Catalina de Paco Matallana PhD , Jose E. Blanco-Carnero PhD , Ana Company Calabuig MD , Manuela Fernandez PhD , Monika Lewanczyk MD , Matilda Burton MBChB , Xi Yang PhD , Alice L. Mitchell PhD , Anita Lovgren-Sandblom BSc , Hanns-Ulrich Marschall PhD , David Wright MD , Caroline Ovadia PhD , Kypros H. Nicolaides MD , Catherine Williamson MD
{"title":"Randomized controlled trial of the impact of ursodeoxycholic acid on glycemia in gestational diabetes mellitus: the GUARDS trial","authors":"Catalina de Paco Matallana PhD , Jose E. Blanco-Carnero PhD , Ana Company Calabuig MD , Manuela Fernandez PhD , Monika Lewanczyk MD , Matilda Burton MBChB , Xi Yang PhD , Alice L. Mitchell PhD , Anita Lovgren-Sandblom BSc , Hanns-Ulrich Marschall PhD , David Wright MD , Caroline Ovadia PhD , Kypros H. Nicolaides MD , Catherine Williamson MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>Gestational diabetes mellitus is a pregnancy complication that can be associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Optimal glycemic control remains challenging for many patients despite the existing management strategies. Ursodeoxycholic acid is commonly used for cholestasis of pregnancy and has shown potential metabolic benefits, including improved insulin sensitivity and reduced inflammation. We hypothesize that ursodeoxycholic acid may improve glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aimed to compare treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid vs placebo for improving maternal glycemia in gestational diabetes mellitus.</div></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN</h3><div>This was a single-site, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid in 113 women with gestational diabetes mellitus at 24 to 28 weeks’ gestation. The primary outcome was maternal fasting blood glucose concentration at 35<sup>+0</sup> to 37<sup>+6</sup> weeks’ gestation.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>The primary outcome did not differ significantly between groups when evaluated by intention to treat analysis (treatment effect, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.92–1.05; <em>P</em>=.61). There were no differences in maternal or fetal secondary outcomes, including maternal weight change, need for insulin treatment, birthweight centile, proportion of large or small for gestational age infants, neonatal hypoglycemia, or admission to the neonatal unit. A prespecified secondary analysis measured serum concentrations of ursodeoxycholic acid using ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry and showed that participants taking larger numbers of tablets had higher serum concentrations of ursodeoxycholic acid. Post hoc analysis revealed no difference in the rate of fasting blood glucose concentrations at or above the recommended target of 90 mg/dL according to intention to treat analysis (5/50 [10.0%] vs 8/53 [15.1%]; risk ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–1.89; <em>P</em>=.557). However, among patients with serum ursodeoxycholic acid ≥0.5 µmol/L (indicating adherence), fewer patients had fasting glucose levels above the target (2/42 [4.8%] vs 11/57 [19.3%]; risk ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.06–1.06; <em>P</em>=.039).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>This trial demonstrated no difference in fasting glycemia between women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and those treated with placebo. However, those with elevated serum ursodeoxycholic acid concentrations were more likely to have fasting blood glucose concentrations below the recommended thresholds, suggesting potential benefit of further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 9","pages":"Article 101732"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933325001326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Gestational diabetes mellitus is a pregnancy complication that can be associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Optimal glycemic control remains challenging for many patients despite the existing management strategies. Ursodeoxycholic acid is commonly used for cholestasis of pregnancy and has shown potential metabolic benefits, including improved insulin sensitivity and reduced inflammation. We hypothesize that ursodeoxycholic acid may improve glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to compare treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid vs placebo for improving maternal glycemia in gestational diabetes mellitus.
STUDY DESIGN
This was a single-site, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid in 113 women with gestational diabetes mellitus at 24 to 28 weeks’ gestation. The primary outcome was maternal fasting blood glucose concentration at 35+0 to 37+6 weeks’ gestation.
RESULTS
The primary outcome did not differ significantly between groups when evaluated by intention to treat analysis (treatment effect, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.92–1.05; P=.61). There were no differences in maternal or fetal secondary outcomes, including maternal weight change, need for insulin treatment, birthweight centile, proportion of large or small for gestational age infants, neonatal hypoglycemia, or admission to the neonatal unit. A prespecified secondary analysis measured serum concentrations of ursodeoxycholic acid using ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry and showed that participants taking larger numbers of tablets had higher serum concentrations of ursodeoxycholic acid. Post hoc analysis revealed no difference in the rate of fasting blood glucose concentrations at or above the recommended target of 90 mg/dL according to intention to treat analysis (5/50 [10.0%] vs 8/53 [15.1%]; risk ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–1.89; P=.557). However, among patients with serum ursodeoxycholic acid ≥0.5 µmol/L (indicating adherence), fewer patients had fasting glucose levels above the target (2/42 [4.8%] vs 11/57 [19.3%]; risk ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.06–1.06; P=.039).
CONCLUSION
This trial demonstrated no difference in fasting glycemia between women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and those treated with placebo. However, those with elevated serum ursodeoxycholic acid concentrations were more likely to have fasting blood glucose concentrations below the recommended thresholds, suggesting potential benefit of further investigation.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including:
Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women.
Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health.
Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child.
Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby.
Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.