Catalina de Paco Matallana, Jose E Blanco-Carnero, Ana Company Calabuig, Manuela Fernandez, Monika Lewanczyk, Matilda Burton, Xi Yang, Alice L Mitchell, Anita Lovgren-Sandblom, Hanns-Ulrich Marschall, David Wright, Caroline Ovadia, Kypros Nicolaides, Catherine Williamson
{"title":"Randomized, controlled trial of the impact of ursodeoxycholic acid on glycemia in gestational diabetes mellitus: the GUARDS trial.","authors":"Catalina de Paco Matallana, Jose E Blanco-Carnero, Ana Company Calabuig, Manuela Fernandez, Monika Lewanczyk, Matilda Burton, Xi Yang, Alice L Mitchell, Anita Lovgren-Sandblom, Hanns-Ulrich Marschall, David Wright, Caroline Ovadia, Kypros Nicolaides, Catherine Williamson","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a pregnancy complication that can be associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Optimal glycemic control remains challenging for many patients despite existing management strategies. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is commonly used for cholestasis in pregnancy and has shown potential metabolic benefits, including improved insulin sensitivity and reduced inflammation. We hypothesize that UDCA may improve glycemic control in GDM.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) versus placebo to improve maternal glycemia in GDM.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>single-site, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of UDCA in 113 women with GDM at 24-28 weeks' gestation. The primary outcome was maternal fasting blood glucose concentration at 35<sup>+0</sup>-37<sup>+6</sup> weeks' gestation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome did not differ significantly between groups when evaluated by intention to treat (treatment effect 0.98 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.05, p=0.61)); there were no differences in maternal or fetal secondary outcomes, including maternal weight change, need for insulin treatment, birthweight centile, proportion of large or small for gestational age infants, neonatal hypoglycemia or admission to the neonatal unit. A pre-specified secondary analysis measured serum concentrations of UDCA using UPLC-MS/MS and showed that participants taking larger numbers of tablets had higher serum concentrations of UDCA. Post hoc analysis revealed no difference in the rate of fasting blood glucose concentrations at or above the recommended target of 90mg/dL according to intention to treat (5/50 (10.0%) versus 8/53 (15.1%), RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.89, p=0.557). However, in patients with serum UDCA ≥0.5µmol/L, consistent with having taken UDCA, fewer patients had fasting glucose above target (2/42 (4.8%) versus 11/57 (19.3%), RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.06, p=0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial demonstrated no difference in fasting glycemia for women with GDM treated with UDCA compared to placebo. However, those with elevated serum UDCA concentrations were more likely to have fasting blood glucose concentrations below recommended thresholds, suggesting potential benefit of further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101732"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101732","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a pregnancy complication that can be associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Optimal glycemic control remains challenging for many patients despite existing management strategies. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is commonly used for cholestasis in pregnancy and has shown potential metabolic benefits, including improved insulin sensitivity and reduced inflammation. We hypothesize that UDCA may improve glycemic control in GDM.
Objective: to compare treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) versus placebo to improve maternal glycemia in GDM.
Study design: single-site, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of UDCA in 113 women with GDM at 24-28 weeks' gestation. The primary outcome was maternal fasting blood glucose concentration at 35+0-37+6 weeks' gestation.
Results: The primary outcome did not differ significantly between groups when evaluated by intention to treat (treatment effect 0.98 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.05, p=0.61)); there were no differences in maternal or fetal secondary outcomes, including maternal weight change, need for insulin treatment, birthweight centile, proportion of large or small for gestational age infants, neonatal hypoglycemia or admission to the neonatal unit. A pre-specified secondary analysis measured serum concentrations of UDCA using UPLC-MS/MS and showed that participants taking larger numbers of tablets had higher serum concentrations of UDCA. Post hoc analysis revealed no difference in the rate of fasting blood glucose concentrations at or above the recommended target of 90mg/dL according to intention to treat (5/50 (10.0%) versus 8/53 (15.1%), RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.89, p=0.557). However, in patients with serum UDCA ≥0.5µmol/L, consistent with having taken UDCA, fewer patients had fasting glucose above target (2/42 (4.8%) versus 11/57 (19.3%), RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.06, p=0.039).
Conclusions: This trial demonstrated no difference in fasting glycemia for women with GDM treated with UDCA compared to placebo. However, those with elevated serum UDCA concentrations were more likely to have fasting blood glucose concentrations below recommended thresholds, suggesting potential benefit of further investigation.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including:
Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women.
Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health.
Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child.
Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby.
Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.