Xiong Sun, Tuo Ruan, Yao Lin, Chengguo Li, Qian Shen, Tianhao Li, Jianing Ding, Yuping Yin, Kaixiong Tao
{"title":"Prognostic value of Naples prognostic score for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.","authors":"Xiong Sun, Tuo Ruan, Yao Lin, Chengguo Li, Qian Shen, Tianhao Li, Jianing Ding, Yuping Yin, Kaixiong Tao","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2532365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The parameters of the Naples prognostic score (NPS) include albumin, total cholesterol, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative NPS in locally advanced gastric cancer(LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The NPS was calculated and patients were then divided into two groups according to their NPS values as follows: NPS = 0-2 (group 1), NPS = 3-4 (group 2). Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis were used to identify independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS), and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (t-ROC) curves were carried to evaluate the discriminatory capacity of the prognostic scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 patients were included in this study. The 1- and 2-year OS rates in group 1 were 100.0% and 95.7%, group 2 exhibited rates of 95.7% and 84.4%. Multivariate cox analysis demonstrated that NPS was an independent prognostic factor of OS (<i>p</i> = 0.009). Furthermore, NPS exhibited better prognostic performance in the prediction of OS than additional prognostic scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NPS is a significant prognostic indicator and can be a reliable predictor of survival in LAGC patients underwent radical resection after NCIT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2605-2613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2532365","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The parameters of the Naples prognostic score (NPS) include albumin, total cholesterol, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative NPS in locally advanced gastric cancer(LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT).
Research design and methods: The NPS was calculated and patients were then divided into two groups according to their NPS values as follows: NPS = 0-2 (group 1), NPS = 3-4 (group 2). Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis were used to identify independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS), and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (t-ROC) curves were carried to evaluate the discriminatory capacity of the prognostic scoring systems.
Results: A total of 117 patients were included in this study. The 1- and 2-year OS rates in group 1 were 100.0% and 95.7%, group 2 exhibited rates of 95.7% and 84.4%. Multivariate cox analysis demonstrated that NPS was an independent prognostic factor of OS (p = 0.009). Furthermore, NPS exhibited better prognostic performance in the prediction of OS than additional prognostic scoring systems.
Conclusions: NPS is a significant prognostic indicator and can be a reliable predictor of survival in LAGC patients underwent radical resection after NCIT.
期刊介绍:
Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community.
The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.