Extensor mechanism injury/failure following spacer dislocation in periprosthetic joint infection: a case series in a single reference center.

Q1 Medicine
A Mei, M Scazzarriello, D Brioschi, M Larghi, A Manzotti
{"title":"Extensor mechanism injury/failure following spacer dislocation in periprosthetic joint infection: a case series in a single reference center.","authors":"A Mei, M Scazzarriello, D Brioschi, M Larghi, A Manzotti","doi":"10.1007/s12306-025-00907-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotic-loaded spacers are widely used in the two-stage revision protocol for managing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) of the knee, offering effective local antibiotic delivery while maintaining joint space and soft tissue tension. However, despite their clinical benefits, complications such as extensor mechanism rupture remain under-recognized and can severely compromise functional outcomes. This retrospective case series presents consecutive patients treated between 2014 and 2022 by a single orthopedic team at our institution. All patients were diagnosed with knee PJI and experienced extensor mechanism rupture following the implantation of either static or dynamic antibiotic-loaded spacers. The analysis highlights the multifactorial etiology of this complication, including factors such as severe bone loss, suboptimal spacer positioning or design, repeated debridements, and individual patient risks such as obesity and previous surgical history. Dynamic spacers, while allowing partial joint mobility, were associated with a higher risk of mechanical overload, whereas static spacers posed risks related to rigidity and stress transmission. Surgical management in all cases involved radical debridement, assessment of bone loss and femoral canal diameter, and careful selection of spacer type. Awareness of the potential for extensor mechanism injury should inform both surgical technique and postoperative care strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-025-00907-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibiotic-loaded spacers are widely used in the two-stage revision protocol for managing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) of the knee, offering effective local antibiotic delivery while maintaining joint space and soft tissue tension. However, despite their clinical benefits, complications such as extensor mechanism rupture remain under-recognized and can severely compromise functional outcomes. This retrospective case series presents consecutive patients treated between 2014 and 2022 by a single orthopedic team at our institution. All patients were diagnosed with knee PJI and experienced extensor mechanism rupture following the implantation of either static or dynamic antibiotic-loaded spacers. The analysis highlights the multifactorial etiology of this complication, including factors such as severe bone loss, suboptimal spacer positioning or design, repeated debridements, and individual patient risks such as obesity and previous surgical history. Dynamic spacers, while allowing partial joint mobility, were associated with a higher risk of mechanical overload, whereas static spacers posed risks related to rigidity and stress transmission. Surgical management in all cases involved radical debridement, assessment of bone loss and femoral canal diameter, and careful selection of spacer type. Awareness of the potential for extensor mechanism injury should inform both surgical technique and postoperative care strategies.

假体周围关节感染中间隔器脱位后伸肌机制损伤/失效:单一参考中心的病例系列。
抗生素装载垫片广泛应用于膝关节假体周围关节感染(PJIs)的两阶段翻修方案中,在保持关节空间和软组织张力的同时提供有效的局部抗生素递送。然而,尽管有临床益处,但伸肌机制断裂等并发症仍未得到充分认识,并可能严重损害功能预后。本回顾性病例系列介绍了2014年至2022年间由我院单一骨科团队治疗的连续患者。所有患者均被诊断为膝关节PJI,并在植入静态或动态载抗生素垫片后发生伸肌机制断裂。该分析强调了该并发症的多因素病因,包括严重骨质流失、垫片定位或设计不理想、反复清创以及个体患者风险,如肥胖和既往手术史。动态垫片虽然允许部分关节活动,但存在较高的机械过载风险,而静态垫片则存在刚性和应力传递相关风险。所有病例的手术处理包括彻底清创,评估骨丢失和股管直径,并仔细选择垫片类型。意识到潜在的伸肌机制损伤应告知手术技术和术后护理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信