Regulatory Insights From 27 Years of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning-Enabled Medical Device Recalls in the United States: Implications for Future Governance.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Wei-Pin Chen, Wei-Guang Teng, C Benson Kuo, Yu-Jui Yen, Jian-Yu Lian, Matthew Sing, Peng-Ting Chen
{"title":"Regulatory Insights From 27 Years of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning-Enabled Medical Device Recalls in the United States: Implications for Future Governance.","authors":"Wei-Pin Chen, Wei-Guang Teng, C Benson Kuo, Yu-Jui Yen, Jian-Yu Lian, Matthew Sing, Peng-Ting Chen","doi":"10.2196/67552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) has revolutionized the health care industry, particularly in the development and use of medical devices. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized over 878 AI/ML-enabled medical devices, reflecting a growing trend in both quantity and application scope. Understanding the distinct challenges these devices present in terms of FDA regulation violations is crucial for effectively avoiding recalls. This is particularly pertinent for proactive measures regarding medical devices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores the impact of AI/ML on medical device recalls, focusing on the distinct causes associated with AI/ML-enabled devices compared with other device types. Recall information associated with 510(k)-cleared devices was obtained from openFDA. Three recall cohorts were established: \"All 510(k) devices recall,\" \"software-related devices recall,\" and \"AI/ML devices recall.\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recall information for 510(k)-cleared devices was obtained from openFDA. AI/ML-enabled medical devices were identified based on FDA listings. Three cohorts were established: \"All 510(k) devices recall,\" \"software-related devices recall,\" and \"AI/ML devices recall.\" Root cause analysis was conducted for each recall event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that while the top 5 recall root causes are relatively similar across the 3 control groups, the proportions vary, with AI/ML devices showing a higher impact for 87% of all recalls. Design and development-related factors play a significant role in recalls of AI/ML devices with root causes related to device design and software design accounting for 50% of recalls, emphasizing the importance of thorough planning, user feedback incorporation, and validation during the development process to reduce the probability of recalls. In addition, changes in software, including design changes and control changes, also contribute substantially to recalls in AI/ML devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the unique challenges and considerations associated with AI/ML-enabled medical device recalls, offering guidance for manufacturers to enhance verification plans and mitigate risks in this rapidly evolving technological landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"13 ","pages":"e67552"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) has revolutionized the health care industry, particularly in the development and use of medical devices. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized over 878 AI/ML-enabled medical devices, reflecting a growing trend in both quantity and application scope. Understanding the distinct challenges these devices present in terms of FDA regulation violations is crucial for effectively avoiding recalls. This is particularly pertinent for proactive measures regarding medical devices.

Objective: This study explores the impact of AI/ML on medical device recalls, focusing on the distinct causes associated with AI/ML-enabled devices compared with other device types. Recall information associated with 510(k)-cleared devices was obtained from openFDA. Three recall cohorts were established: "All 510(k) devices recall," "software-related devices recall," and "AI/ML devices recall."

Methods: Recall information for 510(k)-cleared devices was obtained from openFDA. AI/ML-enabled medical devices were identified based on FDA listings. Three cohorts were established: "All 510(k) devices recall," "software-related devices recall," and "AI/ML devices recall." Root cause analysis was conducted for each recall event.

Results: The results indicate that while the top 5 recall root causes are relatively similar across the 3 control groups, the proportions vary, with AI/ML devices showing a higher impact for 87% of all recalls. Design and development-related factors play a significant role in recalls of AI/ML devices with root causes related to device design and software design accounting for 50% of recalls, emphasizing the importance of thorough planning, user feedback incorporation, and validation during the development process to reduce the probability of recalls. In addition, changes in software, including design changes and control changes, also contribute substantially to recalls in AI/ML devices.

Conclusions: In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the unique challenges and considerations associated with AI/ML-enabled medical device recalls, offering guidance for manufacturers to enhance verification plans and mitigate risks in this rapidly evolving technological landscape.

美国27年人工智能/机器学习医疗器械召回的监管见解:对未来治理的影响。
背景:人工智能/机器学习(AI/ML)已经彻底改变了医疗保健行业,特别是在医疗设备的开发和使用方面。美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)已批准超过878台支持AI/ ml的医疗设备,反映出数量和应用范围都在增长的趋势。了解这些设备在违反FDA法规方面存在的独特挑战对于有效避免召回至关重要。这对于医疗设备的主动措施尤为重要。目的:本研究探讨人工智能/机器学习对医疗器械召回的影响,重点研究与其他设备类型相比,启用人工智能/机器学习的设备相关的独特原因。与510(k)清除器械相关的召回信息来自openFDA。建立了三个召回队列:“所有510(k)设备召回”,“软件相关设备召回”和“人工智能/机器学习设备召回”。方法:从openFDA获得510(k)清除器械的召回信息。基于FDA清单确定了支持AI/ ml的医疗设备。建立了三个队列:“所有510(k)设备召回”,“软件相关设备召回”和“人工智能/机器学习设备召回”。对每个召回事件进行根本原因分析。结果:结果表明,虽然前5个召回根本原因在3个对照组中相对相似,但比例不同,AI/ML设备对所有召回的影响更高,占87%。设计和开发相关因素在AI/ML设备召回中起着重要作用,其中与设备设计和软件设计相关的根本原因占召回的50%,强调了在开发过程中进行彻底规划,结合用户反馈和验证以降低召回概率的重要性。此外,软件的变化,包括设计变化和控制变化,也对人工智能/机器学习设备的召回做出了重大贡献。结论:总之,本研究提供了与AI/ ml支持的医疗器械召回相关的独特挑战和考虑因素的有价值的见解,为制造商在快速发展的技术环境中加强验证计划和降低风险提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信