Extensor mechanism disruption following primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Ashok Rajgopal, Kalpana Aggarwal, Saksham Tripathi
{"title":"Extensor mechanism disruption following primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ashok Rajgopal, Kalpana Aggarwal, Saksham Tripathi","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05991-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extensor mechanism disruption (EMD) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare but debilitating complication, with an incidence ranging from 0.1 to 2.5%. This condition requires surgical management, either by direct repair or reconstruction using various graft options. Existing literature reports inconsistent outcomes and high complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Cochrane database (1990-2024) identified studies on EMD management. Studies of Evidence Levels I-IV with a minimum 6 months follow-up, and clear reporting of interventions for EMD were analysed. Data extraction focused on patient demographics, treatment options, and outcomes such as failure rates, complications, extensor lag, range of motion, and ambulation status. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for non-randomized studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 studies (655 reconstruction cases, 119 repair cases) were included. Reconstruction options using allografts and synthetic mesh showed comparable failure rates (~ 32%). Direct repairs of quadriceps and patellar tendons demonstrated a failure rate of 33.9% and 63% respectively. Autograft reconstruction options reported no failures but were underrepresented. Extensor lag varied across groups, with autografts demonstrating the least extensor lag (5°). Ambulation status improved postoperatively in successful cases. Complications such as periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) were prevalent in failed cases (39-44%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EMD after TKA, managed with reconstruction using allografts or synthetic mesh yielded similar outcomes. Autografts and medial gastrocnemius flaps showed better outcomes in a limited cohort. Larger prospective studies, are needed to address the heterogeneity in outcomes and reporting.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05991-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extensor mechanism disruption (EMD) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare but debilitating complication, with an incidence ranging from 0.1 to 2.5%. This condition requires surgical management, either by direct repair or reconstruction using various graft options. Existing literature reports inconsistent outcomes and high complication rates.

Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Cochrane database (1990-2024) identified studies on EMD management. Studies of Evidence Levels I-IV with a minimum 6 months follow-up, and clear reporting of interventions for EMD were analysed. Data extraction focused on patient demographics, treatment options, and outcomes such as failure rates, complications, extensor lag, range of motion, and ambulation status. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for non-randomized studies.

Results: A total of 32 studies (655 reconstruction cases, 119 repair cases) were included. Reconstruction options using allografts and synthetic mesh showed comparable failure rates (~ 32%). Direct repairs of quadriceps and patellar tendons demonstrated a failure rate of 33.9% and 63% respectively. Autograft reconstruction options reported no failures but were underrepresented. Extensor lag varied across groups, with autografts demonstrating the least extensor lag (5°). Ambulation status improved postoperatively in successful cases. Complications such as periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) were prevalent in failed cases (39-44%).

Conclusion: EMD after TKA, managed with reconstruction using allografts or synthetic mesh yielded similar outcomes. Autografts and medial gastrocnemius flaps showed better outcomes in a limited cohort. Larger prospective studies, are needed to address the heterogeneity in outcomes and reporting.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

初次和翻修全膝关节置换术后伸肌机制破坏:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)后伸肌机制断裂(EMD)是一种罕见但使人衰弱的并发症,发生率为0.1%至2.5%。这种情况需要手术治疗,通过直接修复或使用各种移植选择重建。现有文献报道了不一致的结果和高并发症发生率。方法:综合检索MEDLINE和Cochrane数据库(1990-2024),确定EMD管理的研究。对证据等级I-IV的研究进行了至少6个月的随访,并对EMD干预措施的明确报告进行了分析。数据提取的重点是患者人口统计学、治疗方案和结果,如失败率、并发症、伸肌滞后、活动范围和行走状态。质量评估采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)非随机研究检查表进行。结果:共纳入32例研究,其中重建655例,修复119例。同种异体移植和合成补片重建的失败率相当(~ 32%)。直接修复股四头肌和髌骨肌腱的失败率分别为33.9%和63%。自体移植物重建方案报告没有失败,但代表性不足。伸肌滞后在各组间有所不同,自体移植物的伸肌滞后最小(5°)。成功病例术后活动状况改善。并发症如假体周围关节感染(PJI)在失败病例中普遍存在(39-44%)。结论:TKA术后EMD与同种异体移植物或合成补片重建效果相似。自体移植物和内侧腓肠肌皮瓣在有限的队列中显示出更好的结果。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来解决结果和报告的异质性。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信