Does the upper line of the sacral ala approximate a horizontal line on pelvic radiographs of idiopathic scoliosis?

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Masaki Ikejiri, Hideki Shigematsu, Sachiko Kawasaki, Yuma Suga, Takahiro Mui, Yasuhito Tanaka
{"title":"Does the upper line of the sacral ala approximate a horizontal line on pelvic radiographs of idiopathic scoliosis?","authors":"Masaki Ikejiri, Hideki Shigematsu, Sachiko Kawasaki, Yuma Suga, Takahiro Mui, Yasuhito Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) corrective surgery is selected using the center sacral vertical line on supine side-bending radiographs. However, a horizontal line reference is not possible on supine radiographs. Therefore, we aimed to determine the pelvic reference line that best reflects the horizontal line, which can be used in determining the LIV on supine side-bending radiograph in patients with AIS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with AIS (n = 258) were evaluated. On whole-spine standing anteroposterior radiographs, three lines were selected (the upper sacral line [USL], sacroiliac joint line [SIL], and upper iliac line [UIL]) and compared with the horizontal line to investigate tilt angles. Patients were allocated into thoracic (T; n = 90), lumbar (L; n = 61), and double (D; n = 107) curve groups based on thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean USL; SIL; and UIL tilts were 2.3°, 4.7°, and 3.8°; 1.6°, 2.0°, and 2.0°; and 1.4°, 2.2°, and 1.8° in the T, L, and D groups, respectively. The USL was significantly tilted in all groups, without significant difference between the SIL and UIL tilts. The USL tilted significantly more from the horizontal line in the L and D groups than in the T group; the UIL tilted more in the L group compared with the T group. The SIL tilt was comparable between the groups. The Cobb angle on the thoracolumbar or lumbar curve significantly, albeit weakly, correlated with the USL and UIL tilt.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On whole-spine standing anteroposterior radiographs, the USL had the greatest tilt (mean: 3.5°), whereas the SIL had the smallest tilt (mean: 1.8°) without significant variation across scoliosis types. Independent of Cobb angle and scoliosis type, the SIL was the most stable and reliable reference line for horizontal alignment, making it the preferred reference to LIV selection in patients undergoing AIS corrective surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.06.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) corrective surgery is selected using the center sacral vertical line on supine side-bending radiographs. However, a horizontal line reference is not possible on supine radiographs. Therefore, we aimed to determine the pelvic reference line that best reflects the horizontal line, which can be used in determining the LIV on supine side-bending radiograph in patients with AIS.

Methods: Patients with AIS (n = 258) were evaluated. On whole-spine standing anteroposterior radiographs, three lines were selected (the upper sacral line [USL], sacroiliac joint line [SIL], and upper iliac line [UIL]) and compared with the horizontal line to investigate tilt angles. Patients were allocated into thoracic (T; n = 90), lumbar (L; n = 61), and double (D; n = 107) curve groups based on thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles.

Results: The mean USL; SIL; and UIL tilts were 2.3°, 4.7°, and 3.8°; 1.6°, 2.0°, and 2.0°; and 1.4°, 2.2°, and 1.8° in the T, L, and D groups, respectively. The USL was significantly tilted in all groups, without significant difference between the SIL and UIL tilts. The USL tilted significantly more from the horizontal line in the L and D groups than in the T group; the UIL tilted more in the L group compared with the T group. The SIL tilt was comparable between the groups. The Cobb angle on the thoracolumbar or lumbar curve significantly, albeit weakly, correlated with the USL and UIL tilt.

Conclusions: On whole-spine standing anteroposterior radiographs, the USL had the greatest tilt (mean: 3.5°), whereas the SIL had the smallest tilt (mean: 1.8°) without significant variation across scoliosis types. Independent of Cobb angle and scoliosis type, the SIL was the most stable and reliable reference line for horizontal alignment, making it the preferred reference to LIV selection in patients undergoing AIS corrective surgery.

在特发性脊柱侧凸的骨盆x线片上,骶骨侧翼的上线是否与水平线接近?
背景:在青少年特发性脊柱侧弯(AIS)矫正手术中,使用仰卧侧弯x线片上的骶骨中心垂直线选择下固定椎体(LIV)。然而,在仰卧位x线片上不可能有水平线参考。因此,我们旨在确定最能反映水平线的骨盆参考线,该参考线可用于确定AIS患者仰卧侧弯x线片上的LIV。方法:对258例AIS患者进行评估。在全脊柱站立正位x线片上,选择三条线(骶骨上线[USL]、骶髂关节线[SIL]和髂上线[UIL])与水平线进行比较以研究倾斜角度。患者被分为胸(T)组;n = 90),腰椎(L;n = 61),双(D;n = 107)基于胸椎和腰椎Cobb角的曲线组。结果:平均USL;银;il倾角分别为2.3°、4.7°和3.8°;1.6°、2.0°、2.0°;T、L和D组分别为1.4°、2.2°和1.8°。所有组的USL均显著倾斜,SIL和il的倾斜无显著差异。与T组相比,L组和D组的USL更偏向于水平线;与T组相比,L组的UIL倾斜更多。两组间SIL倾斜具有可比性。胸腰椎或腰椎弯曲处的Cobb角与USL和UIL倾斜有显著相关性,尽管相关性较弱。结论:在全脊柱站立正位x线片上,USL倾斜最大(平均值:3.5°),而SIL倾斜最小(平均值:1.8°),不同脊柱侧凸类型无显著差异。与Cobb角和脊柱侧凸类型无关,SIL是水平对准最稳定可靠的参考线,是AIS矫正手术患者选择LIV的首选参考线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信