Exposure-response analysis of recent epidemiological data: Proposed risk based occupational exposure limits for various mineral types of asbestos

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Michael E. Stevens , Dennis J. Paustenbach , Andrey Korchevskiy
{"title":"Exposure-response analysis of recent epidemiological data: Proposed risk based occupational exposure limits for various mineral types of asbestos","authors":"Michael E. Stevens ,&nbsp;Dennis J. Paustenbach ,&nbsp;Andrey Korchevskiy","doi":"10.1016/j.cbi.2025.111645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the last few decades, numerous studies have investigated the incidence of mesothelioma among asbestos-exposed populations. Despite significant differences in the potency of various asbestos fiber types to cause mesothelioma, fiber-specific occupational exposure limits (OELs) based on these data are not available. This paper uses results from 14 epidemiological studies to model the exposure-response for fibers, estimate benchmark doses, and propose fiber-specific OELs. Extrapolation of these benchmark doses suggests that the cumulative lifetime exposure (i.e., dose) that corresponds to a theoretical 1 in 1000 risk of mesothelioma death (pleural and peritoneal combined) were approximately 0.3, 2, 10, and 100 f/cc-years for crocidolite, amosite, textile chrysotile, and non-textile chrysotile fibers, respectively. While the proposed estimates are expected to overpredict the risk, they can serve as conservative values to protect the health of workers potentially exposed to commercial asbestos. From this, we propose occupational exposure limits of 0.01, 0.05, 0.2, and 2 f/cc for each mineral type (crocidolite, amosite, textile chrysotile, and non-textile chrysotile fibers), respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first proposal for separate occupational exposure limits based on the epidemiology of each mineral type of fibers since the ACGIH made such a proposal in 1978.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":274,"journal":{"name":"Chemico-Biological Interactions","volume":"419 ","pages":"Article 111645"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemico-Biological Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009279725002753","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the last few decades, numerous studies have investigated the incidence of mesothelioma among asbestos-exposed populations. Despite significant differences in the potency of various asbestos fiber types to cause mesothelioma, fiber-specific occupational exposure limits (OELs) based on these data are not available. This paper uses results from 14 epidemiological studies to model the exposure-response for fibers, estimate benchmark doses, and propose fiber-specific OELs. Extrapolation of these benchmark doses suggests that the cumulative lifetime exposure (i.e., dose) that corresponds to a theoretical 1 in 1000 risk of mesothelioma death (pleural and peritoneal combined) were approximately 0.3, 2, 10, and 100 f/cc-years for crocidolite, amosite, textile chrysotile, and non-textile chrysotile fibers, respectively. While the proposed estimates are expected to overpredict the risk, they can serve as conservative values to protect the health of workers potentially exposed to commercial asbestos. From this, we propose occupational exposure limits of 0.01, 0.05, 0.2, and 2 f/cc for each mineral type (crocidolite, amosite, textile chrysotile, and non-textile chrysotile fibers), respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first proposal for separate occupational exposure limits based on the epidemiology of each mineral type of fibers since the ACGIH made such a proposal in 1978.
最近流行病学数据的暴露-反应分析:建议的基于风险的各种矿物类型石棉职业暴露限值。
在过去的几十年里,许多研究调查了石棉接触人群中间皮瘤的发病率。尽管不同类型的石棉纤维引起间皮瘤的效力存在显著差异,但基于这些数据的纤维特定职业暴露限值(OELs)尚未得到。本文利用14项流行病学研究的结果来模拟纤维的暴露反应,估计基准剂量,并提出纤维特异性oel。这些基准剂量的外推表明,相对于理论1 / 1000间皮瘤死亡风险(胸膜和腹膜合并)的累积寿命暴露(即剂量),对膨绿石、蠕变石、纺织温石棉和非纺织温石棉纤维分别约为0.3、2、10和100 f/c -年。虽然拟议的估计可能会高估风险,但它们可以作为保守的价值,以确保可能接触商业石棉的工人的健康。据此,我们建议每种矿物类型(青橄榄石、亚铁石、纺织温石棉和非纺织温石棉纤维)的职业暴露限值分别为0.01、0.05、0.2和2 f/cc。据我们所知,这是自1978年ACGIH提出建议以来,第一次根据每种矿物纤维的流行病学情况提出单独的职业暴露限值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
410
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Chemico-Biological Interactions publishes research reports and review articles that examine the molecular, cellular, and/or biochemical basis of toxicologically relevant outcomes. Special emphasis is placed on toxicological mechanisms associated with interactions between chemicals and biological systems. Outcomes may include all traditional endpoints caused by synthetic or naturally occurring chemicals, both in vivo and in vitro. Endpoints of interest include, but are not limited to carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, respiratory toxicology, neurotoxicology, reproductive and developmental toxicology, and immunotoxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信