Efficacy of Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy in Patients with DNA Mismatch Repair-deficient Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Sandra van Wilpe, Tarek Taha, Emily C Rothmann, Ellery Altshuler, Joe Park, Elisa M Ledet, Christian Rothermundt, Andre M Bergman, Annelieke E C A B Willemsen, Petros Tsantoulis, Jan Oldenburg, Alice Bernard-Tessier, Karim Fizazi, Debbie G J Robbrecht, Cheryl P Bruijnen, Tom van der Hulle, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Aurelius Omlin, Henrik Grönberg, Andrew J Armstrong, Oliver Sartor, Laura A Sena, Himisha Beltran, Johann S de Bono, Niven Mehra
{"title":"Efficacy of Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy in Patients with DNA Mismatch Repair-deficient Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Sandra van Wilpe, Tarek Taha, Emily C Rothmann, Ellery Altshuler, Joe Park, Elisa M Ledet, Christian Rothermundt, Andre M Bergman, Annelieke E C A B Willemsen, Petros Tsantoulis, Jan Oldenburg, Alice Bernard-Tessier, Karim Fizazi, Debbie G J Robbrecht, Cheryl P Bruijnen, Tom van der Hulle, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Aurelius Omlin, Henrik Grönberg, Andrew J Armstrong, Oliver Sartor, Laura A Sena, Himisha Beltran, Johann S de Bono, Niven Mehra","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Up to 5% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harbour loss-of-function alterations in mismatch repair genes (dMMR) resulting in microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Data on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in dMMR mCRPC are limited, and reimbursement for these agents is not universally available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an international, multicentre, retrospective study to investigate the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in dMMR mCRPC. dMMR was defined as MMR protein loss on immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or a deleterious alteration in an MMR gene or MSI-H status according to polymerase chain reaction analysis or next-generation sequencing. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Between July 2016 and July 2024, 93 patients with a median age of 70 yr (range 46-90) started anti-PD-(L)1 treatment. Patients were classified as dMMR on the basis of IHC results (n = 37, 40%), genomic alterations in MMR genes (n = 55, 59%), and/or an MSI-H phenotype (n = 64, 69%). Among evaluable patients according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v1.1, the objective response rate was 46% (n = 84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 35-58%). A prostate-specific antigen decline ≥50% was observed in 60% of evaluable patients (n = 68; 95% CI 48-72%). Median PFS across the entire cohort was 7.7 mo (95% CI 5.3-12.4), with 1-yr, 2-yr, and 3-yr PFS rates of 39%, 27%, and 26%, respectively. Median overall survival was 27.0 mo (95% CI 17.7-43.5). PFS was significantly longer for patients with positive dMMR status on two or more tests than for patients with just one positive dMMR test.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>These data confirm the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in patients with dMMR mCRPC and warrant consideration of reimbursement for anti-PD-(L)1 agents in dMMR mCRPC by health authorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Up to 5% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harbour loss-of-function alterations in mismatch repair genes (dMMR) resulting in microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Data on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in dMMR mCRPC are limited, and reimbursement for these agents is not universally available.

Methods: We performed an international, multicentre, retrospective study to investigate the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in dMMR mCRPC. dMMR was defined as MMR protein loss on immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or a deleterious alteration in an MMR gene or MSI-H status according to polymerase chain reaction analysis or next-generation sequencing. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Key findings and limitations: Between July 2016 and July 2024, 93 patients with a median age of 70 yr (range 46-90) started anti-PD-(L)1 treatment. Patients were classified as dMMR on the basis of IHC results (n = 37, 40%), genomic alterations in MMR genes (n = 55, 59%), and/or an MSI-H phenotype (n = 64, 69%). Among evaluable patients according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v1.1, the objective response rate was 46% (n = 84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 35-58%). A prostate-specific antigen decline ≥50% was observed in 60% of evaluable patients (n = 68; 95% CI 48-72%). Median PFS across the entire cohort was 7.7 mo (95% CI 5.3-12.4), with 1-yr, 2-yr, and 3-yr PFS rates of 39%, 27%, and 26%, respectively. Median overall survival was 27.0 mo (95% CI 17.7-43.5). PFS was significantly longer for patients with positive dMMR status on two or more tests than for patients with just one positive dMMR test.

Conclusions and clinical implications: These data confirm the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in patients with dMMR mCRPC and warrant consideration of reimbursement for anti-PD-(L)1 agents in dMMR mCRPC by health authorities.

抗pd -(L)1免疫疗法治疗DNA错配修复缺陷转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的疗效
背景和目的:高达5%的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者在错配修复基因(dMMR)中存在功能缺失改变,导致微卫星不稳定性(MSI-H)。关于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在dMMR mCRPC中的疗效的数据有限,并且这些药物的报销并不普遍可用。方法:我们进行了一项国际、多中心、回顾性研究,以调查抗pd -(L)1单药治疗dMMR mCRPC的疗效。根据聚合酶链反应分析或下一代测序,dMMR被定义为免疫组化(IHC)中MMR蛋白丢失,和/或MMR基因或MSI-H状态的有害改变。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。主要发现和局限性:2016年7月至2024年7月,93名中位年龄为70岁(46-90岁)的患者开始抗pd -(L)1治疗。根据免疫组化结果(n = 37,40%)、MMR基因的基因组改变(n = 55,59%)和/或MSI-H表型(n = 64,69%)将患者分类为dMMR。在根据实体肿瘤应答评价标准v1.1可评价的患者中,客观应答率为46% (n = 84;95%置信区间[CI] 35-58%)。60%可评估患者的前列腺特异性抗原下降≥50% (n = 68;95% ci 48-72%)。整个队列的中位PFS为7.7个月(95% CI 5.3-12.4), 1年、2年和3年的PFS率分别为39%、27%和26%。中位总生存期为27.0个月(95% CI 17.7-43.5)。两次或多次dMMR检测呈阳性的患者的PFS明显长于仅一次dMMR检测呈阳性的患者。结论和临床意义:这些数据证实了抗pd -(L)1治疗在dMMR mCRPC患者中的有效性,并值得卫生当局考虑dMMR mCRPC中抗pd -(L)1药物的报销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信