{"title":"Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: A Perspective From Critical Appraisal of the Guidelines","authors":"Peng Wang, Jing Zhang, Tong Liu, Yangsheng He, Menghui Liu, Xinxue Liao, Xiaodong Zhuang, Li Feng","doi":"10.1111/jep.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Current guidelines involving screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) have some discrepancies in the recommendations for AF screening, which might confuse clinicians. Therefore, it is necessary to appraise the quality of the guidelines and summarize the consensus and discrepancies regarding AF screening.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search was conducted for guidelines containing recommendations for AF screening between 2012 and 2024. Two reviewers appraised the quality of the included guidelines with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seven guidelines met the inclusion criteria, with AGREE II scores ranging from 42% to 80%, of which 4 guidelines were defined as ‘strongly recommended’ guidelines. Most current guidelines reach consensus that AF screening should be performed in individuals aged ≥ 65 years and patients with stroke or cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). However, there was no consensus on whether to perform systematic ECG screening in patients ≥ 75 years of age and the optimal method of prolonged ECG monitoring in patients with stroke. Moreover, the recommendation regarding AF screening in other subgroups was limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The guidelines from European and American regions had higher AGREE II scores. Most of the current guidelines reached consensus that the elderly population (≥ 65 years) and patients with stroke or CIED need AF screening, but there was no consensus on the methods or intensity of screening for specific subgroups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Current guidelines involving screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) have some discrepancies in the recommendations for AF screening, which might confuse clinicians. Therefore, it is necessary to appraise the quality of the guidelines and summarize the consensus and discrepancies regarding AF screening.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted for guidelines containing recommendations for AF screening between 2012 and 2024. Two reviewers appraised the quality of the included guidelines with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument.
Results
Seven guidelines met the inclusion criteria, with AGREE II scores ranging from 42% to 80%, of which 4 guidelines were defined as ‘strongly recommended’ guidelines. Most current guidelines reach consensus that AF screening should be performed in individuals aged ≥ 65 years and patients with stroke or cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). However, there was no consensus on whether to perform systematic ECG screening in patients ≥ 75 years of age and the optimal method of prolonged ECG monitoring in patients with stroke. Moreover, the recommendation regarding AF screening in other subgroups was limited.
Conclusion
The guidelines from European and American regions had higher AGREE II scores. Most of the current guidelines reached consensus that the elderly population (≥ 65 years) and patients with stroke or CIED need AF screening, but there was no consensus on the methods or intensity of screening for specific subgroups.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.