[Peri-implant shaft fractures of the femur and tibia : Classification, diagnostics, treatment and geriatric trauma aspects].

Christopher Lampert, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Wolfgang Böcker, Maximilian Lerchenberger
{"title":"[Peri-implant shaft fractures of the femur and tibia : Classification, diagnostics, treatment and geriatric trauma aspects].","authors":"Christopher Lampert, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Wolfgang Böcker, Maximilian Lerchenberger","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01606-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peri-implant fractures of the femur and tibia shaft represent an increasing challenge in the clinical routine due to rising incidence, an aging and multimorbid patient population and often unfavorable postoperative outcomes. This article provides an overview of classification systems, diagnostic approaches and therapeutic strategies, with particular emphasis on aspects relevant to geriatric trauma care. The Vancouver, Lewis-Rorabeck, and Felix classifications form the basis for making treatment decisions in periprosthetic fractures of the femur and tibia. The management is primarily guided by the fracture location, implant stability, and bone quality. In cases of stable implants, locking plate osteosynthesis or intramedullary nailing is commonly used. When prosthetic loosening is present (e.g., Vancouver B2/B3 or Lewis-Rorabeck type III classification), revision arthroplasty is generally required. Interprosthetic fractures represent a distinct biomechanical challenge due to the presence of the implant and necessitate lengthy, locking bridging constructs or, in selected cases, the use of a megaprosthesis. In the context of geriatric trauma care, early mobilization that enables immediate full weight-bearing and interdisciplinary treatment within a certified geriatric trauma center are essential to reduce morbidity, mortality and the level of long-term care needed. Furthermore, the use of cemented stems can reduce the risk of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. These aspects should be incorporated into the management of geriatric trauma patients to contribute to an improvement in long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-025-01606-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peri-implant fractures of the femur and tibia shaft represent an increasing challenge in the clinical routine due to rising incidence, an aging and multimorbid patient population and often unfavorable postoperative outcomes. This article provides an overview of classification systems, diagnostic approaches and therapeutic strategies, with particular emphasis on aspects relevant to geriatric trauma care. The Vancouver, Lewis-Rorabeck, and Felix classifications form the basis for making treatment decisions in periprosthetic fractures of the femur and tibia. The management is primarily guided by the fracture location, implant stability, and bone quality. In cases of stable implants, locking plate osteosynthesis or intramedullary nailing is commonly used. When prosthetic loosening is present (e.g., Vancouver B2/B3 or Lewis-Rorabeck type III classification), revision arthroplasty is generally required. Interprosthetic fractures represent a distinct biomechanical challenge due to the presence of the implant and necessitate lengthy, locking bridging constructs or, in selected cases, the use of a megaprosthesis. In the context of geriatric trauma care, early mobilization that enables immediate full weight-bearing and interdisciplinary treatment within a certified geriatric trauma center are essential to reduce morbidity, mortality and the level of long-term care needed. Furthermore, the use of cemented stems can reduce the risk of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. These aspects should be incorporated into the management of geriatric trauma patients to contribute to an improvement in long-term outcomes.

[股骨和胫骨种植体周围干骨折:分类、诊断、治疗和老年创伤方面]。
股骨和胫骨干种植体周围骨折由于发病率的上升、患者的老龄化和多病性以及通常不利的术后结果,在临床常规中呈现出越来越大的挑战。本文概述了分类系统、诊断方法和治疗策略,特别强调了与老年创伤护理相关的方面。Vancouver、Lewis-Rorabeck和Felix分类构成了股骨和胫骨假体周围骨折治疗决策的基础。治疗主要根据骨折位置、种植体稳定性和骨质量来指导。在稳定植入物的情况下,通常使用锁定钢板固定或髓内钉。当假体出现松动时(例如,Vancouver B2/B3或Lewis-Rorabeck III型分类),通常需要翻修关节置换术。由于假体的存在,假体间骨折是一种独特的生物力学挑战,需要长时间的锁定桥接结构,或者在某些情况下使用大型假体。在老年创伤护理的背景下,早期动员能够在经过认证的老年创伤中心内立即进行全面负重和跨学科治疗,对于降低发病率、死亡率和所需的长期护理水平至关重要。此外,使用骨水泥柄可以降低假体周围股骨近端骨折的风险。这些方面应纳入老年创伤患者的管理有助于改善长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信