Development and Validation of PT-PENCIL: The Physical Therapy Frequency Clinical Decision Support Tool to Increase Hospital Discharge to Home.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Brittany Lapin, Sandra Passek, Andrew Schuster, Mary Stilphen, Kate Minick, Dave S Collingridge, Beth Hunt, Devyn Woodfield, Michael B Rothberg, Joshua K Johnson
{"title":"Development and Validation of PT-PENCIL: The Physical Therapy Frequency Clinical Decision Support Tool to Increase Hospital Discharge to Home.","authors":"Brittany Lapin, Sandra Passek, Andrew Schuster, Mary Stilphen, Kate Minick, Dave S Collingridge, Beth Hunt, Devyn Woodfield, Michael B Rothberg, Joshua K Johnson","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Identifying patients most likely to benefit from physical therapy in the hospital could aid physical therapists in optimizing treatment allocation for the purpose of increasing discharge to home.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to develop and externally validate a predictive model for discharge to home on the basis of physical therapy frequency for patients who were hospitalized.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A predictive model was developed using retrospective cohort data collected between April 2017 and August 2022, with external validation conducted in a separate sample.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The setting was a large health system.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were adult patients who were hospitalized and received physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Predictors were extracted from the electronic health record and included demographics, clinical characteristics, and therapist-entered variables such as home set-up and prehospital level of function. Physical therapy frequency was quantified as once daily, defined as ≥5 times per week. The outcome was discharge to home. Variables were included in the final multivariable logistic regression model on the basis of associations with physical therapy frequency and/or outcome and clinical relevance. Calibration and discrimination of the models were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The development sample included 205,659 adult patient (average age = 72.2 [SD = 14.3] years; 55.3% female) hospitalizations, with 52.5% of patients receiving physical therapy daily and an overall proportion of 67.1% being discharged to home. The final multivariable model included 8 variables, with good calibration and discrimination. Internal validity was established with an optimism-corrected concordance statistic of 0.874 (95% CI = 0.872-0.875). The external sample included 102,311 patient (average age = 67.7 [SD = 16.5] years; 50.9% female) admissions, with 64.5% of patients receiving physical therapy daily and 77.8% being discharged to home. Predictive performance was high (calibration slope = 0.908), and discrimination was good (concordance statistic = 0.851).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study developed and externally validated the underlying prediction model for a clinical decision support tool, termed Physical Therapy Frequency Clinical Decision Support Tool (PT-PENCIL), to identify patients most likely to benefit from daily physical therapy to discharge to home. Future work will evaluate the implementation of PT-PENCIL to determine its effect on patient-centered outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Identifying patients most likely to benefit from physical therapy in the hospital could aid physical therapists in optimizing treatment allocation for the purpose of increasing discharge to home.

Objective: The aims of this study were to develop and externally validate a predictive model for discharge to home on the basis of physical therapy frequency for patients who were hospitalized.

Design: A predictive model was developed using retrospective cohort data collected between April 2017 and August 2022, with external validation conducted in a separate sample.

Setting: The setting was a large health system.

Participants: Participants were adult patients who were hospitalized and received physical therapy.

Main outcome and measures: Predictors were extracted from the electronic health record and included demographics, clinical characteristics, and therapist-entered variables such as home set-up and prehospital level of function. Physical therapy frequency was quantified as once daily, defined as ≥5 times per week. The outcome was discharge to home. Variables were included in the final multivariable logistic regression model on the basis of associations with physical therapy frequency and/or outcome and clinical relevance. Calibration and discrimination of the models were assessed.

Results: The development sample included 205,659 adult patient (average age = 72.2 [SD = 14.3] years; 55.3% female) hospitalizations, with 52.5% of patients receiving physical therapy daily and an overall proportion of 67.1% being discharged to home. The final multivariable model included 8 variables, with good calibration and discrimination. Internal validity was established with an optimism-corrected concordance statistic of 0.874 (95% CI = 0.872-0.875). The external sample included 102,311 patient (average age = 67.7 [SD = 16.5] years; 50.9% female) admissions, with 64.5% of patients receiving physical therapy daily and 77.8% being discharged to home. Predictive performance was high (calibration slope = 0.908), and discrimination was good (concordance statistic = 0.851).

Conclusions and relevance: This study developed and externally validated the underlying prediction model for a clinical decision support tool, termed Physical Therapy Frequency Clinical Decision Support Tool (PT-PENCIL), to identify patients most likely to benefit from daily physical therapy to discharge to home. Future work will evaluate the implementation of PT-PENCIL to determine its effect on patient-centered outcomes.

PT-PENCIL的开发和验证:物理治疗频率临床决策支持工具,以增加出院回家。
重要性:确定最有可能从医院物理治疗中受益的患者可以帮助物理治疗师优化治疗分配,以增加出院回家的目的。目的:本研究的目的是建立一个基于住院患者物理治疗频率的出院预测模型并进行外部验证。设计:使用2017年4月至2022年8月期间收集的回顾性队列数据建立预测模型,并在单独的样本中进行外部验证。背景:背景是一个大型的卫生系统。参与者:参与者为住院并接受物理治疗的成年患者。主要结局和措施:预测因子从电子健康记录中提取,包括人口统计学、临床特征和治疗师输入的变量,如家庭设置和院前功能水平。物理治疗频率量化为每日1次,定义为每周≥5次。结果是被遣散回家。根据与物理治疗频率和/或结果和临床相关性的关联,将变量纳入最终的多变量logistic回归模型。对模型的校正和判别进行了评估。结果:发展样本包括205,659例成人患者(平均年龄= 72.2 [SD = 14.3]岁;(55.3%为女性)住院,52.5%的患者每天接受物理治疗,出院回家的总比例为67.1%。最终的多变量模型包含8个变量,具有良好的校正和判别性。内部效度建立,乐观校正的一致性统计量为0.874 (95% CI = 0.872-0.875)。外部样本包括102311例患者(平均年龄= 67.7 [SD = 16.5]岁;50.9%为女性),每天接受物理治疗的患者占64.5%,出院回家的患者占77.8%。预测性能高(校准斜率= 0.908),判别性好(一致性统计量= 0.851)。结论和相关性:本研究开发并外部验证了临床决策支持工具的潜在预测模型,称为物理治疗频率临床决策支持工具(PT-PENCIL),以确定最有可能从日常物理治疗中受益的患者出院回家。未来的工作将评估PT-PENCIL的实施,以确定其对以患者为中心的结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信