Acceptability and Feasibility of Using Educational Incentives for Research Participation to Advance Antiracism

Q2 Social Sciences
Barbara Green-Ajufo, Deepalika Chakravarty, Andres Maiorana, Marguerita Lightfoot, John Hamiga, Greg Rebchook
{"title":"Acceptability and Feasibility of Using Educational Incentives for Research Participation to Advance Antiracism","authors":"Barbara Green-Ajufo,&nbsp;Deepalika Chakravarty,&nbsp;Andres Maiorana,&nbsp;Marguerita Lightfoot,&nbsp;John Hamiga,&nbsp;Greg Rebchook","doi":"10.1002/eahr.60010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Nominal cash and gift card incentives provided to research participants have immediate financial benefits but make no lasting improvements to participants’ lives or social inequities they might experience. Our study examined the acceptability of offering a nonmonetary educational incentive as an added option to research participants as a potential to advance antiracism and address social inequities. Community members (n = 128) completed a quantitative survey; nine of whom also participated in a qualitative interview. Focus group discussions occurred with 11 researchers. Survey data were analyzed to obtain descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed using an iterative process guided by template analysis. Survey participants’ mean age was 45 years; 39% were white and 30% were Hispanic/Latinx; 80% were male; 39% had completed some college; 45% had a degree; and 71% reported previous paid participation in a research or community program. Of this group, 80% preferred cash or gift card incentives; 16% preferred an educational incentive; and 88% were likely to extremely likely to use educational incentives. Qualitative data indicated that educational incentives were acceptable but should not replace cash incentives; successful implementation would require organizational support. Noncash educational incentives may be acceptable to research participants and researchers and would help address social inequities. Successful implementation would require further research.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"47 4","pages":"18-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eahr.60010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.60010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nominal cash and gift card incentives provided to research participants have immediate financial benefits but make no lasting improvements to participants’ lives or social inequities they might experience. Our study examined the acceptability of offering a nonmonetary educational incentive as an added option to research participants as a potential to advance antiracism and address social inequities. Community members (n = 128) completed a quantitative survey; nine of whom also participated in a qualitative interview. Focus group discussions occurred with 11 researchers. Survey data were analyzed to obtain descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed using an iterative process guided by template analysis. Survey participants’ mean age was 45 years; 39% were white and 30% were Hispanic/Latinx; 80% were male; 39% had completed some college; 45% had a degree; and 71% reported previous paid participation in a research or community program. Of this group, 80% preferred cash or gift card incentives; 16% preferred an educational incentive; and 88% were likely to extremely likely to use educational incentives. Qualitative data indicated that educational incentives were acceptable but should not replace cash incentives; successful implementation would require organizational support. Noncash educational incentives may be acceptable to research participants and researchers and would help address social inequities. Successful implementation would require further research.

利用教育激励参与研究促进反种族主义的可接受性和可行性
提供给研究参与者名义上的现金和礼品卡奖励会带来直接的经济利益,但对参与者的生活或他们可能经历的社会不平等没有持久的改善。我们的研究考察了提供非货币性教育激励作为研究参与者的额外选择的可接受性,作为推进反种族主义和解决社会不平等问题的潜力。社区成员(n = 128)完成定量调查;其中9人还参加了定性访谈。与11名研究人员进行了焦点小组讨论。对调查数据进行分析,得到描述性统计数据。采用模板分析指导的迭代过程对定性数据进行分析。调查参与者的平均年龄为45岁;39%为白人,30%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔;80%为男性;39%的人完成了大学学业;45%的人拥有学位;71%的人表示,他们之前曾付费参与过研究或社区项目。在这一群体中,80%的人更喜欢现金或礼品卡奖励;16%的人更喜欢教育奖励;88%的人极有可能使用教育激励措施。定性数据表明,教育奖励是可以接受的,但不应取代现金奖励;成功的实施需要组织的支持。非现金教育激励可能被研究参与者和研究人员所接受,并有助于解决社会不平等问题。成功的实施需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信