Predictors of e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma: findings from a cross-sectional population-based study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Najim Z Alshahrani
{"title":"Predictors of e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma: findings from a cross-sectional population-based study.","authors":"Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Najim Z Alshahrani","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04045-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) among individuals with asthma is rising, yet limited evidence exists on predictors of use in this clinical population. Understanding factors associated with e-cigarette use may help inform public health interventions. In this study, we analysed data from 2671 individuals aged 16 years and older with doctor-diagnosed asthma, drawn from the 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021 waves of the Scottish Health Survey. Current e-cigarette use was defined as self-reported use at the time of the survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors associated with current e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma, estimating adjusted odds ratios (aORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p values for age, sex, education, socio-economic deprivation, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and self-rated health. Overall, 193 participants (7.2%) reported current e-cigarette use. Current smokers had significantly higher odds of using e-cigarettes compared to never smokers (aOR: 38.9; 95% CI: 18.5-82.0; p < 0.001). Former smokers also had increased odds of e-cigarette use relative to never smokers (aOR: 32.0; 95% CI: 15.2-67.2; p < 0.001). Each one-category increase in age group (spanning approximately 10 years) was associated with a 23% reduction in the odds of current e-cigarette use (aOR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.86; p < 0.001). Participants living in less deprived areas had 15% lower odds of current e-cigarette use for each one-quintile increase in the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74-0.97; p = 0.016). E-cigarette use was not significantly associated with sex, educational level, alcohol consumption, or self-rated health. These findings indicate that e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma is more prevalent among younger participants, those living in socioeconomically deprived areas, and those with a current or former smoking history. Further longitudinal research is needed to explore usage trajectories and respiratory health impacts in this clinical population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04045-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) among individuals with asthma is rising, yet limited evidence exists on predictors of use in this clinical population. Understanding factors associated with e-cigarette use may help inform public health interventions. In this study, we analysed data from 2671 individuals aged 16 years and older with doctor-diagnosed asthma, drawn from the 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021 waves of the Scottish Health Survey. Current e-cigarette use was defined as self-reported use at the time of the survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors associated with current e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma, estimating adjusted odds ratios (aORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p values for age, sex, education, socio-economic deprivation, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and self-rated health. Overall, 193 participants (7.2%) reported current e-cigarette use. Current smokers had significantly higher odds of using e-cigarettes compared to never smokers (aOR: 38.9; 95% CI: 18.5-82.0; p < 0.001). Former smokers also had increased odds of e-cigarette use relative to never smokers (aOR: 32.0; 95% CI: 15.2-67.2; p < 0.001). Each one-category increase in age group (spanning approximately 10 years) was associated with a 23% reduction in the odds of current e-cigarette use (aOR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.86; p < 0.001). Participants living in less deprived areas had 15% lower odds of current e-cigarette use for each one-quintile increase in the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74-0.97; p = 0.016). E-cigarette use was not significantly associated with sex, educational level, alcohol consumption, or self-rated health. These findings indicate that e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma is more prevalent among younger participants, those living in socioeconomically deprived areas, and those with a current or former smoking history. Further longitudinal research is needed to explore usage trajectories and respiratory health impacts in this clinical population.

哮喘患者使用电子烟的预测因素:一项基于人群的横断面研究的结果
哮喘患者中使用电子烟(电子烟)的人数正在上升,但这一临床人群中使用电子烟的预测因素证据有限。了解与电子烟使用相关的因素可能有助于为公共卫生干预提供信息。在这项研究中,我们分析了2671名16岁及以上的医生诊断哮喘患者的数据,这些数据来自苏格兰健康调查的2017年、2018年、2019年和2021年。目前的电子烟使用被定义为在调查时自我报告的使用情况。我们使用多变量logistic回归检查哮喘患者中与当前电子烟使用相关的因素,估计年龄、性别、教育、社会经济剥夺、吸烟状况、饮酒和自评健康状况的调整优势比(aORs)、95%置信区间(CIs)和p值。总体而言,193名参与者(7.2%)报告了目前使用电子烟的情况。与从不吸烟者相比,当前吸烟者使用电子烟的几率明显更高(aOR: 38.9;95% ci: 18.5-82.0;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信