Paraplegia events and follow-up results after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Zhenchun Ji, Chengkai Su, Biwen Yang, Yunsheng Yu, Wenxue Ye, Yihuan Chen, Haoyue Huang, Zhenya Shen
{"title":"Paraplegia events and follow-up results after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.","authors":"Zhenchun Ji, Chengkai Su, Biwen Yang, Yunsheng Yu, Wenxue Ye, Yihuan Chen, Haoyue Huang, Zhenya Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.06.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively investigate the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and prognosis of paraplegia complications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 420 patients with Stanford type B acute aortic dissection who underwent TEVAR between December 2015 and December 2020 were divided into a non-paraplegic (403 patients) or paraplegic group (17 patients) according to the presence or absence of paraplegia. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for paraplegia. The patients were followed up for a median of 38 months (interquartile range[IQR]: 24-50 months), and the clinical outcomes of the patients in the two groups were assessed. The primary endpoint was death from any cause. The Kaplan-Meier estimation was applied to determine the time to the primary endpoint, while the log-rank test was employed to compare group survival rates. Additionally, Cox regression analysis was used to detect the factors influencing the survival rate of the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall incidence of paraplegia after TEVAR was 4.05% (17/420 patients). The paraplegic and non-paraplegic groups were significantly different in terms of hypertension, false lumen thrombosis, perioperative hypotension, distance from the stent end to the ostia of celiac axis, and the rate of distal true lumen stenosis (p < 0.1). One-way logistic regression analysis of these factors showed that hypertension, false lumen thrombosis,perioperative hypotension, distance from the stent end to the ostia of celiac axis, and the rate of distal true lumen stenosis were significant risk factors for paraplegia (p < 0.1). Further, multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant differences in perioperative hypotension, distance from the stent end to the ostia of celiac axis, and the rate of distal true lumen stenosis (P < 0.01). The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed significant differences in all-cause mortality between the paraplegic and non-paraplegic groups (hazard ratio [HR], 11.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.58-51.76; P = 0.00). Moreover, Cox regression analysis indicated that paraplegia was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality after TEVAR (HR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.20-7.79; P= 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall incidence of concomitant paraplegia after TEVAR was 4.05%. Perioperative hypotension, distance from the stent end to the ostia of celiac axis, and the rate of distal true lumen stenosis were independent risk factors for the postoperative occurrence of paraplegia. During a median follow-up of 38 months, a significant difference in survival rate was found between the patients in the paraplegic and non-paraplegic groups. Furthermore, paraplegia was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in patients after endovascular aortic repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.06.039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively investigate the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and prognosis of paraplegia complications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Methods: A total of 420 patients with Stanford type B acute aortic dissection who underwent TEVAR between December 2015 and December 2020 were divided into a non-paraplegic (403 patients) or paraplegic group (17 patients) according to the presence or absence of paraplegia. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for paraplegia. The patients were followed up for a median of 38 months (interquartile range[IQR]: 24-50 months), and the clinical outcomes of the patients in the two groups were assessed. The primary endpoint was death from any cause. The Kaplan-Meier estimation was applied to determine the time to the primary endpoint, while the log-rank test was employed to compare group survival rates. Additionally, Cox regression analysis was used to detect the factors influencing the survival rate of the two groups.

Results: The overall incidence of paraplegia after TEVAR was 4.05% (17/420 patients). The paraplegic and non-paraplegic groups were significantly different in terms of hypertension, false lumen thrombosis, perioperative hypotension, distance from the stent end to the ostia of celiac axis, and the rate of distal true lumen stenosis (p < 0.1). One-way logistic regression analysis of these factors showed that hypertension, false lumen thrombosis,perioperative hypotension, distance from the stent end to the ostia of celiac axis, and the rate of distal true lumen stenosis were significant risk factors for paraplegia (p < 0.1). Further, multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant differences in perioperative hypotension, distance from the stent end to the ostia of celiac axis, and the rate of distal true lumen stenosis (P < 0.01). The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed significant differences in all-cause mortality between the paraplegic and non-paraplegic groups (hazard ratio [HR], 11.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.58-51.76; P = 0.00). Moreover, Cox regression analysis indicated that paraplegia was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality after TEVAR (HR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.20-7.79; P= 0.01).

Conclusion: The overall incidence of concomitant paraplegia after TEVAR was 4.05%. Perioperative hypotension, distance from the stent end to the ostia of celiac axis, and the rate of distal true lumen stenosis were independent risk factors for the postoperative occurrence of paraplegia. During a median follow-up of 38 months, a significant difference in survival rate was found between the patients in the paraplegic and non-paraplegic groups. Furthermore, paraplegia was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in patients after endovascular aortic repair.

胸血管内主动脉修复术后截瘫事件及随访结果。
目的:回顾性分析胸血管内主动脉修复术(TEVAR)后截瘫并发症的临床特点、危险因素及预后。方法:选取2015年12月至2020年12月接受TEVAR治疗的420例Stanford B型急性主动脉夹层患者,根据是否存在截瘫分为非截瘫组(403例)和截瘫组(17例)。采用Logistic回归分析确定截瘫的危险因素。随访时间中位数为38个月(四分位数间距[IQR]: 24-50个月),评估两组患者的临床结局。主要终点是任何原因导致的死亡。Kaplan-Meier估计用于确定到达主要终点的时间,log-rank检验用于比较组生存率。并采用Cox回归分析检测两组患者生存率的影响因素。结果:TEVAR术后截瘫总发生率为4.05%(17/420)。截瘫组与非截瘫组在高血压、假腔血栓形成、围手术期低血压、支架端至腹腔轴口距离、远端真腔狭窄发生率方面差异有统计学意义(p < 0.1)。单因素logistic回归分析显示,高血压、假腔血栓形成、围手术期低血压、支架端到腹腔轴口距离、远端真腔狭窄率是截瘫发生的重要危险因素(p < 0.1)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,两组患者围手术期低血压、支架端到腹腔轴口距离、远端真腔狭窄率差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,截瘫组和非截瘫组的全因死亡率存在显著差异(风险比[HR], 11.57;95%置信区间[CI], 2.58-51.76;P = 0.00)。此外,Cox回归分析显示,截瘫是TEVAR术后全因死亡率的独立危险因素(HR, 3.05;95% ci, 1.20-7.79;P = 0.01)。结论:TEVAR术后并发截瘫的总发生率为4.05%。围手术期低血压、支架端到腹腔轴口的距离、远端真腔狭窄率是术后发生截瘫的独立危险因素。在中位随访38个月期间,截瘫组和非截瘫组患者的生存率有显著差异。此外,截瘫是血管内主动脉修复术后患者全因死亡率的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信