The Value of Interventions Aimed at Improving the Patient Experience: Systematic Review of Economic Impacts and Provider Well-Being Outcomes.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tiago S Jesus, Dongwook Lee, Brocha Z Stern, Manrui Zhang, Jan Struhar, Allen W Heinemann, Anne Deutsch, Neil Jordan
{"title":"The Value of Interventions Aimed at Improving the Patient Experience: Systematic Review of Economic Impacts and Provider Well-Being Outcomes.","authors":"Tiago S Jesus, Dongwook Lee, Brocha Z Stern, Manrui Zhang, Jan Struhar, Allen W Heinemann, Anne Deutsch, Neil Jordan","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13131622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although improving the patient experience with care is being framed as part of value-based care, the economic and provider well-being impact of interventions for improving the patient experience has not been established. We aimed to synthesize the contemporary (2015-2024) empirical literature on the economic (e.g., costs, revenue) and other value-based impacts (e.g., provider well-being) of patient-experience improvement interventions. <b>Methods:</b> Systematic review using six databases of scientific literature (PubMed, EconLit, CINAHL, PsycINFO, DOAJ, and Scopus) supplemented by journal-specific and snowball searches following a registered study protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022358337). Two independent reviewers performed eligibility decisions and quality appraisals of the study methods and economic assessments, when applicable; the latter was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute's checklist for economic evaluations. <b>Results:</b> Out of 1317 unique references, nine were included. Four studies assessed the effectiveness of patient experience improvement interventions (e.g., provider communication training, discharge or transitional support) coupled with economic evaluations; these found statistically significant positive outcomes for both patient experience and economic dimensions-including reduced costs, improved revenue, or additional costs offset by increased revenue. Three additional studies on provider communication training also found statistically significant positive impacts on provider well-being (i.e., reduced burnout) and patient experience improvements. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings shed light on the overall synergistic value of and business case for investments into developing patient experience improvement programs or activities. However, there is room for strengthening this body of knowledge in scope, volume, and method quality, including the need to study the impact on patient experience, provider well-being, health outcomes, and costs (i.e., the <i>quadruple aim</i>) in tandem.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12249292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13131622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although improving the patient experience with care is being framed as part of value-based care, the economic and provider well-being impact of interventions for improving the patient experience has not been established. We aimed to synthesize the contemporary (2015-2024) empirical literature on the economic (e.g., costs, revenue) and other value-based impacts (e.g., provider well-being) of patient-experience improvement interventions. Methods: Systematic review using six databases of scientific literature (PubMed, EconLit, CINAHL, PsycINFO, DOAJ, and Scopus) supplemented by journal-specific and snowball searches following a registered study protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022358337). Two independent reviewers performed eligibility decisions and quality appraisals of the study methods and economic assessments, when applicable; the latter was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute's checklist for economic evaluations. Results: Out of 1317 unique references, nine were included. Four studies assessed the effectiveness of patient experience improvement interventions (e.g., provider communication training, discharge or transitional support) coupled with economic evaluations; these found statistically significant positive outcomes for both patient experience and economic dimensions-including reduced costs, improved revenue, or additional costs offset by increased revenue. Three additional studies on provider communication training also found statistically significant positive impacts on provider well-being (i.e., reduced burnout) and patient experience improvements. Conclusion: These findings shed light on the overall synergistic value of and business case for investments into developing patient experience improvement programs or activities. However, there is room for strengthening this body of knowledge in scope, volume, and method quality, including the need to study the impact on patient experience, provider well-being, health outcomes, and costs (i.e., the quadruple aim) in tandem.

旨在改善患者体验的干预措施的价值:经济影响和提供者福祉结果的系统回顾。
背景:虽然改善患者的护理体验被视为基于价值的护理的一部分,但改善患者体验的干预措施的经济和提供者福祉影响尚未确定。我们的目标是综合当代(2015-2024)关于患者体验改善干预措施的经济(如成本、收入)和其他基于价值的影响(如提供者福祉)的实证文献。方法:使用6个科学文献数据库(PubMed, EconLit, CINAHL, PsycINFO, DOAJ和Scopus)进行系统评价,并根据注册研究方案(PROSPERO: CRD42022358337)进行期刊特定搜索和滚雪球搜索。两名独立审稿人对研究方法和经济评估(如适用)进行了资格决定和质量评价;后者是使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的经济评估清单进行的。结果:1317篇文献中有9篇被纳入。四项研究评估了患者体验改善干预措施(例如,提供者沟通培训,出院或过渡支持)与经济评估相结合的有效性;这些研究发现,在患者体验和经济维度上都有统计学上显著的积极结果,包括降低成本、提高收入或增加收入抵消额外成本。另外三项关于提供者沟通培训的研究也发现,在统计上对提供者福利(即减少倦怠)和患者体验改善有显著的积极影响。结论:这些发现揭示了投资开发患者体验改善项目或活动的整体协同价值和商业案例。然而,在范围、数量和方法质量方面仍有加强这一知识体系的空间,包括需要同时研究对患者体验、提供者福祉、健康结果和成本(即“四重目标”)的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信