David Santiago Ayala Alvarez, Peter G. F. Watson, Marija Popovic, Veng Jean Heng, Michael D. C. Evans, Valerie Panet-Raymond, Jan Seuntjens
{"title":"Evaluation of the TG-43 formalism for intraoperative radiotherapy dosimetry in glioblastoma treatment","authors":"David Santiago Ayala Alvarez, Peter G. F. Watson, Marija Popovic, Veng Jean Heng, Michael D. C. Evans, Valerie Panet-Raymond, Jan Seuntjens","doi":"10.1002/mp.17930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) using the INTRABEAM system has shown promise in glioblastoma treatment. However, accurate dosimetry remains challenging due to the low-energy photons used and the heterogeneity of tissues in the brain. Current clinical practice relies on the TARGIT method, but more robust approaches, including the TG-43 formalism and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, warrant investigation for potential improvements in dose calculation accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the TG-43 dosimetry formalism for IORT dose calculations in glioblastoma treatment using the INTRABEAM system, comparing it with the TARGIT method and MC simulations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed the dose distributions in 20 patients from the INTRAGO trial. The TG-43 formalism was validated against MC simulations in water (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>MC</mi>\n <mi>w</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm MC}_{\\rm w}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) using global/local dose differences and gamma analysis (1%/1mm). Organ at risk (OAR) doses were calculated using TG-43, TARGIT, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>MC</mi>\n <mi>w</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm MC}_{\\rm w}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, and MC in heterogeneous media (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>MC</mi>\n <mi>het</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm MC}_{\\rm het}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>). Combined IORT and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) doses were evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>TG-43 showed good agreement with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>MC</mi>\n <mi>w</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm MC}_{\\rm w}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, with a 98.0% gamma pass rate. The mean global dose difference was 0.07% <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$\\pm$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 0.29%, with TG-43 slightly overestimating dose compared to <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>MC</mi>\n <mi>w</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm MC}_{\\rm w}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. For OAR dose comparisons using TG-43 as reference, TARGIT underestimated doses by 0.1%–1.7%, while <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>MC</mi>\n <mi>het</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm MC}_{\\rm het}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> showed larger differences near bony structures (up to 1.9% <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$\\pm$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 1.4% for optic nerves). Combined IORT+EBRT analysis revealed more OAR constraint violations than identified by current clinical practice. Calculation times for TG-43 (0.6 s on average) were significantly shorter than for MC simulations (16–18 h on a computing cluster).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The TG-43 formalism provides a reasonable compromise between accuracy and computational efficiency for IORT dose calculations in glioblastoma treatment. It offers improved accuracy over TARGIT while being significantly faster and thus more feasible for intraoperative use than full MC simulations. Implementation of validated volumetric dose calculation methods like TG-43 has the potential to improve the accuracy of IORT treatment planning and OAR dose assessment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.17930","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17930","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) using the INTRABEAM system has shown promise in glioblastoma treatment. However, accurate dosimetry remains challenging due to the low-energy photons used and the heterogeneity of tissues in the brain. Current clinical practice relies on the TARGIT method, but more robust approaches, including the TG-43 formalism and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, warrant investigation for potential improvements in dose calculation accuracy.
Purpose
To evaluate the TG-43 dosimetry formalism for IORT dose calculations in glioblastoma treatment using the INTRABEAM system, comparing it with the TARGIT method and MC simulations.
Methods
We analyzed the dose distributions in 20 patients from the INTRAGO trial. The TG-43 formalism was validated against MC simulations in water () using global/local dose differences and gamma analysis (1%/1mm). Organ at risk (OAR) doses were calculated using TG-43, TARGIT, , and MC in heterogeneous media (). Combined IORT and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) doses were evaluated.
Results
TG-43 showed good agreement with , with a 98.0% gamma pass rate. The mean global dose difference was 0.07% 0.29%, with TG-43 slightly overestimating dose compared to . For OAR dose comparisons using TG-43 as reference, TARGIT underestimated doses by 0.1%–1.7%, while showed larger differences near bony structures (up to 1.9% 1.4% for optic nerves). Combined IORT+EBRT analysis revealed more OAR constraint violations than identified by current clinical practice. Calculation times for TG-43 (0.6 s on average) were significantly shorter than for MC simulations (16–18 h on a computing cluster).
Conclusions
The TG-43 formalism provides a reasonable compromise between accuracy and computational efficiency for IORT dose calculations in glioblastoma treatment. It offers improved accuracy over TARGIT while being significantly faster and thus more feasible for intraoperative use than full MC simulations. Implementation of validated volumetric dose calculation methods like TG-43 has the potential to improve the accuracy of IORT treatment planning and OAR dose assessment.
期刊介绍:
Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments
Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.