Telehealth as a Care Solution for Homebound People: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Healthcare Utilization, Quality of Life, and Well-Being Outcomes

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza, Aarti Gulyani, Lemma N. Bulto, Regina Allande-Cussó, Vincent Pearson, Belinda Lange, Tania Marin, Lemlem Gebremichael, Shannon Brown, Hila Dafny, Shelda Sajeev, Norma Bulamu, Alline Beleigoli, Katie Nesbitt, Penelope McMillan, Robyn Clark, Matthew Tieu, Alison Kitson, Stephanie Champion, Sonia Hines, Jeroen M. Hendriks
{"title":"Telehealth as a Care Solution for Homebound People: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Healthcare Utilization, Quality of Life, and Well-Being Outcomes","authors":"Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza,&nbsp;Aarti Gulyani,&nbsp;Lemma N. Bulto,&nbsp;Regina Allande-Cussó,&nbsp;Vincent Pearson,&nbsp;Belinda Lange,&nbsp;Tania Marin,&nbsp;Lemlem Gebremichael,&nbsp;Shannon Brown,&nbsp;Hila Dafny,&nbsp;Shelda Sajeev,&nbsp;Norma Bulamu,&nbsp;Alline Beleigoli,&nbsp;Katie Nesbitt,&nbsp;Penelope McMillan,&nbsp;Robyn Clark,&nbsp;Matthew Tieu,&nbsp;Alison Kitson,&nbsp;Stephanie Champion,&nbsp;Sonia Hines,&nbsp;Jeroen M. Hendriks","doi":"10.1155/hsc/7224151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Homebound individuals residing in community settings with severe health conditions and disabilities could arguably benefit from telehealth interventions. However, the effectiveness of telehealth compared to in-person care remains underexplored, considering the diversity of these groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in reducing healthcare utilization and improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and well-being in homebound populations. Adhering and expanding on a published protocol, we conducted comprehensive search across multiple databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, LILACS, and the Web of Science, with no restrictions on language or publication date, and experimental and quasiexperimental studies considered. Eleven independent reviewers were responsible for study selection, and three for data extraction. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using JBI checklists. A meta-analysis was then performed using Stata software, which reported standardized mean differences (SMDs) as the effect measure, with the quality of evidence evaluated using the GRADE approach. From an initial screening of 3289 articles, ten studies met our inclusion criteria, with eight suitable for meta-analysis. These studies encompassed data from 2245 participants. Our findings revealed that telehealth interventions significantly reduced healthcare utilization (SMD: −0.49; 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.22; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, GRADE: low certainty), significantly enhanced HRQOL (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.35; <i>p</i> = 0.04, GRADE: moderate certainty), and significantly improved well-being (SMD: −0.31; 95% CI: −0.47 to −0.15; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, GRADE: moderate certainty) compared to in-person care. Thus, telehealth emerges as a viable alternative to conventional care, significantly reducing healthcare utilization and enhancing both HRQOL and well-being for homebound people. These findings underscore the potential of telehealth to mitigate healthcare disparities and emphasize the need for accessible, equitable telehealth services codeveloped with end users and relevant stakeholders to save resources and maximize health outcomes for vulnerable populations in community settings.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/7224151","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/7224151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Homebound individuals residing in community settings with severe health conditions and disabilities could arguably benefit from telehealth interventions. However, the effectiveness of telehealth compared to in-person care remains underexplored, considering the diversity of these groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in reducing healthcare utilization and improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and well-being in homebound populations. Adhering and expanding on a published protocol, we conducted comprehensive search across multiple databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, LILACS, and the Web of Science, with no restrictions on language or publication date, and experimental and quasiexperimental studies considered. Eleven independent reviewers were responsible for study selection, and three for data extraction. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using JBI checklists. A meta-analysis was then performed using Stata software, which reported standardized mean differences (SMDs) as the effect measure, with the quality of evidence evaluated using the GRADE approach. From an initial screening of 3289 articles, ten studies met our inclusion criteria, with eight suitable for meta-analysis. These studies encompassed data from 2245 participants. Our findings revealed that telehealth interventions significantly reduced healthcare utilization (SMD: −0.49; 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.22; p < 0.01, GRADE: low certainty), significantly enhanced HRQOL (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.35; p = 0.04, GRADE: moderate certainty), and significantly improved well-being (SMD: −0.31; 95% CI: −0.47 to −0.15; p < 0.01, GRADE: moderate certainty) compared to in-person care. Thus, telehealth emerges as a viable alternative to conventional care, significantly reducing healthcare utilization and enhancing both HRQOL and well-being for homebound people. These findings underscore the potential of telehealth to mitigate healthcare disparities and emphasize the need for accessible, equitable telehealth services codeveloped with end users and relevant stakeholders to save resources and maximize health outcomes for vulnerable populations in community settings.

Abstract Image

远程医疗作为居家人士的护理解决方案:医疗保健利用、生活质量和福祉结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析
居住在社区环境中有严重健康状况和残疾的居家个人可以说可以从远程保健干预措施中受益。然而,考虑到这些群体的多样性,与面对面护理相比,远程医疗的有效性仍未得到充分探讨。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估远程医疗在减少医疗保健利用和改善居家人群健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和福祉方面的有效性。遵循并扩展已发表的协议,我们在多个数据库中进行了全面的搜索:MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central), Scopus, LILACS和Web of Science,没有语言或出版日期的限制,并考虑了实验和准实验研究。11位独立审稿人负责研究选择,3位负责数据提取。采用JBI检查表评估纳入研究的方法学质量。然后使用Stata软件进行荟萃分析,该软件报告了标准化平均差异(SMDs)作为效果度量,并使用GRADE方法评估证据质量。从最初筛选的3289篇文章中,有10篇研究符合我们的纳入标准,其中8篇适合meta分析。这些研究包含了2245名参与者的数据。我们的研究结果表明,远程医疗干预显著降低了医疗保健利用率(SMD: - 0.49;95% CI:−0.76 ~−0.22;p & lt;0.01, GRADE:低确定性),显著提高HRQOL (SMD: 0.18;95% CI: 0.01 ~ 0.35;p = 0.04, GRADE:中度确定性),并显著改善了幸福感(SMD: - 0.31;95% CI:−0.47 ~−0.15;p & lt;0.01, GRADE:中度确定性)。因此,远程保健成为传统护理的一种可行替代方案,大大减少了医疗保健的利用,提高了居家人员的生活质量和福祉。这些调查结果强调了远程保健在减少保健差距方面的潜力,并强调需要与最终用户和相关利益攸关方共同开发可获得、公平的远程保健服务,以节省资源并最大限度地提高社区环境中弱势群体的健康成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信