[Different expectations regarding the prehospital care of injured children? : A comparison between pediatric surgeons and trauma surgeons].

Ralf Kraus, Melanie Markmann, Jens Günter Riedel, Emmanuel Schneck
{"title":"[Different expectations regarding the prehospital care of injured children? : A comparison between pediatric surgeons and trauma surgeons].","authors":"Ralf Kraus, Melanie Markmann, Jens Günter Riedel, Emmanuel Schneck","doi":"10.1007/s00104-025-02352-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prehospital care of injured children is challenging. Immobilization and pharmacological pain management are in the foreground; however, the expectations of pediatric surgeons and trauma surgeons regarding emergency medical services and emergency physicians can vary. This study aims to identify similarities and differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study 186 members of the Pediatric Traumatology Section of the German Society for Trauma Surgery were surveyed on the necessity of 9 emergency medical interventions using 10 routine case studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 pediatric surgeons and 31 trauma surgeons provided their assessments. There were significant differences in assessment regarding the use of pharmacological pain management, the need for neurological assessment and reduction maneuvers with analgesia. There was high agreement regarding immobilization of the injured body region, the establishment of an intravenous approach and sterile closure of open fractures.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Pediatric traumatologists with trauma surgery and pediatric surgery training have different priorities in their requirements for the prehospital care of injured children. Joint interdisciplinary recommendations for action should be formulated to provide widely accepted guidelines for emergency medical personnel, who often do not specialize in pediatric traumatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":72588,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-025-02352-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The prehospital care of injured children is challenging. Immobilization and pharmacological pain management are in the foreground; however, the expectations of pediatric surgeons and trauma surgeons regarding emergency medical services and emergency physicians can vary. This study aims to identify similarities and differences.

Methods: In this study 186 members of the Pediatric Traumatology Section of the German Society for Trauma Surgery were surveyed on the necessity of 9 emergency medical interventions using 10 routine case studies.

Results: A total of 26 pediatric surgeons and 31 trauma surgeons provided their assessments. There were significant differences in assessment regarding the use of pharmacological pain management, the need for neurological assessment and reduction maneuvers with analgesia. There was high agreement regarding immobilization of the injured body region, the establishment of an intravenous approach and sterile closure of open fractures.

Discussion: Pediatric traumatologists with trauma surgery and pediatric surgery training have different priorities in their requirements for the prehospital care of injured children. Joint interdisciplinary recommendations for action should be formulated to provide widely accepted guidelines for emergency medical personnel, who often do not specialize in pediatric traumatology.

对受伤儿童院前护理的不同期望?[儿科外科与创伤外科的比较]。
引言:受伤儿童的院前护理具有挑战性。固定化和药物疼痛管理是前景;然而,儿科外科医生和创伤外科医生对急诊医疗服务和急诊医生的期望是不同的。本研究旨在找出异同点。方法:采用10例常规病例,对德国创伤外科学会儿童创伤科186名成员进行9项紧急医疗干预的必要性调查。结果:共有26名儿科外科医生和31名创伤外科医生提供了他们的评估。在使用药物疼痛管理,需要神经学评估和镇痛复位操作方面的评估有显著差异。对于受伤部位的固定,静脉入路的建立和开放性骨折的无菌闭合,有很高的一致性。讨论:受过创伤外科和儿科外科培训的儿科创伤医师对受伤儿童院前护理的要求优先级不同。应制定跨学科联合行动建议,为通常不擅长儿科创伤学的急救医务人员提供广泛接受的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信