Comparison of the accuracy of different slot properties of 3D-printed cutting guides for raising free fibular flaps using saw or piezoelectric instruments: an in vitro study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Britta Maria Lohn, Stefan Raith, Mark Ooms, Philipp Winnand, Frank Hölzle, Ali Modabber
{"title":"Comparison of the accuracy of different slot properties of 3D-printed cutting guides for raising free fibular flaps using saw or piezoelectric instruments: an in vitro study.","authors":"Britta Maria Lohn, Stefan Raith, Mark Ooms, Philipp Winnand, Frank Hölzle, Ali Modabber","doi":"10.1007/s11548-025-03474-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The free fibular flap (FFF) is a standard procedure for the oral rehabilitation of segmental bone defects in the mandible caused by diseases such as malignant processes, osteonecrosis, or trauma. Digital guides and computer-assisted surgery (CAS) can improve precision and reduce the time and cost of surgery. This study evaluates how different designs of slot cutting guides, guiding heights, and cutting instruments affect surgical accuracy during mandibular reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety model operations in a three-part fibular transplant for mandibular reconstruction were conducted according to digital planning with three guide designs (standard, flange, and anatomical slots), three guide heights (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm), and two osteotomy instruments (piezoelectric instrument and saw). The cut segments were digitized using computed tomography and digitally evaluated to assess surgical accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For vestibular and lingual segment length, the anatomical slot and the flange appear to be the most accurate, with the flange slightly under-contoured vestibularly and the standard slot over-contoured lingually and vestibularly (p < 0.001). There were only minor differences between the use of saw and piezoelectric instrument for lingual (p = 0.005) and vestibular (p < 0.001) length and proximal angle (p = 0.014). The U-distance after global reconstruction for flanges resulted in a median deviation of 0.0468 mm (IQR 8.15), but was not significant (p = 0.067).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anatomical slots and flanges are recommended for osteotomy, with guiding effects relying on both haptic and visual control. Unilateral guided flanges also work accurately at high guidance heights. The results of piezoelectric instrument (PI) and saw showed comparable results in the assessment of individual segments and U-reconstruction in this in vitro study without soft tissue, so that the final decision is left to the expertise of the surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03474-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The free fibular flap (FFF) is a standard procedure for the oral rehabilitation of segmental bone defects in the mandible caused by diseases such as malignant processes, osteonecrosis, or trauma. Digital guides and computer-assisted surgery (CAS) can improve precision and reduce the time and cost of surgery. This study evaluates how different designs of slot cutting guides, guiding heights, and cutting instruments affect surgical accuracy during mandibular reconstruction.

Methods: Ninety model operations in a three-part fibular transplant for mandibular reconstruction were conducted according to digital planning with three guide designs (standard, flange, and anatomical slots), three guide heights (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm), and two osteotomy instruments (piezoelectric instrument and saw). The cut segments were digitized using computed tomography and digitally evaluated to assess surgical accuracy.

Results: For vestibular and lingual segment length, the anatomical slot and the flange appear to be the most accurate, with the flange slightly under-contoured vestibularly and the standard slot over-contoured lingually and vestibularly (p < 0.001). There were only minor differences between the use of saw and piezoelectric instrument for lingual (p = 0.005) and vestibular (p < 0.001) length and proximal angle (p = 0.014). The U-distance after global reconstruction for flanges resulted in a median deviation of 0.0468 mm (IQR 8.15), but was not significant (p = 0.067).

Conclusion: Anatomical slots and flanges are recommended for osteotomy, with guiding effects relying on both haptic and visual control. Unilateral guided flanges also work accurately at high guidance heights. The results of piezoelectric instrument (PI) and saw showed comparable results in the assessment of individual segments and U-reconstruction in this in vitro study without soft tissue, so that the final decision is left to the expertise of the surgeons.

使用锯或压电仪器提高自由腓骨皮瓣的3d打印切割导轨的不同槽属性的准确性比较:一项体外研究。
目的:游离腓骨瓣(FFF)是修复下颌骨因恶性病变、骨坏死或创伤等疾病引起的节段性骨缺损的一种标准方法。数字导板和计算机辅助手术(CAS)可以提高手术精度,减少手术时间和成本。本研究评估不同设计的切口导向、导向高度和切割器械对下颌骨重建手术精度的影响。方法:采用三种导骨设计(标准、凸缘、解剖槽)、三种导骨高度(1mm、2mm、3mm)、两种截骨器械(压电仪、锯),按照数字规划进行下颌三段式腓骨移植重建模型手术90例。使用计算机断层扫描对切割段进行数字化处理,并对其进行数字化评估,以评估手术的准确性。结果:对于前庭和舌段长度,解剖槽和凸缘最准确,凸缘略低于前庭轮廓,标准槽略高于前庭轮廓。(p)结论:推荐解剖槽和凸缘进行截骨,并依靠触觉和视觉控制发挥引导作用。单边导向法兰在高导向高度下也能准确工作。在这项无软组织的体外研究中,压电仪(PI)和锯的结果在评估单个节段和u重建方面显示出相当的结果,因此最终的决定留给外科医生的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信