Combining ALL with ACL Reconstruction Improves Kinesiophobia and Pivot Shift Reducing Reoperation Rate When Stable Lateral Meniscal Tears Are Left In Situ.

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jacopo Conteduca, Damiano Longo, Alessandro Carrozzo, Igor Rausa, Giorgio Giannini, Giuseppe Rollo
{"title":"Combining ALL with ACL Reconstruction Improves Kinesiophobia and Pivot Shift Reducing Reoperation Rate When Stable Lateral Meniscal Tears Are Left In Situ.","authors":"Jacopo Conteduca, Damiano Longo, Alessandro Carrozzo, Igor Rausa, Giorgio Giannini, Giuseppe Rollo","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>Graft failure and secondary meniscal tears remain significant concerns following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs), including anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction, have demonstrated efficacy in reducing ACL graft failure and meniscal repair rates. However, their impact on untreated stable meniscal tears remains unclear. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and reoperation rates between ACLR with and without ALL reconstruction in patients with untreated stable lateral meniscal tears.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on patients who underwent primary ACLR with autograft hamstring tendon (HT) alone or HT combined with ALL reconstruction (HT + ALL) between January 2019 and December 2022. All included patients had a concomitant stable, not displaced or moving lateral meniscal tear left in situ. Clinical evaluation was conducted preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of two years, utilizing the Lachman test, pivot shift test, Rolimeter measurements, Objective and subjective IKDC, Lysholm score, and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11). Reoperation rates and postoperative complications were also recorded. A post-hoc power analysis was conducted based on the results of the independent samples t-test comparing kinesiophobia scores between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four patients (average age at time of surgery: 28 years) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (range: 2-5.5 years follow-up) were included: 31 in the HT group and 33 in the HT + ALL group. Graft rupture rates were 9.6% in the HT group and 3.3% in the HT + ALL group (not statistically significant difference). Secondary meniscal surgeries were required in 12.9% of HT patients compared to 0% in the HT + ALL group (p < 0.05). The HT + ALL group demonstrated lower reoperation rates at final follow-up (97% vs. 77.5%; p < 0.05). Functional scores showed no statistically significant differences except for improved TSK-11 scores (P<0.01) and pivot shift test (P<0.025) outcomes favoring the HT + ALL group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with stable lateral meniscal tears left in situ, adding ALL reconstruction to ACLR with autografts may reduce the risk of secondary meniscal surgery and graft failure, with comparable or improved functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objectives: Graft failure and secondary meniscal tears remain significant concerns following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs), including anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction, have demonstrated efficacy in reducing ACL graft failure and meniscal repair rates. However, their impact on untreated stable meniscal tears remains unclear. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and reoperation rates between ACLR with and without ALL reconstruction in patients with untreated stable lateral meniscal tears.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on patients who underwent primary ACLR with autograft hamstring tendon (HT) alone or HT combined with ALL reconstruction (HT + ALL) between January 2019 and December 2022. All included patients had a concomitant stable, not displaced or moving lateral meniscal tear left in situ. Clinical evaluation was conducted preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of two years, utilizing the Lachman test, pivot shift test, Rolimeter measurements, Objective and subjective IKDC, Lysholm score, and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11). Reoperation rates and postoperative complications were also recorded. A post-hoc power analysis was conducted based on the results of the independent samples t-test comparing kinesiophobia scores between the two groups.

Results: Sixty-four patients (average age at time of surgery: 28 years) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (range: 2-5.5 years follow-up) were included: 31 in the HT group and 33 in the HT + ALL group. Graft rupture rates were 9.6% in the HT group and 3.3% in the HT + ALL group (not statistically significant difference). Secondary meniscal surgeries were required in 12.9% of HT patients compared to 0% in the HT + ALL group (p < 0.05). The HT + ALL group demonstrated lower reoperation rates at final follow-up (97% vs. 77.5%; p < 0.05). Functional scores showed no statistically significant differences except for improved TSK-11 scores (P<0.01) and pivot shift test (P<0.025) outcomes favoring the HT + ALL group.

Conclusions: In patients with stable lateral meniscal tears left in situ, adding ALL reconstruction to ACLR with autografts may reduce the risk of secondary meniscal surgery and graft failure, with comparable or improved functional outcomes.

Level of evidence: 3, retrospective comparative study.

ALL联合前交叉韧带重建改善了运动恐惧症和枢轴移位,减少了稳定外侧半月板撕裂原位时的再手术率。
前言/目的:移植失败和继发性半月板撕裂仍然是前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后的重要问题。外侧关节外手术(LEAPs),包括前外侧韧带(ALL)重建,已被证明在减少ACL移植失败和半月板修复率方面有效。然而,它们对未经治疗的稳定半月板撕裂的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较未经治疗的稳定性外侧半月板撕裂患者的ACLR合并和不合并ALL重建的临床结果和再手术率。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2022年12月期间接受自体腘绳肌腱移植(HT)或HT联合ALL重建(HT + ALL)的原发性ACLR患者的前瞻性数据。所有纳入的患者均伴有稳定、不移位或不移动的外侧半月板原位撕裂。术前和至少随访两年进行临床评估,采用Lachman试验、枢轴移位试验、Rolimeter测量、客观和主观IKDC、Lysholm评分和坦帕运动恐惧症量表(TSK-11)。记录再手术率及术后并发症。根据独立样本t检验比较两组间运动恐惧症得分的结果进行事后功效分析。结果:64例患者(手术时平均年龄:28岁),最小随访2年(随访范围:2-5.5年):HT组31例,HT + ALL组33例。移植瘤破裂率HT组为9.6%,HT + ALL组为3.3%(差异无统计学意义)。12.9%的HT患者需要进行二次半月板手术,而HT + ALL组为0% (p < 0.05)。HT + ALL组在最后随访时的再手术率较低(97% vs. 77.5%;P < 0.05)。除TSK-11评分改善外,功能评分无统计学差异(p)。结论:在原位留下稳定外侧半月板撕裂的患者中,在ACLR中加入ALL重建和自体移植物可降低继发性半月板手术和移植物失败的风险,功能结果相当或改善。证据等级:3,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信