The role of simulation in knowledge dissemination and improving clinical outcomes for the management of impacted fetal head at cesarean delivery.

Christopher M Nash, Elizabeth Randle, Allyson Cruickshank, Jocelyn Stairs
{"title":"The role of simulation in knowledge dissemination and improving clinical outcomes for the management of impacted fetal head at cesarean delivery.","authors":"Christopher M Nash, Elizabeth Randle, Allyson Cruickshank, Jocelyn Stairs","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Impacted fetal head (IFH) is an obstetrical emergency with associated maternal and fetal morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the role for a simulation session about the management of IFH at cesarean delivery as a method of disseminating guideline recommendations to obstetricians. The secondary aim was to assess the clinical impact of this initiative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IFH simulation session based on recent guidelines was developed using the PROMPT FLEX enhanced cesarean section model to review pull, push, and Patwardhan techniques. All faculty and obstetrical trainees were invited to participate. Participants completed baseline and post-session surveys. Survey scores were compared using paired t-test and ANOVA. To assess clinical impact, a 6 month pre/post cohort of all patients who underwent second stage cesarean delivery was assembled. Multivariable robust Poisson regression models were used to estimate relative risk of a composite maternal/neonatal morbidity outcome pre/post implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34 clinicians participated (21 trainee,13 faculty). Trainees demonstrated significant, sustained improvement in knowledge following participation (P < 0.001). Trainees reported sustained comfort level with push and pull techniques but comfort with Patwardhan waned (P = 0.03). Faculty comfort was unchanged for push and pull techniques but significantly improved for Patwardhan (P = 0.01). The adjusted relative risk of composite maternal/neonatal morbidity following implementation was unchanged (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.75-1.42). However, NICU admissions were reduced (P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An IFH simulation session was associated with improvement in trainee knowledge and faculty and trainee comfort with the Patwardhan technique. Simulation may be an effective tool to improve obstetrician comfort with novel recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","volume":" ","pages":"103037"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Impacted fetal head (IFH) is an obstetrical emergency with associated maternal and fetal morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the role for a simulation session about the management of IFH at cesarean delivery as a method of disseminating guideline recommendations to obstetricians. The secondary aim was to assess the clinical impact of this initiative.

Methods: An IFH simulation session based on recent guidelines was developed using the PROMPT FLEX enhanced cesarean section model to review pull, push, and Patwardhan techniques. All faculty and obstetrical trainees were invited to participate. Participants completed baseline and post-session surveys. Survey scores were compared using paired t-test and ANOVA. To assess clinical impact, a 6 month pre/post cohort of all patients who underwent second stage cesarean delivery was assembled. Multivariable robust Poisson regression models were used to estimate relative risk of a composite maternal/neonatal morbidity outcome pre/post implementation.

Results: 34 clinicians participated (21 trainee,13 faculty). Trainees demonstrated significant, sustained improvement in knowledge following participation (P < 0.001). Trainees reported sustained comfort level with push and pull techniques but comfort with Patwardhan waned (P = 0.03). Faculty comfort was unchanged for push and pull techniques but significantly improved for Patwardhan (P = 0.01). The adjusted relative risk of composite maternal/neonatal morbidity following implementation was unchanged (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.75-1.42). However, NICU admissions were reduced (P = 0.01).

Conclusion: An IFH simulation session was associated with improvement in trainee knowledge and faculty and trainee comfort with the Patwardhan technique. Simulation may be an effective tool to improve obstetrician comfort with novel recommendations.

模拟在知识传播和改善剖宫产阻生胎头处理临床结果中的作用。
目的:阻生胎头(IFH)是一种与母体和胎儿相关的产科急诊。本研究的目的是评估剖宫产中IFH管理的模拟会议作为向产科医生传播指南建议的方法的作用。第二个目的是评估这一举措的临床影响。方法:基于最新指南的IFH模拟会话使用PROMPT FLEX增强剖宫产模型来回顾拉、推和Patwardhan技术。所有的教师和产科实习生都被邀请参加。参与者完成了基线和会后调查。调查得分比较采用配对t检验和方差分析。为了评估临床影响,对所有接受第二阶段剖宫产的患者进行了为期6个月的前后队列研究。使用多变量稳健泊松回归模型来估计实施前后孕产妇/新生儿复合发病率结局的相对风险。结果:34名临床医生参与其中(实习21人,教师13人)。学员在参与后表现出显著的、持续的知识改善(P < 0.001)。学员报告推拉技术的持续舒适水平,但帕特瓦丹技术的舒适度下降(P = 0.03)。推拉技术的教师舒适度没有变化,但Patwardhan显著改善(P = 0.01)。实施后调整后的孕产妇/新生儿复合发病率相对风险没有变化(RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.75-1.42)。新生儿重症监护病房入院率降低(P = 0.01)。结论:IFH模拟课程与受训人员的知识和能力的提高以及受训人员对Patwardhan技术的适应程度有关。模拟可能是提高产科医生舒适度的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信