{"title":"Predictors of e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma: findings from a cross-sectional population-based study.","authors":"Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Najim Z Alshahrani","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04045-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) among individuals with asthma is rising, yet limited evidence exists on predictors of use in this clinical population. Understanding factors associated with e-cigarette use may help inform public health interventions. In this study, we analysed data from 2671 individuals aged 16 years and older with doctor-diagnosed asthma, drawn from the 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021 waves of the Scottish Health Survey. Current e-cigarette use was defined as self-reported use at the time of the survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors associated with current e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma, estimating adjusted odds ratios (aORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p values for age, sex, education, socio-economic deprivation, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and self-rated health. Overall, 193 participants (7.2%) reported current e-cigarette use. Current smokers had significantly higher odds of using e-cigarettes compared to never smokers (aOR: 38.9; 95% CI: 18.5-82.0; p < 0.001). Former smokers also had increased odds of e-cigarette use relative to never smokers (aOR: 32.0; 95% CI: 15.2-67.2; p < 0.001). Each one-category increase in age group (spanning approximately 10 years) was associated with a 23% reduction in the odds of current e-cigarette use (aOR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.86; p < 0.001). Participants living in less deprived areas had 15% lower odds of current e-cigarette use for each one-quintile increase in the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74-0.97; p = 0.016). E-cigarette use was not significantly associated with sex, educational level, alcohol consumption, or self-rated health. These findings indicate that e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma is more prevalent among younger participants, those living in socioeconomically deprived areas, and those with a current or former smoking history. Further longitudinal research is needed to explore usage trajectories and respiratory health impacts in this clinical population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04045-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) among individuals with asthma is rising, yet limited evidence exists on predictors of use in this clinical population. Understanding factors associated with e-cigarette use may help inform public health interventions. In this study, we analysed data from 2671 individuals aged 16 years and older with doctor-diagnosed asthma, drawn from the 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021 waves of the Scottish Health Survey. Current e-cigarette use was defined as self-reported use at the time of the survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors associated with current e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma, estimating adjusted odds ratios (aORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p values for age, sex, education, socio-economic deprivation, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and self-rated health. Overall, 193 participants (7.2%) reported current e-cigarette use. Current smokers had significantly higher odds of using e-cigarettes compared to never smokers (aOR: 38.9; 95% CI: 18.5-82.0; p < 0.001). Former smokers also had increased odds of e-cigarette use relative to never smokers (aOR: 32.0; 95% CI: 15.2-67.2; p < 0.001). Each one-category increase in age group (spanning approximately 10 years) was associated with a 23% reduction in the odds of current e-cigarette use (aOR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.86; p < 0.001). Participants living in less deprived areas had 15% lower odds of current e-cigarette use for each one-quintile increase in the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74-0.97; p = 0.016). E-cigarette use was not significantly associated with sex, educational level, alcohol consumption, or self-rated health. These findings indicate that e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma is more prevalent among younger participants, those living in socioeconomically deprived areas, and those with a current or former smoking history. Further longitudinal research is needed to explore usage trajectories and respiratory health impacts in this clinical population.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.