A Technical Assessment of a Commercial GFAP Lateral Flow Assay to Establish Proof-of-Concept for Use in Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY
Daniel P Whitehouse, Edward J Needham, Joshua D Bernstock, Edoardo Gaude, Liam Barrett, Soraya Ebrahimi, David K Menon, Virginia F J Newcombe
{"title":"A Technical Assessment of a Commercial GFAP Lateral Flow Assay to Establish Proof-of-Concept for Use in Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Daniel P Whitehouse, Edward J Needham, Joshua D Bernstock, Edoardo Gaude, Liam Barrett, Soraya Ebrahimi, David K Menon, Virginia F J Newcombe","doi":"10.1007/s10571-025-01594-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an emerging biomarker for the detection of acute intracranial pathology following acute brain injuries such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. We undertake a proof-of-concept technical assessment of a commercial lateral flow test (LFT) for the detection of GFAP [the Upfront DX LVOne GFAP lateral flow assay (LFA)], against GFAP concentrations measured using a gold-standard assay [Single Molecule Arrays (Simoa®)-based Human Neurology 4-Plex B assay] in a TBI population. The ability of the LVOne GFAP LFA for identification of samples with GFAP concentrations above the manufacturer's reported lower limit of detection (≥ 0.2 ng/ml) was assessed, with further assessment of the association between the LVOne and a gold-standard assay made using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and linear-mixed-effects modelling. Of the 50 samples, 39 had serum GFAP concentrations exceeding the reported lower limit of detection, with the LVOne GFAP LFA having a 95% (95% CI: 83%, 99%) sensitivity and a 64% (95% CI: 31%, 89%) specificity for detecting a serum GFAP concentrations over this lower limit. There was a significant positive correlation (Rho = 0.94, p < 0.001) between the Quanterix Simoa® GFAP level and the LVOne semiquantitative score, with a significant positive association seen using a linear-mixed-effects model (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the Upfront DX LVOne GFAP LFA is sensitive for the detection of elevated serum GFAP levels, and as such, may be a useful adjunct to the care of patients with acute brain injuries in the pre-hospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9742,"journal":{"name":"Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology","volume":"45 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-025-01594-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an emerging biomarker for the detection of acute intracranial pathology following acute brain injuries such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. We undertake a proof-of-concept technical assessment of a commercial lateral flow test (LFT) for the detection of GFAP [the Upfront DX LVOne GFAP lateral flow assay (LFA)], against GFAP concentrations measured using a gold-standard assay [Single Molecule Arrays (Simoa®)-based Human Neurology 4-Plex B assay] in a TBI population. The ability of the LVOne GFAP LFA for identification of samples with GFAP concentrations above the manufacturer's reported lower limit of detection (≥ 0.2 ng/ml) was assessed, with further assessment of the association between the LVOne and a gold-standard assay made using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and linear-mixed-effects modelling. Of the 50 samples, 39 had serum GFAP concentrations exceeding the reported lower limit of detection, with the LVOne GFAP LFA having a 95% (95% CI: 83%, 99%) sensitivity and a 64% (95% CI: 31%, 89%) specificity for detecting a serum GFAP concentrations over this lower limit. There was a significant positive correlation (Rho = 0.94, p < 0.001) between the Quanterix Simoa® GFAP level and the LVOne semiquantitative score, with a significant positive association seen using a linear-mixed-effects model (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the Upfront DX LVOne GFAP LFA is sensitive for the detection of elevated serum GFAP levels, and as such, may be a useful adjunct to the care of patients with acute brain injuries in the pre-hospital setting.

对商用GFAP侧流测定的技术评估,以建立用于创伤性脑损伤的概念验证。
胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)是一种新兴的生物标志物,用于检测急性脑损伤(如创伤性脑损伤(TBI)、中风和缺氧缺血性脑病)后的急性颅内病理。我们对商用侧流试验(LFT)进行概念验证技术评估,用于检测GFAP [Upfront DX LVOne GFAP侧流试验(LFA)],对比使用金标准试验[基于单分子阵列(Simoa®)的人类神经学4-Plex B试验]在TBI人群中测量的GFAP浓度。评估了LVOne GFAP LFA鉴别GFAP浓度高于制造商报告的检测下限(≥0.2 ng/ml)的样品的能力,并使用Spearman等级相关系数和线性混合效应模型进一步评估了LVOne与金标准分析之间的关联。在50份样本中,39份血清GFAP浓度超过报告的检测下限,LVOne GFAP LFA检测血清GFAP浓度超过该下限的灵敏度为95% (95% CI: 83%, 99%),特异性为64% (95% CI: 31%, 89%)。两者有显著正相关(Rho = 0.94, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology publishes original research concerned with the analysis of neuronal and brain function at the cellular and subcellular levels. The journal offers timely, peer-reviewed articles that describe anatomic, genetic, physiologic, pharmacologic, and biochemical approaches to the study of neuronal function and the analysis of elementary mechanisms. Studies are presented on isolated mammalian tissues and intact animals, with investigations aimed at the molecular mechanisms or neuronal responses at the level of single cells. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology also presents studies of the effects of neurons on other organ systems, such as analysis of the electrical or biochemical response to neurotransmitters or neurohormones on smooth muscle or gland cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信