Impact of fish farm drainage water reuse for irrigation on barley yield and water productivity: Field study and simulation using the SALTMED model

IF 1.7 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Somya Said Ahmed, Hoda Kamal Soussa, Nagy Ali Ali Hassan, Ramadan Eid Abdelraouf, Gehan Sallam, Ragab Ragab
{"title":"Impact of fish farm drainage water reuse for irrigation on barley yield and water productivity: Field study and simulation using the SALTMED model","authors":"Somya Said Ahmed,&nbsp;Hoda Kamal Soussa,&nbsp;Nagy Ali Ali Hassan,&nbsp;Ramadan Eid Abdelraouf,&nbsp;Gehan Sallam,&nbsp;Ragab Ragab","doi":"10.1002/ird.3069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Countries such as Egypt, which are situated in semi-arid regions and have water constraints, primarily aim to repurpose unconventional water resources for irrigation. The aim of this research was to examine the feasibility and advantages of irrigating barley with fish farm drainage water (DWFF) rather than fresh irrigation water (IW). Four degrees of deficit irrigation [100% FI (full irrigation), 80% FI, 60% FI and 40% FI] were studied for the irrigation of barley via two types of water (DWFF and IW). The response of crops to a deficit irrigation approach involving the use of IW in the two seasons of 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 was demonstrated by the results. The yield of the barley produced with DWFF irrigation was greater than that produced with IW irrigation, ranging from 9% to 12% in 2020–2021 and from 9% to 13% in 2021–2022. This resulted from the higher concentration of dissolved biological nitrogen and other nutrients in DWFFs. There was a strong correlation between the observed and simulated crop yield values for both growing seasons, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values of 0.963 and 0.960, respectively, for all the treatments. The SALTMED model was used to simulate the soil moisture content, water application efficiency, barley dry matter, yield and water productivity for all the treatments. The study concluded that DWFF is a useful irrigation substitute for IW. Higher yields were also attained with the use of less IW and chemical fertilisers because of the DWFF. In addition, there are other advantages, such as increasing farmer income and lowering discharge to the drainage network.</p>","PeriodicalId":14848,"journal":{"name":"Irrigation and Drainage","volume":"74 3","pages":"1031-1050"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irrigation and Drainage","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird.3069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Countries such as Egypt, which are situated in semi-arid regions and have water constraints, primarily aim to repurpose unconventional water resources for irrigation. The aim of this research was to examine the feasibility and advantages of irrigating barley with fish farm drainage water (DWFF) rather than fresh irrigation water (IW). Four degrees of deficit irrigation [100% FI (full irrigation), 80% FI, 60% FI and 40% FI] were studied for the irrigation of barley via two types of water (DWFF and IW). The response of crops to a deficit irrigation approach involving the use of IW in the two seasons of 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 was demonstrated by the results. The yield of the barley produced with DWFF irrigation was greater than that produced with IW irrigation, ranging from 9% to 12% in 2020–2021 and from 9% to 13% in 2021–2022. This resulted from the higher concentration of dissolved biological nitrogen and other nutrients in DWFFs. There was a strong correlation between the observed and simulated crop yield values for both growing seasons, with R2 values of 0.963 and 0.960, respectively, for all the treatments. The SALTMED model was used to simulate the soil moisture content, water application efficiency, barley dry matter, yield and water productivity for all the treatments. The study concluded that DWFF is a useful irrigation substitute for IW. Higher yields were also attained with the use of less IW and chemical fertilisers because of the DWFF. In addition, there are other advantages, such as increasing farmer income and lowering discharge to the drainage network.

养鱼场排水回用灌溉对大麦产量和水分生产力的影响:使用SALTMED模型的实地研究和模拟
埃及等国家位于半干旱地区,水资源紧张,其主要目标是将非常规水资源重新用于灌溉。本研究的目的是探讨用养鱼场排水(DWFF)代替新鲜灌溉水(IW)灌溉大麦的可行性和优势。采用DWFF和IW两种水灌溉大麦,研究了4种亏缺灌溉程度[100% FI(充分灌溉)、80% FI、60% FI和40% FI]。结果表明,在2020-2021年和2021-2022年两个季节,作物对使用IW的亏缺灌溉方法的反应。DWFF灌溉的大麦产量高于IW灌溉,2020-2021年为9% ~ 12%,2021-2022年为9% ~ 13%。这是由于水体中溶解的生物氮和其他营养物浓度较高所致。两个生长季节的作物实测值与模拟产量之间存在较强的相关性,各处理的R2分别为0.963和0.960。采用SALTMED模型模拟各处理的土壤含水量、水分利用效率、大麦干物质、产量和水分生产力。研究结果表明,灌溉水是一种有效的灌溉方式。由于DWFF,使用较少的水肥和化肥也获得了较高的产量。此外,还有其他优点,如增加农民收入和减少排水网的排放量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irrigation and Drainage
Irrigation and Drainage 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
107
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Human intervention in the control of water for sustainable agricultural development involves the application of technology and management approaches to: (i) provide the appropriate quantities of water when it is needed by the crops, (ii) prevent salinisation and water-logging of the root zone, (iii) protect land from flooding, and (iv) maximise the beneficial use of water by appropriate allocation, conservation and reuse. All this has to be achieved within a framework of economic, social and environmental constraints. The Journal, therefore, covers a wide range of subjects, advancement in which, through high quality papers in the Journal, will make a significant contribution to the enormous task of satisfying the needs of the world’s ever-increasing population. The Journal also publishes book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信