Savings Associated With Bundled Payments for Outpatient Spine Surgery Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Austin S Kilaru, Grace Y Ng, Erkuan Wang, Erin Huang, Aidan P Crowley, Jingsan Zhu, Joshua M Liao, Said Ibrahim, Torrey Shirk, Deborah S Cousins, Neil R Malhotra, Amol S Navathe
{"title":"Savings Associated With Bundled Payments for Outpatient Spine Surgery Among Medicare Beneficiaries.","authors":"Austin S Kilaru, Grace Y Ng, Erkuan Wang, Erin Huang, Aidan P Crowley, Jingsan Zhu, Joshua M Liao, Said Ibrahim, Torrey Shirk, Deborah S Cousins, Neil R Malhotra, Amol S Navathe","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Few value-based payment programs have targeted outpatient surgery, although these procedures comprise most surgeries performed in hospitals. In 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services introduced Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI Advanced), the first episode-based payment model to include an outpatient surgical condition-spine surgery. It is not known whether bundled payments reduce spending or improve quality for outpatient surgery, despite plans to expand outpatient episodes in future models.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether hospital participation in the first year of BPCI Advanced for outpatient and inpatient spine surgery (back and neck except spinal fusion procedures [BNESF]) was associated with changes in spending and quality.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims and differences-in-differences analysis adjusting for patient and market characteristics was conducted comparing outcomes for patients receiving outpatient and inpatient BNESF from hospitals that participated in BPCI Advanced vs those receiving these procedures from a matched comparison group of nonparticipating hospitals. Medicare beneficiaries receiving outpatient and inpatient BNESF between 2013 and 2019 were included. Analyses were conducted between March 2023 and February 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Hospital participation in BPCI Advanced.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was total episode spending, including spending incurred for the index procedure and 90-day follow-up period. Secondary outcomes included 90-day return inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14 280 patients who received outpatient BNESF, hospital participation in BPCI Advanced was associated with a differential reduction in total episode spending (-$1201; 95% CI, -2184 to -219) and return inpatient admissions (-2.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.2 to -0.1). For outpatient procedures, the mean (SD) age was 71.8 (8.6) years; 43.9% were women, 3.9% were Black; and 3.2% were Hispanic. Among 23 440 patients who received inpatient BNESF, hospital participation in BPCI Advanced was not associated with differential changes in total episode spending or return inpatient admissions. There were no significant changes for emergency department visits or mortality for either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relavance: </strong>In this cohort study, participation in the first year of a bundled payment program for outpatient spine surgery was associated with nearly 10% lower spending. No changes in spending were observed for similar inpatient spine surgery procedures. Further evaluation of bundled payments for outpatient surgical conditions and associated changes in care delivery is needed to inform plans to include these episodes in future models.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 7","pages":"e251907"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Few value-based payment programs have targeted outpatient surgery, although these procedures comprise most surgeries performed in hospitals. In 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services introduced Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI Advanced), the first episode-based payment model to include an outpatient surgical condition-spine surgery. It is not known whether bundled payments reduce spending or improve quality for outpatient surgery, despite plans to expand outpatient episodes in future models.

Objective: To determine whether hospital participation in the first year of BPCI Advanced for outpatient and inpatient spine surgery (back and neck except spinal fusion procedures [BNESF]) was associated with changes in spending and quality.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims and differences-in-differences analysis adjusting for patient and market characteristics was conducted comparing outcomes for patients receiving outpatient and inpatient BNESF from hospitals that participated in BPCI Advanced vs those receiving these procedures from a matched comparison group of nonparticipating hospitals. Medicare beneficiaries receiving outpatient and inpatient BNESF between 2013 and 2019 were included. Analyses were conducted between March 2023 and February 2024.

Exposures: Hospital participation in BPCI Advanced.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was total episode spending, including spending incurred for the index procedure and 90-day follow-up period. Secondary outcomes included 90-day return inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, and mortality.

Results: Among 14 280 patients who received outpatient BNESF, hospital participation in BPCI Advanced was associated with a differential reduction in total episode spending (-$1201; 95% CI, -2184 to -219) and return inpatient admissions (-2.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.2 to -0.1). For outpatient procedures, the mean (SD) age was 71.8 (8.6) years; 43.9% were women, 3.9% were Black; and 3.2% were Hispanic. Among 23 440 patients who received inpatient BNESF, hospital participation in BPCI Advanced was not associated with differential changes in total episode spending or return inpatient admissions. There were no significant changes for emergency department visits or mortality for either group.

Conclusions and relavance: In this cohort study, participation in the first year of a bundled payment program for outpatient spine surgery was associated with nearly 10% lower spending. No changes in spending were observed for similar inpatient spine surgery procedures. Further evaluation of bundled payments for outpatient surgical conditions and associated changes in care delivery is needed to inform plans to include these episodes in future models.

在医疗保险受益人中,门诊脊柱手术捆绑支付相关的储蓄。
重要性:很少有基于价值的支付计划针对门诊手术,尽管这些手术包括医院进行的大多数手术。2018年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心推出了高级护理改善捆绑支付(BPCI Advanced),这是第一个基于发作的支付模式,包括门诊手术条件-脊柱手术。目前尚不清楚捆绑支付是否会减少门诊手术的支出或提高门诊手术的质量,尽管计划在未来的模式中扩大门诊手术的数量。目的:确定门诊和住院脊柱手术(背部和颈部除外脊柱融合手术[BNESF])第一年的医院参与BPCI高级治疗是否与费用和质量的变化有关。设计、环境和参与者:采用医疗保险索赔和差异中差异分析进行回顾性队列研究,调整患者和市场特征,比较参加BPCI高级治疗的医院门诊和住院BNESF患者与未参加BPCI高级治疗的医院相匹配的对照组患者的结果。纳入了2013年至2019年期间接受门诊和住院BNESF的医疗保险受益人。分析在2023年3月至2024年2月期间进行。暴露:医院参与BPCI进展。主要结局和指标:主要结局是总治疗花费,包括指数手术和90天随访期间的花费。次要结局包括90天内再次住院、急诊科就诊和死亡率。结果:在14 280例接受门诊BNESF的患者中,医院参与BPCI高级治疗与总发作支出的差异减少相关(- 1201美元;95% CI, -2184至-219)和返回住院人数(-2.2个百分点;95% CI, -4.2至-0.1)。对于门诊手术,平均(SD)年龄为71.8(8.6)岁;女性占43.9%,黑人占3.9%;3.2%为西班牙裔。在23 440例接受住院BNESF的患者中,医院参与BPCI高级治疗与总发作花费或再次住院的差异变化无关。两组的急诊科就诊次数和死亡率均无显著变化。结论和相关性:在这项队列研究中,参加门诊脊柱手术捆绑支付计划的第一年与近10%的支出降低相关。在类似的住院脊柱手术中,没有观察到花费的变化。需要进一步评估门诊手术条件的捆绑支付和相关的护理交付变化,以便为未来模型中包括这些事件的计划提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信