Provider perspectives on Intrauterine device practices in adolescent patients.

Amber Sucharov, Kristina Arion, Sarah McQuillan
{"title":"Provider perspectives on Intrauterine device practices in adolescent patients.","authors":"Amber Sucharov, Kristina Arion, Sarah McQuillan","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adolescent pregnancy is a worldwide public health concern, and the intrauterine device (IUD) is known to be a safe and effective method of long-acting reversible contraception in this group. Pediatric and gynecologic societies have recommended the IUD as a first line contraceptive for adolescents given their safety and efficacy. This study aims to understand current IUD practices, elucidate barriers to insertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was disseminated to NASPAG (North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecologists) members via the listserv on two separate occasions. Consent was obtained prior to initiation of the survey. Results from the survey are anonymous. Results were tabulated with descriptive statistics. Ethics approval was obtained (REB22-0269).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 55 respondents, mostly in North America (93%). As per providers, adolescents most frequently seek out the IUD for contraception (45%) and abnormal uterine bleeding (24%). Providers felt the most common barrier was misconceptions (25%), and pain with insertion (24%). Although many physicians perform office insertions, many found that a Procedural Sedation Center optimized wait times (38%) or felt that such a center would be helpful (33%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that misconceptions surrounding the IUD remain. Education on contraception, specifically LARCs, is pivotal in decreasing adolescent pregnancy, reducing barriers, and improving the attitude of adolescents toward the IUD. Pain with insertion is a limiting factor and procedural sedation may help in managing expectations and increasing acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":520287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","volume":" ","pages":"103031"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Adolescent pregnancy is a worldwide public health concern, and the intrauterine device (IUD) is known to be a safe and effective method of long-acting reversible contraception in this group. Pediatric and gynecologic societies have recommended the IUD as a first line contraceptive for adolescents given their safety and efficacy. This study aims to understand current IUD practices, elucidate barriers to insertion.

Methods: A survey was disseminated to NASPAG (North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecologists) members via the listserv on two separate occasions. Consent was obtained prior to initiation of the survey. Results from the survey are anonymous. Results were tabulated with descriptive statistics. Ethics approval was obtained (REB22-0269).

Results: There were 55 respondents, mostly in North America (93%). As per providers, adolescents most frequently seek out the IUD for contraception (45%) and abnormal uterine bleeding (24%). Providers felt the most common barrier was misconceptions (25%), and pain with insertion (24%). Although many physicians perform office insertions, many found that a Procedural Sedation Center optimized wait times (38%) or felt that such a center would be helpful (33%).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that misconceptions surrounding the IUD remain. Education on contraception, specifically LARCs, is pivotal in decreasing adolescent pregnancy, reducing barriers, and improving the attitude of adolescents toward the IUD. Pain with insertion is a limiting factor and procedural sedation may help in managing expectations and increasing acceptance.

提供者对青少年患者宫内节育器实践的看法。
目的:青少年怀孕是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,而宫内节育器(IUD)被认为是这一群体安全有效的长效可逆避孕方法。鉴于其安全性和有效性,儿科和妇科协会建议将宫内节育器作为青少年的一线避孕措施。本研究旨在了解目前的宫内节育器的做法,阐明插入的障碍。方法:在两个不同的场合通过列表服务向NASPAG(北美儿科和青少年妇科医师协会)成员分发调查问卷。调查开始前已取得同意。调查结果是匿名的。结果用描述性统计数据制成表格。获得伦理批准(REB22-0269)。结果:共有55名受访者,大部分来自北美(93%)。根据提供者的数据,青少年最常寻求使用宫内节育器避孕(45%)和子宫异常出血(24%)。提供者认为最常见的障碍是误解(25%)和插入疼痛(24%)。尽管许多医生执行办公室插入,但许多医生发现程序镇静中心优化了等待时间(38%)或认为这样的中心会有所帮助(33%)。结论:本研究表明围绕宫内节育器的误解仍然存在。避孕教育,特别是LARCs,对于减少青少年怀孕、减少障碍和改善青少年对宫内节育器的态度至关重要。插入时的疼痛是一个限制因素,程序性镇静可能有助于控制预期和增加接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信