoints between the test and reference products with 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed. In the fasting study, Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were 1.30 ± 0.30 μg/mL, 4.06 ± 1.13 h·μg/mL, and 4.43 ± 1.04 h·μg/mL following 75 mg test product. In the fed study, Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were 0.91 ± 0.26 μg/mL, 3.26 ± 1.06 h·μg/mL, and 3.37 ± 1.07 h·μg/mL following 300 mg test product. The reference product had comparable PK profiles. All 90% CIs of GMRs in Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ between the two products were within 80.0%–125.0%. Both study products were well-tolerated with no serious adverse events. The generic and original polaprezinc granules were bioequivalent by pharmacokinetic comparisons in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. The two polaprezinc formulations were well-tolerated with no new safety signals.

Trial Registration: CTR20210011

Abstract Image

口服Polaprezinc颗粒剂在空腹和进食条件下的药代动力学和安全性
本研究旨在通过比较中国健康受试者在禁食和喂养条件下的药代动力学(PK)谱,证明仿制药和原厂药代锌颗粒的生物等效性。这项PK研究是通过两个独立、随机、开放标签、单剂量、两期、交叉研究进行的。健康的中国禁食(N = 24、75 mg)或喂养(N = 24、300 mg)受试者在每个时间段随机口服一剂试验用或参考用polaprezinc颗粒剂。在给药前和给药后12小时采集血样。血锌采用经验证的ICP-MS法测定。主要PK终点采用非室室法计算,包括峰浓度(Cmax)和血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0 -t, AUC0 -∞)。以90%的置信区间(CI)计算试验品和参比品主要PK终点的几何平均比(GMR)。评估治疗后出现的不良事件。空腹研究中,75 mg试验品后Cmax、AUC0 - t和AUC0 -∞分别为1.30±0.30 μg/mL、4.06±1.13 h·μg/mL和4.43±1.04 h·μg/mL。在喂饲试验中,300 mg试验品后Cmax、AUC0 - t和AUC0 -∞分别为0.91±0.26 μg/mL、3.26±1.06 h·μg/mL和3.37±1.07 h·μg/mL。参比产品具有可比的PK谱。两种产品间Cmax、AUC0 - t和AUC0 -∞GMRs的90% ci均在80.0% ~ 125.0%之间。两种研究产品耐受性良好,无严重不良事件。在中国健康受试者空腹和进食条件下,通过药代动力学比较,仿制药和原药polapre锌颗粒具有生物等效性。两种polaprezinc制剂耐受性良好,无新的安全信号。试验注册:CTR20210011
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信