Developing and Implementing an Intervention to Increase Immunization Coverage Among Frontline Long-Term Care Staff

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Elizabeth A. Sobczyk MSW, MPH , Ellen M. Schultz MS , Angela K. Shen ScD, MPH , David M. Casey PhD , Heather L. Roney MA , Sheena A. Bumpas CNA, GCS , Leslie B. Eber MD, CMD , Amy Parker Fiebelkorn MSN, MPH
{"title":"Developing and Implementing an Intervention to Increase Immunization Coverage Among Frontline Long-Term Care Staff","authors":"Elizabeth A. Sobczyk MSW, MPH ,&nbsp;Ellen M. Schultz MS ,&nbsp;Angela K. Shen ScD, MPH ,&nbsp;David M. Casey PhD ,&nbsp;Heather L. Roney MA ,&nbsp;Sheena A. Bumpas CNA, GCS ,&nbsp;Leslie B. Eber MD, CMD ,&nbsp;Amy Parker Fiebelkorn MSN, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the years following the COVID-19 pandemic, immunization coverage has declined among frontline post-acute and long-term care (PALTC) staff, such as nurses, certified nursing assistants, and kitchen staff. We took a novel approach to addressing these declines by engaging frontline staff in design of immunization-focused professional development by surveying a convenience sample of 200 frontline PALTC staff to understand their attitudes toward immunization and preferences for job-related education and training. Frontline staff reported being motivated to protect themselves and residents from illness but were skeptical about the ability of vaccines to do so. Many felt strongly that immunization is a personal choice and wanted objective and reliable information on vaccines. We used this learning to design a 45-minute in-service for frontline staff that presented information on the benefits and risks of recommended immunization for PALTC residents and staff in a neutral way that respected staff autonomy. Accompanying brief online training prepared supervisors to deliver the in-service and answer staff questions. To evaluate the training, we surveyed a separate convenience sample of supervisors at 3 PALTC facilities, and all positively evaluated the in-service materials and training. The core focus of this innovative approach is centered on trusted messengers sharing reliable and relevant vaccine information in respectful ways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 9","pages":"Article 105761"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025002786","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the years following the COVID-19 pandemic, immunization coverage has declined among frontline post-acute and long-term care (PALTC) staff, such as nurses, certified nursing assistants, and kitchen staff. We took a novel approach to addressing these declines by engaging frontline staff in design of immunization-focused professional development by surveying a convenience sample of 200 frontline PALTC staff to understand their attitudes toward immunization and preferences for job-related education and training. Frontline staff reported being motivated to protect themselves and residents from illness but were skeptical about the ability of vaccines to do so. Many felt strongly that immunization is a personal choice and wanted objective and reliable information on vaccines. We used this learning to design a 45-minute in-service for frontline staff that presented information on the benefits and risks of recommended immunization for PALTC residents and staff in a neutral way that respected staff autonomy. Accompanying brief online training prepared supervisors to deliver the in-service and answer staff questions. To evaluate the training, we surveyed a separate convenience sample of supervisors at 3 PALTC facilities, and all positively evaluated the in-service materials and training. The core focus of this innovative approach is centered on trusted messengers sharing reliable and relevant vaccine information in respectful ways.
制定和实施一项干预措施,以提高一线长期护理人员的免疫覆盖率。
在2019冠状病毒病大流行后的几年里,一线急性和长期护理后工作人员(如护士、持证护理助理和厨房工作人员)的免疫覆盖率有所下降。为了解决这一问题,我们采用了一种新颖的方法,通过对200名PALTC一线员工进行方便抽样调查,了解他们对免疫接种的态度以及对与工作相关的教育和培训的偏好,让一线员工参与以免疫接种为重点的专业发展设计。一线工作人员报告说,他们有动力保护自己和居民免受疾病的侵害,但对疫苗的能力持怀疑态度。许多人强烈认为,免疫接种是个人的选择,需要关于疫苗的客观可靠的信息。我们利用这种学习为一线工作人员设计了一个45分钟的服务,以中立的方式向PALTC居民和工作人员介绍推荐的免疫接种的好处和风险,并尊重员工的自主权。伴随的简短在线培训为主管提供在职培训和回答员工问题做好了准备。为了评估培训,我们对3个PALTC设施的主管进行了单独的便利抽样调查,所有人都对在职材料和培训进行了积极评价。这一创新办法的核心重点是让受信任的信使以尊重的方式分享可靠和相关的疫苗信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信