Hang Qi PhD , Lei Hu PhD , Sheng Huang PhD , Yen-Po Lee MS , Qing Chen MS , Francis Yu MS , Huifang Zhai MS , Yunjie Yang PhD , Minglei Kang PhD , Peter Park CMD , Andy Shim CMD , Xiaoxuan Xu PhD , David H. Abramson MD , Jasmine H. Francis MD , Arpit Chhabra MD , Charles B. Simone II, MD , Christopher A. Barker MD , Haibo Lin PhD
{"title":"Proton Therapy for Uveal Melanoma on a Pencil Beam Scanning Gantry","authors":"Hang Qi PhD , Lei Hu PhD , Sheng Huang PhD , Yen-Po Lee MS , Qing Chen MS , Francis Yu MS , Huifang Zhai MS , Yunjie Yang PhD , Minglei Kang PhD , Peter Park CMD , Andy Shim CMD , Xiaoxuan Xu PhD , David H. Abramson MD , Jasmine H. Francis MD , Arpit Chhabra MD , Charles B. Simone II, MD , Christopher A. Barker MD , Haibo Lin PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We present our experience treating ocular tumors in a standard pencil beam scanning (PBS) gantry room without apertures, which could broaden access to proton therapy for patients with ocular cancer globally. Besides, this study explores the dosimetric benefits of beam-specific apertures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>We retrospectively evaluated 11 consecutive patients with uveal melanoma treated in a clinic gantry room. The dose deviations between the planned and received by the patient were investigated by assessing the forward calculation of the treatment plan on the synthetic computed tomography of cone beam computed tomography. Each plan was forward calculated with a beam-specific brass aperture (BSA) using a Monte Carlo algorithm to explore dosimetric improvements. We compared the plan quality to the delivered plan (DP) using target coverage (D95%) and mean/maximum doses to the adjacent organs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A close agreement between the planned and delivered dose was achieved, with D95% deviations within 3.6% for all treatments, maintaining dose constraints for critical organs. Similar target coverage was reached, with D95% at 101% ± 1.0% (DP) and 101% ± 3.2% (BSA). BSA was effective (<em>P</em> < .05) in reducing the mean [<em>D</em><sub>Mean</sub> (DP, BSA)Gy] and maximum [<em>D</em><sub>Max</sub> (DP, BSA)Gy] dose to organs: retina <em>D</em><sub>Mean</sub> (37.7, 29.5), cornea <em>D</em><sub>Mean</sub> (10.7, 2.4), conjunctiva <em>D</em><sub>Mean</sub> (13.6, 4.1), lacrimal gland <em>D</em><sub>Mean</sub> (25.5, 14.1), optic nerve <em>D</em><sub>Mean</sub> (19.6, 13.1), lens <em>D</em><sub>Max</sub> (22.4, 8.5), cornea <em>D</em><sub>Max</sub> (24.4, 10.2), eyebrow <em>D</em><sub>Max</sub> (15.3, 6.8). BSA lowered the mean dose to surrounding organs and significantly decreased the maximum dose to nonabutting organs (lens, cornea, eyebrow), but had little impact on the maximum dose to the abutting organs (retina, optic nerve).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We demonstrate the successful implementation of ocular proton treatment with a standard PBS gantry beamline without apertures. The beam-specific apertures effectively reduced doses to the organs adjacent to the target in the PBS proton treatment while maintaining similar target coverage. This approach offers an opportunity to expand access to ocular proton therapy widely.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 8","pages":"Article 101782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
We present our experience treating ocular tumors in a standard pencil beam scanning (PBS) gantry room without apertures, which could broaden access to proton therapy for patients with ocular cancer globally. Besides, this study explores the dosimetric benefits of beam-specific apertures.
Methods and Materials
We retrospectively evaluated 11 consecutive patients with uveal melanoma treated in a clinic gantry room. The dose deviations between the planned and received by the patient were investigated by assessing the forward calculation of the treatment plan on the synthetic computed tomography of cone beam computed tomography. Each plan was forward calculated with a beam-specific brass aperture (BSA) using a Monte Carlo algorithm to explore dosimetric improvements. We compared the plan quality to the delivered plan (DP) using target coverage (D95%) and mean/maximum doses to the adjacent organs.
Results
A close agreement between the planned and delivered dose was achieved, with D95% deviations within 3.6% for all treatments, maintaining dose constraints for critical organs. Similar target coverage was reached, with D95% at 101% ± 1.0% (DP) and 101% ± 3.2% (BSA). BSA was effective (P < .05) in reducing the mean [DMean (DP, BSA)Gy] and maximum [DMax (DP, BSA)Gy] dose to organs: retina DMean (37.7, 29.5), cornea DMean (10.7, 2.4), conjunctiva DMean (13.6, 4.1), lacrimal gland DMean (25.5, 14.1), optic nerve DMean (19.6, 13.1), lens DMax (22.4, 8.5), cornea DMax (24.4, 10.2), eyebrow DMax (15.3, 6.8). BSA lowered the mean dose to surrounding organs and significantly decreased the maximum dose to nonabutting organs (lens, cornea, eyebrow), but had little impact on the maximum dose to the abutting organs (retina, optic nerve).
Conclusions
We demonstrate the successful implementation of ocular proton treatment with a standard PBS gantry beamline without apertures. The beam-specific apertures effectively reduced doses to the organs adjacent to the target in the PBS proton treatment while maintaining similar target coverage. This approach offers an opportunity to expand access to ocular proton therapy widely.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.