Artificial Intelligence Solutions to Improve Emergency Department Wait Times: Living Systematic Review

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Bahareh Ahmadzadeh MSc , Christopher Patey MD , Paul Norman BN , Alison Farrell MLIS , John Knight PhD , Stephen Czarnuch PhD , Shabnam Asghari MD, PhD
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Solutions to Improve Emergency Department Wait Times: Living Systematic Review","authors":"Bahareh Ahmadzadeh MSc ,&nbsp;Christopher Patey MD ,&nbsp;Paul Norman BN ,&nbsp;Alison Farrell MLIS ,&nbsp;John Knight PhD ,&nbsp;Stephen Czarnuch PhD ,&nbsp;Shabnam Asghari MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.05.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Overcrowding and long wait times in emergency departments (EDs) remain global challenges that negatively affect patient outcomes and staff satisfaction. As an emerging technology, artificial intelligence (AI) offers the potential to optimize ED operations and reduce wait times.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Establish a strategy to evaluate AI modeling as it relates to utilizing AI based strategies for ED flow.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus for English-language studies published from January 1, 1946, to August 17, 2023, and we will update our search to ensure currency. The ROBINS-I tool assessed study quality, while PROBAST examined the risk of bias and applicability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 17,569 screened studies, 65 full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility, with 16 quantitative observational studies meeting inclusion criteria. The best-performing algorithms included regression-based methods (n = 2), traditional single-model machine learning (n = 8), neural networks/deep learning (n = 3), natural language processing (n = 1), and ensemble methods (n = 2). None of the studies examined AI’s impact in a real ED setting, though four simulations reported wait-time reductions ranging from 7 to 43.2 minutes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI integration in ED is still in its infancy. Our review found no real-world ED implementation studies, and most of the existing research lacked involvement from ED experts. This gap highlights the lack of insight into AI’s practical impact. Future reviews and research must clarify these dimensions, guiding AI's effective, collaborative adoption in ED workflows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Pages 174-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925002318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Overcrowding and long wait times in emergency departments (EDs) remain global challenges that negatively affect patient outcomes and staff satisfaction. As an emerging technology, artificial intelligence (AI) offers the potential to optimize ED operations and reduce wait times.

Objective

Establish a strategy to evaluate AI modeling as it relates to utilizing AI based strategies for ED flow.

Methods

We searched Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus for English-language studies published from January 1, 1946, to August 17, 2023, and we will update our search to ensure currency. The ROBINS-I tool assessed study quality, while PROBAST examined the risk of bias and applicability.

Results

Out of 17,569 screened studies, 65 full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility, with 16 quantitative observational studies meeting inclusion criteria. The best-performing algorithms included regression-based methods (n = 2), traditional single-model machine learning (n = 8), neural networks/deep learning (n = 3), natural language processing (n = 1), and ensemble methods (n = 2). None of the studies examined AI’s impact in a real ED setting, though four simulations reported wait-time reductions ranging from 7 to 43.2 minutes.

Conclusions

AI integration in ED is still in its infancy. Our review found no real-world ED implementation studies, and most of the existing research lacked involvement from ED experts. This gap highlights the lack of insight into AI’s practical impact. Future reviews and research must clarify these dimensions, guiding AI's effective, collaborative adoption in ED workflows.
改善急诊科等待时间的人工智能解决方案:生活系统回顾
急诊科过度拥挤和等待时间过长仍然是全球面临的挑战,对患者治疗结果和工作人员满意度产生负面影响。作为一项新兴技术,人工智能(AI)为优化ED操作和减少等待时间提供了潜力。目的建立一种策略来评估人工智能建模,因为它涉及到在ED流中使用基于人工智能的策略。方法我们检索Embase、MEDLINE、CINAHL和Scopus检索1946年1月1日至2023年8月17日发表的英语研究,我们将更新我们的检索以确保准确性。ROBINS-I工具评估研究质量,PROBAST检查偏倚风险和适用性。结果在17,569项筛选的研究中,65篇全文文章被评估为合格,其中16项定量观察性研究符合纳入标准。表现最好的算法包括基于回归的方法(n = 2)、传统的单模型机器学习(n = 8)、神经网络/深度学习(n = 3)、自然语言处理(n = 1)和集成方法(n = 2)。没有一项研究考察了人工智能对真实急诊科环境的影响,尽管有四项模拟报告称,等待时间减少了7到43.2分钟。结论人工智能在ED中的应用尚处于起步阶段。我们的综述没有发现现实世界的ED实施研究,而且大多数现有的研究缺乏ED专家的参与。这一差距凸显了对人工智能实际影响缺乏洞察力。未来的评论和研究必须澄清这些维度,指导人工智能在ED工作流程中的有效协作采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信